shall set hearing (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

shall set hearing in Illinois

8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Mayfieldgreen
ill · 2023 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025See generally People v. Mayfield, 2023 IL 128092, ¶¶ 39-40 . ¶ 55 We further note that section 5-2-4(e) states that, “the Court shall set a hearing to be held within 120 days.” 730 ILCS 5/5-2-4(e) (West 2018).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
In Re Detention of Cain green
illappct · 2003
2 sentences

2010"Whether or not probable cause exists to warrant a further evidentiary hearing is a matter resting in the sound discretion of the court," and "[a]bsent an abuse of that discretion, we will not disturb the court's probable cause determination." In re Detention of Cain, 341 Ill.App.3d at 482 , 275 Ill.Dec. 325 , 792 N.E.2d 800 .

2010"Whether or not probable cause exists to warrant a further evidentiary hearing is a matter resting in the sound discretion of the court," and "[a]bsent an abuse of that discretion, we will not disturb the court's probable cause determination." In re Detention of Cain, 341 Ill.App.3d at 482 , 275 Ill.Dec. 325 , 792 N.E.2d 800 .

22010–2010
People v. Zerbst green
illappct · 2024
2 sentences

2024Id. ¶ 77 In addition, “180 days after a defendant is remanded to the [Department], under paragraph (2), and every 180 days thereafter for so long as the defendant is confined under the order entered thereunder, the court shall set a hearing” and provide notice to all interested and necessary parties.

2024Id. § 104-25(g)(2)(i).

12024–2024
Gibbons v. OSF Healthcare System green
illappct · 2022
2 sentences

2022The court shall direct that notice of the time and place of the hearing be served upon the [patient], his [or her] responsible relatives, - 13 - 2022 IL App (2d) 210038 and the persons entitled to receive a copy of the petition pursuant to Section 3-609.” (Emphases added.) Id. § 3-611. ¶ 28 The Mental Health Code defines the “facility director” as the “chief officer of a mental health or developmental disabilities facility or his [or her] designee or the supervisor of a program of treatment or habilitation, or his [or her] designee.” Id. § 1-104. ¶ 29 The Mental Health Code also provides immun

2022The court shall direct that notice of the time and place of the hearing be served upon the [patient], his [or her] responsible relatives, - 13 - 2022 IL App (2d) 210038 and the persons entitled to receive a copy of the petition pursuant to Section 3-609.” (Emphases added.) Id. § 3-611. ¶ 28 The Mental Health Code defines the “facility director” as the “chief officer of a mental health or developmental disabilities facility or his [or her] designee or the supervisor of a program of treatment or habilitation, or his [or her] designee.” Id. § 1-104. ¶ 29 The Mental Health Code also provides immun

12022–2022
In re Amanda H. green
illappct · 2017
2 sentences

2018Upon the filing of the petition and first certificate, the court shall set a hearing to be held within 5 days * * * after receipt of the petition." Id. § 3-611. ¶ 32 b.

2018The Applicable Law and Standard of Review ¶ 33 "Because the Code protects liberty interests, strict compliance with statutory procedures is required." Amanda H. , 2017 IL App (3d) 150164 , ¶ 34, 413 Ill.Dec. 866 , 79 N.E.3d 215 .

12018–2018
People v. Flores green
ill · 1984
1 sentence

1994(People v. Flores (1984), 104 Ill. 2d 40, 47 .) This court stated the approach for determining whether a time limitation is mandatory in Corrigan v. Illinois Liquor Control Comm’n (1960), 19 Ill. 2d 230 : “The problem is one of statutory construction.

11994–1994
Carrigan v. Illinois Liquor Control Commission green
ill · 1960
1 sentence

1994(People v. Flores (1984), 104 Ill. 2d 40, 47 .) This court stated the approach for determining whether a time limitation is mandatory in Corrigan v. Illinois Liquor Control Comm’n (1960), 19 Ill. 2d 230 : “The problem is one of statutory construction.

11994–1994
In Re Price green
illappct · 1987
1 sentence

1990The respondent cites In re Price (1987), 152 Ill.

11990–1990

Where else courts name it

IL 8 (1990–2025) GA 5 (2008–2010) MT 3 (2023–2026) WA 3 (2006–2008) FL 3 (1981–2024) NJ 2 (1998–1998) TX 2 (2009–2009) CA 2 (1988–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check