Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Minnesota opinions name it 1 courts 1988–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Boylegreen2 sentences2014Stelzner, 621 N.W.2d at 742 ; see also United States v. Boyle, 469 U.S. 241, 251 , 105 S.Ct. 687 , 83 L.Ed.2d 622 (1985). 2014Stelzner, 621 N.W.2d at 742 ; see also United States v. Boyle, 469 U.S. 241, 251 , 105 S.Ct. 687 , 83 L.Ed.2d 622 (1985). | 1 | 2 |
State v. McRaegreen2 sentences1995We summarized these two steps, as well as the scope of appellate review, in our decision-in McRae, 494 N.W.2d at 254 : Hernandez makes it clear that the explanation provided by the prosecutor does not have to be “valid” in the sense of establishing a reasonable cause for challenge [ 500 U.S. at 362-64 ], 111 S.Ct. at 1868 , but the explanation must be race-neutral. 1995We summarized these two steps, as well as the scope of appellate review, in our decision in McRae, 494 N.W.2d at 254 : Hernandez makes it clear that the explanation provided by the prosecutor does not have to be "valid" in the sense of establishing a reasonable cause for challenge [ 500 U.S. at 362-64 ], 111 S.Ct. at 1868 , but the explanation must be race-neutral. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hernandez v. New York
green
2 sentences1995We summarized these two steps, as well as the scope of appellate review, in our decision-in McRae, 494 N.W.2d at 254 : Hernandez makes it clear that the explanation provided by the prosecutor does not have to be “valid” in the sense of establishing a reasonable cause for challenge [ 500 U.S. at 362-64 ], 111 S.Ct. at 1868 , but the explanation must be race-neutral. 1995We summarized these two steps, as well as the scope of appellate review, in our decision-in McRae, 494 N.W.2d at 254 : Hernandez makes it clear that the explanation provided by the prosecutor does not have to be “valid” in the sense of establishing a reasonable cause for challenge [ 500 U.S. at 362-64 ], 111 S.Ct. at 1868 , but the explanation must be race-neutral. | 2 | 1992–1995 |
Stelzner v. Commissioner of Revenue
green
1 sentence2014Stelzner, 621 N.W.2d at 742 ; see also United States v. Boyle, 469 U.S. 241, 251 , 105 S.Ct. 687 , 83 L.Ed.2d 622 (1985). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.