8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1913–1979 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mitchell v. Stategreen2 sentences1960The particular language excepted to, however, appears to have been inappropriate, and might have been confusing and misleading, inasmuch as the indictment, or even the prior conviction, of a principal does not establish the complicity of another, and in this case whether or not the defendant was an accomplice was one of the vital issues in the case.” Mitchell v. State, 89 Ga. App. 80, 85 ( 78 S. E. 2d 563 ) was reversed because of the charge that “the other three defendants are not on trial but appear in this case as accomplices,” and goes on to state: “The following charges have been held rev 1960The particular language excepted to, however, appears to have been inappropriate, and might have been confusing and misleading, inasmuch as the indictment, or even the prior conviction, of a principal does not establish the complicity of another, and in this case whether or not the defendant was an accomplice was one of the vital issues in the case.” Mitchell v. State, 89 Ga. App. 80, 85 ( 78 S. E. 2d 563 ) was reversed because of the charge that “the other three defendants are not on trial but appear in this case as accomplices,” and goes on to state: “The following charges have been held rev | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Threlkeld v. State
green
2 sentences1924Threlkeld v. State, 128 Ga. 660 ( 58 S. E. 49 ). 1924Threlkeld v. State, 128 Ga. 660 ( 58 S. E. 49 ). | 2 | 1918–1924 |
Addison v. Cowart
neutral
1 sentence1979Since we have held, in Division 1 of this opinion, that "there was no evidence from which the jury might, with reasonable accuracy, have assessed the amount of the diminution .. . the court did not err, therefore, in failing to charge the jury upon the defense of a partial failure of consideration.” Addison v. Cowart, 43 Ga. App. 365 (2) ( 158 SE 804 ) (1931). 3. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
McDaniel v. Bristol
neutral
1 sentence1979Since we have held, in Division 1 of this opinion, that "there was no evidence from which the jury might, with reasonable accuracy, have assessed the amount of the diminution .. . the court did not err, therefore, in failing to charge the jury upon the defense of a partial failure of consideration.” Addison v. Cowart, 43 Ga. App. 365 (2) ( 158 SE 804 ) (1931). 3. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Palmer v. Stevens
green
1 sentence1970Palmer v. Stevens, 115 Ga. App. 398 , supra. The fourth and fifth enumerations of error complain of the court’s charge to the jury upon the defense of assumption of risk. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Sellers v. State
neutral
1 sentence1960The particular language excepted to, however, appears to have been inappropriate, and might have been confusing and misleading, inasmuch as the indictment, or even the prior conviction, of a principal does not establish the complicity of another, and in this case whether or not the defendant was an accomplice was one of the vital issues in the case.” Mitchell v. State, 89 Ga. App. 80, 85 ( 78 S. E. 2d 563 ) was reversed because of the charge that “the other three defendants are not on trial but appear in this case as accomplices,” and goes on to state: “The following charges have been held rev | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Demonia v. State
green
2 sentences1960The particular language excepted to, however, appears to have been inappropriate, and might have been confusing and misleading, inasmuch as the indictment, or even the prior conviction, of a principal does not establish the complicity of another, and in this case whether or not the defendant was an accomplice was one of the vital issues in the case.” Mitchell v. State, 89 Ga. App. 80, 85 ( 78 S. E. 2d 563 ) was reversed because of the charge that “the other three defendants are not on trial but appear in this case as accomplices,” and goes on to state: “The following charges have been held rev 1960The particular language excepted to, however, appears to have been inappropriate, and might have been confusing and misleading, inasmuch as the indictment, or even the prior conviction, of a principal does not establish the complicity of another, and in this case whether or not the defendant was an accomplice was one of the vital issues in the case.” Mitchell v. State, 89 Ga. App. 80, 85 ( 78 S. E. 2d 563 ) was reversed because of the charge that “the other three defendants are not on trial but appear in this case as accomplices,” and goes on to state: “The following charges have been held rev | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Speed v. State
neutral
2 sentences1934Speed v. State, 176 Ga. 751 (5) ( 168 S. E. 891 ). 3. 1934Speed v. State, 176 Ga. 751 (5) ( 168 S. E. 891 ). 3. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Reed
green
2 sentences1931Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Reed, 35 Ga. App. 538 (6) ( 134 S. E. 134 ). 5. 1931Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Reed, 35 Ga. App. 538 (6) ( 134 S. E. 134 ). 5. | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Lewis v. State
neutral
2 sentences1913Lewis v. State, 125 Ga. 48 ( 53 S. E. 816 ); Lewis v. State, 129 Ga. 731 ( 59 S. E. 782 ). 2. 1913Lewis v. State, 125 Ga. 48 ( 53 S. E. 816 ); Lewis v. State, 129 Ga. 731 ( 59 S. E. 782 ). 2. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Lewis v. State
neutral
2 sentences1913Lewis v. State, 125 Ga. 48 ( 53 S. E. 816 ); Lewis v. State, 129 Ga. 731 ( 59 S. E. 782 ). 2. 1913Lewis v. State, 125 Ga. 48 ( 53 S. E. 816 ); Lewis v. State, 129 Ga. 731 ( 59 S. E. 782 ). 2. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.