8 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 2009–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lohmiller v. Stategreen2 sentences2012See Lohmiller v. State, 884 N.E.2d 903, 915-16 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). 2009Lohmiller v. State, 884 N.E.2d 903, 915-16 (Ind.Ct.App.2008). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Coleman v. State
green
2 sentences2014Id. 2013Id. *364 The fundamental error exception to the waiver rule is an extremely narrow one. | 4 | 2012–2014 |
Ryan Shelby v. State of Indiana
green
1 sentence2016Id. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Oldham v. State
green
1 sentence2011In reversing the defendant’s conviction for murder on the grounds of fundamental error, we observed that when the defendant testified, the prosecutor “tried to use the business cards and the novelty photograph to paint [the defendant] as a dangerous criminal.” Id. at 1172 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |