reasonable cause standard in Iowa

8 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (9)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Moodygreen mont · 2006 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014 2 sentences 2014Moreover, we are not convinced that federal precedent inadequately protects our citizens’ basic rights and liberties.”); State v. Moody, 148 P.3d 662, 667, 668 (Mont. 2006) (citing Knights favorably and concluding, under Montana Constitution, “home visits, as a routine and reasonable element of supervising a convicted person serving a term of supervised release, are not searches and are thus not subject to the reasonable cause standard”); State v. Baca, 90 P.3d 509, 519, 520 (N.M. 2014Moreover, we are not convinced that federal precedent inadequately protects our citizens’ basic rights and liberties.”); State v. Moody, 148 P.3d 662, 667, 668 (Mont. 2006) (citing Knights favorably and concluding, under Montana Constitution, “home visits, as a routine and reasonable element of supervising a convicted person serving a term of supervised release, are not searches and are thus not subject to the reasonable cause standard”); State v. Baca, 90 P.3d 509, 519, 520 (N.M.	2	2
State v. Maurstadgreen nd · 2002 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014 2 sentences 2014Ct. App. 2004) (stating “our review of Griffin and Knights reveals no flaws” and noting “[i]n New Mexico, as well, whether a search is unreasonable is determined by balancing the degree of intrusion into a probationer’s privacy against the interest of the government in promoting rehabilitation and protecting society”); State v. Maurstad, 647 N.W.2d 688, 691, 697 (N.D. 2002) (following Knights and commenting “[w]hen reviewing the constitutionality of probationary searches, we have interpreted the North Dakota Constitution to provide the same protections for probationers as provided by the Unite 2014Moreover, we are not convinced that federal precedent inadequately protects our citizens’ basic rights and liberties.”); State v. Moody, 334 Mont. 517 , 148 P.3d 662, 667, 668 (2006) (citing Knights favorably and concluding, under Montana Constitution, “home visits, as a routine and reasonable element of supervising a convicted person serving a term of supervised release, are not searches and are thus not subject to the reasonable cause standard”); State v. Baca, 135 N.M. 490 , 90 P.3d 509, 519, 520 (N.M.Ct.App.2004) (stating “our review of Griffin and Knights reveals no flaws” and noting "[i]	2	2
State v. Kottmangreen sd · 2005 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014 2 sentences 2014Ct. App. 2004) (stating “our review of Griffin and Knights reveals no flaws” and noting “[i]n New Mexico, as well, whether a search is unreasonable is determined by balancing the degree of intrusion into a probationer’s privacy against the interest of the government in promoting rehabilitation and protecting society”); State v. Maurstad, 647 N.W.2d 688, 691, 697 (N.D. 2002) (following Knights and commenting “[w]hen reviewing the constitutionality of probationary searches, we have interpreted the North Dakota Constitution to provide the same protections for probationers as provided by the Unite 2014Moreover, we are not convinced that federal precedent inadequately protects our citizens’ basic rights and liberties.”); State v. Moody, 334 Mont. 517 , 148 P.3d 662, 667, 668 (2006) (citing Knights favorably and concluding, under Montana Constitution, “home visits, as a routine and reasonable element of supervising a convicted person serving a term of supervised release, are not searches and are thus not subject to the reasonable cause standard”); State v. Baca, 135 N.M. 490 , 90 P.3d 509, 519, 520 (N.M.Ct.App.2004) (stating “our review of Griffin and Knights reveals no flaws” and noting "[i]	2	2
State v. Bacagreen nmctapp · 2004 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014 2 sentences 2014Moreover, we are not convinced that federal precedent inadequately protects our citizens’ basic rights and liberties.”); State v. Moody, 148 P.3d 662, 667, 668 (Mont. 2006) (citing Knights favorably and concluding, under Montana Constitution, “home visits, as a routine and reasonable element of supervising a convicted person serving a term of supervised release, are not searches and are thus not subject to the reasonable cause standard”); State v. Baca, 90 P.3d 509, 519, 520 (N.M. 2014Moreover, we are not convinced that federal precedent inadequately protects our citizens’ basic rights and liberties.”); State v. Moody, 148 P.3d 662, 667, 668 (Mont. 2006) (citing Knights favorably and concluding, under Montana Constitution, “home visits, as a routine and reasonable element of supervising a convicted person serving a term of supervised release, are not searches and are thus not subject to the reasonable cause standard”); State v. Baca, 90 P.3d 509, 519, 520 (N.M.	2	2
Terry v. Ohiogreen scotus · 1968 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1993–1995 2 sentences 1995Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1880 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 906 (1968); State v. Cooley, 229 N.W.2d 755, 760 (Iowa 1975). 1995Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1880 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 906 (1968); State v. Cooley, 229 N.W.2d 755, 760 (Iowa 1975).	2	2
State v. Cooleygreen iowa · 1975 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1993–1995 2 sentences 1995Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1880 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 906 (1968); State v. Cooley, 229 N.W.2d 755, 760 (Iowa 1975). 1993Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1880 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 906 (1968); State v. Cooley, 229 N.W.2d 755, 750 (Iowa 1975).	2	2
In the Interest of A.C.C.green utah · 2002 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014 1 sentence 2014Moreover, we are not convinced that federal precedent inadequately protects our citizens’ basic rights and liberties.”); State v. Moody, 334 Mont. 517 , 148 P.3d 662, 667, 668 (2006) (citing Knights favorably and concluding, under Montana Constitution, “home visits, as a routine and reasonable element of supervising a convicted person serving a term of supervised release, are not searches and are thus not subject to the reasonable cause standard”); State v. Baca, 135 N.M. 490 , 90 P.3d 509, 519, 520 (N.M.Ct.App.2004) (stating “our review of Griffin and Knights reveals no flaws” and noting "[i]	1	1
United States v. Sokolowgreen scotus · 1989 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995 2 sentences 1995Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 329 , 110 S.Ct. 2412, 2416 , 110 L.Ed.2d 301, 308 (1990) (citing United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7 , 109 S.Ct. 1581, 1585 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1, 10 (1989)). 1995Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 329 , 110 S.Ct. 2412, 2416 , 110 L.Ed.2d 301, 308 (1990) (citing United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7 , 109 S.Ct. 1581, 1585 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1, 10 (1989)).	1	1
Alabama v. Whitegreen scotus · 1990 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995 2 sentences 1995Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 329 , 110 S.Ct. 2412, 2416 , 110 L.Ed.2d 301, 308 (1990) (citing United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7 , 109 S.Ct. 1581, 1585 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1, 10 (1989)). 1995Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 329 , 110 S.Ct. 2412, 2416 , 110 L.Ed.2d 301, 308 (1990) (citing United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7 , 109 S.Ct. 1581, 1585 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1, 10 (1989)).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Lamp green iowa · 1982 2 sentences 1993The reasonable cause standard for investigatory stops is set forth in State v. Lamp, 322 N.W.2d 48 (Iowa 1982): It is well settled that the fourth amendment requires reasonable cause to stop a vehicle for investigatory purposes. 1993The reasonable cause standard for investigatory stops is set forth in State v. Lamp, 322 N.W.2d 48 (Iowa 1982): It is well settled that the fourth amendment requires reasonable cause to stop a vehicle for investigatory purposes.	3	1991–1993
State v. Bailey green iowa · 1990 1 sentence 2000In Bailey , the officer who stopped the defendant’s car testified that he made the stop pursuant to a radioed request from a fellow officer. 452 N.W.2d at 182 .	1	2000–2000
State v. Aschenbrenner green iowa · 1980 1 sentence 2000We emphasized that “the reasonable cause test does not depend on what cause they articulated; it depends on what the basis of the stop actually was.” Id.	1	2000–2000

Where else courts name it

NY 188 (1973–2026) CA 9 (1986–2025) IA 8 (1991–2014) MT 6 (1997–2022) LA 5 (1989–2011) MN 5 (1988–2014) ME 5 (2011–2020) ID 4 (1979–2022) WI 3 (1986–2011) CT 3 (2017–2024) NM 3 (2002–2010) WA 2 (2018–2023) UT 2 (1998–2001)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check