natural and probable consequences rule (Kansas) · Go Syfert
← Kansas issues

natural and probable consequences rule in Kansas

8 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Harris v. Richardsgreen
kan · 1994 · cited in 4 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 1996–2006
2 sentences

2006See also Harris, 254 Kan. at 553 (following the natural and probable consequences test adopted in Bell).

1998We observed that Kansas has adopted the natural and probable consequences test and that the word accident has a generally accepted meaning according to the popular understanding. 254 Kan. at 553-54 .

24
Bell v. Tiltongreen
kan · 1983 · cited in 4 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 1994–1998
2 sentences

1998For instance, the Bugg court reiterated the natural and probable consequences test first set out in Bell v. Tilton, 234 Kan. 461, 470-71 , 674 P.2d 468 (1983). 265 Kan. at 705-06 .

1998For instance, the Bugg court reiterated the natural and probable consequences test first set out in Bell v. Tilton, 234 Kan. 461, 470-71 , 674 P.2d 468 (1983). 265 Kan. at 705-06 .

24
Reese v. Gas Engineering & Construction Co.green
kan · 1976 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997See Reese v. Gas Engineering & Construction Co., 219 Kan. 536 , Syl. ¶ 4, 548 P.2d 746 (1976); Chinn v. Gay & Taylor, Inc., 219 Kan. 196 , Syl. ¶ 5, 547 P.2d 751 (1976); Bergemann v. North Central Foundry, Inc., 215 Kan. 685, 688 , 527 P.2d 1044 (1974); Jackson v. Stevens Well Service, 208 Kan. 637, 643 , 493 P.2d 264 (1972).

1997See Reese v. Gas Engineering & Construction Co., 219 Kan. 536 , Syl. ¶ 4, 548 P.2d 746 (1976); Chinn v. Gay & Taylor, Inc., 219 Kan. 196 , Syl. ¶ 5, 547 P.2d 751 (1976); Bergemann v. North Central Foundry, Inc., 215 Kan. 685, 688 , 527 P.2d 1044 (1974); Jackson v. Stevens Well Service, 208 Kan. 637, 643 , 493 P.2d 264 (1972).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
First Financial Insurance v. Bugg green
kan · 1998
2 sentences

2008Co. v. Bugg, 265 Kan. 690, 704 , 962 P.2d 515 (1998) (Kansas has "adopted the natural and probable consequences test.").

2008Co. v. Bugg, 265 Kan. 690, 704 , 962 P.2d 515 (1998) (Kansas has "adopted the natural and probable consequences test.").

21998–2008
Thomas v. Benchmark Insurance green
kanctapp · 2006
2 sentences

2008It determined that the injuries were intentionally caused and therefore excluded coverage. 36 Kan.App.2d at 418 , 140 P.3d 438 .

2008It determined that the injuries were intentionally caused and therefore excluded coverage. 36 Kan.App.2d at 418 , 140 P.3d 438 .

12008–2008
International Paper Co. v. Porter Tuberville green
ark · 1990
2 sentences

1997In Stockman v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 211 Kan. 260, 262 , 505 P.2d 697 (1973), we noted that while the natural and probable consequences rule would not apply to a situation where the increased disability results from a new and separate accidental injury, “[t]he rule in Jackson would apply to situation where a claimant’s disability gradually increased from a primary accidental injury.” An illustration of the application of the natural and probable consequences rule to a situation similar to the one at hand is found in International Paper Co. v. Tuberville, 302 Ark. 22 , 786 S.W. 2d 830 (19

1997In Stockman v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 211 Kan. 260, 262 , 505 P.2d 697 (1973), we noted that while the natural and probable consequences rule would not apply to a situation where the increased disability results from a new and separate accidental injury, “[t]he rule in Jackson would apply to situation where a claimant’s disability gradually increased from a primary accidental injury.” An illustration of the application of the natural and probable consequences rule to a situation similar to the one at hand is found in International Paper Co. v. Tuberville, 302 Ark. 22 , 786 S.W. 2d 830 (19

11997–1997
Bergemann v. North Central Foundry, Inc. green
kan · 1974
2 sentences

1997See Reese v. Gas Engineering & Construction Co., 219 Kan. 536 , Syl. ¶ 4, 548 P.2d 746 (1976); Chinn v. Gay & Taylor, Inc., 219 Kan. 196 , Syl. ¶ 5, 547 P.2d 751 (1976); Bergemann v. North Central Foundry, Inc., 215 Kan. 685, 688 , 527 P.2d 1044 (1974); Jackson v. Stevens Well Service, 208 Kan. 637, 643 , 493 P.2d 264 (1972).

1997See Reese v. Gas Engineering & Construction Co., 219 Kan. 536 , Syl. ¶ 4, 548 P.2d 746 (1976); Chinn v. Gay & Taylor, Inc., 219 Kan. 196 , Syl. ¶ 5, 547 P.2d 751 (1976); Bergemann v. North Central Foundry, Inc., 215 Kan. 685, 688 , 527 P.2d 1044 (1974); Jackson v. Stevens Well Service, 208 Kan. 637, 643 , 493 P.2d 264 (1972).

11997–1997
Jackson v. Stevens Well Service green
kan · 1972
2 sentences

1997See Reese v. Gas Engineering & Construction Co., 219 Kan. 536 , Syl. ¶ 4, 548 P.2d 746 (1976); Chinn v. Gay & Taylor, Inc., 219 Kan. 196 , Syl. ¶ 5, 547 P.2d 751 (1976); Bergemann v. North Central Foundry, Inc., 215 Kan. 685, 688 , 527 P.2d 1044 (1974); Jackson v. Stevens Well Service, 208 Kan. 637, 643 , 493 P.2d 264 (1972).

1997See Reese v. Gas Engineering & Construction Co., 219 Kan. 536 , Syl. ¶ 4, 548 P.2d 746 (1976); Chinn v. Gay & Taylor, Inc., 219 Kan. 196 , Syl. ¶ 5, 547 P.2d 751 (1976); Bergemann v. North Central Foundry, Inc., 215 Kan. 685, 688 , 527 P.2d 1044 (1974); Jackson v. Stevens Well Service, 208 Kan. 637, 643 , 493 P.2d 264 (1972).

11997–1997
Stockman v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. of Kansas, Inc. green
kan · 1973
2 sentences

1997In Stockman v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 211 Kan. 260, 262 , 505 P.2d 697 (1973), we noted that while the natural and probable consequences rule would not apply to a situation where the increased disability results from a new and separate accidental injury, “[t]he rule in Jackson would apply to situation where a claimant’s disability gradually increased from a primary accidental injury.” An illustration of the application of the natural and probable consequences rule to a situation similar to the one at hand is found in International Paper Co. v. Tuberville, 302 Ark. 22 , 786 S.W. 2d 830 (19

1997In Stockman v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 211 Kan. 260, 262 , 505 P.2d 697 (1973), we noted that while the natural and probable consequences rule would not apply to a situation where the increased disability results from a new and separate accidental injury, “[t]he rule in Jackson would apply to situation where a claimant’s disability gradually increased from a primary accidental injury.” An illustration of the application of the natural and probable consequences rule to a situation similar to the one at hand is found in International Paper Co. v. Tuberville, 302 Ark. 22 , 786 S.W. 2d 830 (19

11997–1997
Chinn v. Gay & Taylor, Inc. green
kan · 1976
2 sentences

1997See Reese v. Gas Engineering & Construction Co., 219 Kan. 536 , Syl. ¶ 4, 548 P.2d 746 (1976); Chinn v. Gay & Taylor, Inc., 219 Kan. 196 , Syl. ¶ 5, 547 P.2d 751 (1976); Bergemann v. North Central Foundry, Inc., 215 Kan. 685, 688 , 527 P.2d 1044 (1974); Jackson v. Stevens Well Service, 208 Kan. 637, 643 , 493 P.2d 264 (1972).

1997See Reese v. Gas Engineering & Construction Co., 219 Kan. 536 , Syl. ¶ 4, 548 P.2d 746 (1976); Chinn v. Gay & Taylor, Inc., 219 Kan. 196 , Syl. ¶ 5, 547 P.2d 751 (1976); Bergemann v. North Central Foundry, Inc., 215 Kan. 685, 688 , 527 P.2d 1044 (1974); Jackson v. Stevens Well Service, 208 Kan. 637, 643 , 493 P.2d 264 (1972).

11997–1997

Statutes the citing opinions construe

KS § K.S.A. § 20-3018 (4) KS § K.S.A. § 40-3107 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 2931 (1992–2026) TN 43 (1997–2024) KS 8 (1994–2008) DC 4 (2007–2015) OR 4 (2010–2016) WI 2 (1979–1981)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check