Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1915–1991 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Guinangreen2 sentences1988This question has been resolved by the Missouri Supreme Court, en banc, which ruled that the “firmly convinced” language is similar to the definition employed in federal courts, and that these instructions, when read as a whole, “properly instruct the jury upon the standard which they are to use in determining the defendant’s guilt or innocence.” State v. Guinan, 732 S.W.2d 174, 178 [6] (Mo. banc 1987). 1987Our supreme court stated in State v. Guinan, 732 S.W.2d 174, 178 (Mo. banc 1987), that “when read as a whole, MAI-CR2d 2.20 properly instruct the jury upon the standard which they are to use in determining the defendant’s guilt or innocence.” Following those decisions we find no error here. | 5 | 6 |
State v. Sandoegreen2 sentences1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H 1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H | 2 | 2 |
State v. Cardwellgreen2 sentences1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H 1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H | 2 | 2 |
State v. Wilsongreen2 sentences1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H 1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H | 2 | 2 |
State v. McCulloughgreen2 sentences1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H 1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H | 2 | 2 |
State v. Parkergreen2 sentences1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H 1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H | 2 | 2 |
State v. Hadlockgreen2 sentences1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H 1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H | 2 | 2 |
State v. Jonesgreen1 sentence1988Since this Court is bound by the last controlling opinion of the Supreme Court of Missouri, State v. Dunn, 615 S.W.2d 543, 550 [15] (Mo.App.1981); State v. Jones, 703 S.W.2d 41, 42 [1] (Mo.App.1985), the defendant’s argument on this point must fail. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Dunngreen1 sentence1988Since this Court is bound by the last controlling opinion of the Supreme Court of Missouri, State v. Dunn, 615 S.W.2d 543, 550 [15] (Mo.App.1981); State v. Jones, 703 S.W.2d 41, 42 [1] (Mo.App.1985), the defendant’s argument on this point must fail. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Pendergrassgreen1 sentence1987The Supreme Court stated that MAI-CR 2d 2.20, when read in its entirety, “properly instructs] the jury upon the standard which they are to use in determining the defendant’s guilt or innocence.” Id. at 178 ; see also State v. Pendergrass, 726 S.W.2d 831 , (Mo.App.S.D.1987) (Maus, J., concurring). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Trice
green
2 sentences1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H 1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H | 3 | 1936–1939 |
State v. Bagby
green
2 sentences1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H 1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H | 3 | 1936–1939 |
State v. Murray
green
1 sentence1990Murray, 744 S.W.2d at 771 .) The court found that “[w]hen read as a whole MAI-CR2d 2.20 properly instructs] the jury upon the standard which they are to use in determining defendant’s guilt or innocence.” Id. at 178[6]. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Basham v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
green
1 sentence1955Co. of America, 232 Mo.App. 782 , 113 S.W.2d 12 (5, 131, the court held it was not error to instruct the jury upon the presumption against suicide where “there are no facts from which an .inference may be drawn, -for or against, then the presumption against suicide must be regarded by the trial court.” In the remaining cases no instruction such as tendered by plaintiff herein was involved. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
State v. Enochs
green
2 sentences1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H 1939The authorities are to the contrary. [State v. Enochs, 339 Mo. 953 , 98 S. W. (2d) 685 ; State v. Bagby, 338 Mo. 951 , 93 S. W. (2d) 241 ; State v. Trice, 338 Mo. 744 , 92 S. W. (2d) 135 .] In the Bagby case, supra, it was said: “The court was not bound to instruct the jury upon the defense of alibi as a part of the law of the case under Section 3681, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 3681, p. 3227), without a request from defendant for such instruction. [State v. Parker, 301 Mo. 294, 301 (5), 256 S. W. 1040 (5); State v. Cardwell, 312 Mo. 140, 145 , 279 S. W. 99, 100 (3); State v. H | 1 | 1939–1939 |
State v. English
green
2 sentences1936All concur. * See, also, State v. London (Mo. Div. 2), 295 S.W. 547 , 549; State v. English, 308 Mo. 695 , 708, 274 S.W. 470 , 474; State v. Garrett, 285 Mo. 279 , 286, 226 S.W. 4 , 6; State v. Lackey, 230 Mo. 707 , 720, 132 S.W. 602, 606 ; State v. Nicholas, 222 Mo. 425 , 434, 121 S.W. 12, 14 . 1936All concur. * See, also, State v. London (Mo. Div. 2), 295 S.W. 547 , 549; State v. English, 308 Mo. 695 , 708, 274 S.W. 470 , 474; State v. Garrett, 285 Mo. 279 , 286, 226 S.W. 4 , 6; State v. Lackey, 230 Mo. 707 , 720, 132 S.W. 602, 606 ; State v. Nicholas, 222 Mo. 425 , 434, 121 S.W. 12, 14 . | 1 | 1936–1936 |
State v. Garrett
green
2 sentences1936All concur. * See, also, State v. London (Mo. Div. 2), 295 S.W. 547 , 549; State v. English, 308 Mo. 695 , 708, 274 S.W. 470 , 474; State v. Garrett, 285 Mo. 279 , 286, 226 S.W. 4 , 6; State v. Lackey, 230 Mo. 707 , 720, 132 S.W. 602, 606 ; State v. Nicholas, 222 Mo. 425 , 434, 121 S.W. 12, 14 . 1936All concur. * See, also, State v. London (Mo. Div. 2), 295 S.W. 547 , 549; State v. English, 308 Mo. 695 , 708, 274 S.W. 470 , 474; State v. Garrett, 285 Mo. 279 , 286, 226 S.W. 4 , 6; State v. Lackey, 230 Mo. 707 , 720, 132 S.W. 602, 606 ; State v. Nicholas, 222 Mo. 425 , 434, 121 S.W. 12, 14 . | 1 | 1936–1936 |
State v. Nicholas
neutral
2 sentences1936All concur. * See, also, State v. London (Mo. Div. 2), 295 S.W. 547 , 549; State v. English, 308 Mo. 695 , 708, 274 S.W. 470 , 474; State v. Garrett, 285 Mo. 279 , 286, 226 S.W. 4 , 6; State v. Lackey, 230 Mo. 707 , 720, 132 S.W. 602, 606 ; State v. Nicholas, 222 Mo. 425 , 434, 121 S.W. 12, 14 . 1936All concur. * See, also, State v. London (Mo. Div. 2), 295 S.W. 547 , 549; State v. English, 308 Mo. 695 , 708, 274 S.W. 470 , 474; State v. Garrett, 285 Mo. 279 , 286, 226 S.W. 4 , 6; State v. Lackey, 230 Mo. 707 , 720, 132 S.W. 602, 606 ; State v. Nicholas, 222 Mo. 425 , 434, 121 S.W. 12, 14 . | 1 | 1936–1936 |
State v. Lackey
green
2 sentences1936All concur. * See, also, State v. London (Mo. Div. 2), 295 S.W. 547 , 549; State v. English, 308 Mo. 695 , 708, 274 S.W. 470 , 474; State v. Garrett, 285 Mo. 279 , 286, 226 S.W. 4 , 6; State v. Lackey, 230 Mo. 707 , 720, 132 S.W. 602, 606 ; State v. Nicholas, 222 Mo. 425 , 434, 121 S.W. 12, 14 . 1936All concur. * See, also, State v. London (Mo. Div. 2), 295 S.W. 547 , 549; State v. English, 308 Mo. 695 , 708, 274 S.W. 470 , 474; State v. Garrett, 285 Mo. 279 , 286, 226 S.W. 4 , 6; State v. Lackey, 230 Mo. 707 , 720, 132 S.W. 602, 606 ; State v. Nicholas, 222 Mo. 425 , 434, 121 S.W. 12, 14 . | 1 | 1936–1936 |
McAnany v. Shipley
green
2 sentences1927In support of this contention it is urged that though plaintiff’s petition alleges general negligence, and relies upon the doctrine of res ipsa loquitiw, the plaintiff himself testified ‘ ‘ fully and specifically just what did cause his alleged • injury,” thus showing that the facts causing the collision-were as well within his knowledge as- that of the defendant, and therefore there was “neither room nor necessity for the presumption” of negligence which arises in collision cases where the injury of a passenger while in the carrier’s vehicle, the facts causing the injury are peculiarly within 1927In support of this contention it is urged that though plaintiff’s petition alleges general negligence, and relies upon the doctrine of res ipsa loquitiw, the plaintiff himself testified ‘ ‘ fully and specifically just what did cause his alleged • injury,” thus showing that the facts causing the collision-were as well within his knowledge as- that of the defendant, and therefore there was “neither room nor necessity for the presumption” of negligence which arises in collision cases where the injury of a passenger while in the carrier’s vehicle, the facts causing the injury are peculiarly within | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Roaring Fork Potato Growers v. C. C. Clemons Produce Co.
green
1 sentence1923On a hearing, two of the judges concurred in the view that the peremptory instruction given by the trial court was error, and that the case should have gone to the jury upon an instruction that if the jury believed plaintiffs' testimony which tended to establish the facts outlined in the majority opinion, the verdict should be for the plaintiff. [ 232 S.W. 1076 .] But, Judge BRADLEY of that court, dissenting, on the ground that the majority opinion was in conflict with the decision of the Kansas City Court of Appeals in the case of Roaring Fork Potato Growers v. Produce Co., 193 Mo. App. 653 , | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Degonia v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
neutral
1 sentence1915It is reversible error to submit a case on an issue not raised by the pleadings or evidence. [Degonia v. Railroad, 224 Mo. l. c. 589, 123 S. W. 807 .] I. think the judgment should be reversed and the cause remanded. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.