walk-and-turn test in Kansas

2018A majority of the Washington Supreme Court recently held in State v. Mecham , 186 Wash. 2d 128 , 134, 380 P.3d 414 (2016), that these tests are a seizure but not a search when-as is true in Puccinelli's case-the driver has not yet been arrested and there's a reasonable basis for the DUI investigation.

2018A majority of the Washington Supreme Court recently held in State v. Mecham , 186 Wash. 2d 128 , 134, 380 P.3d 414 (2016), that these tests are a seizure but not a search when-as is true in Puccinelli's case-the driver has not yet been arrested and there's a reasonable basis for the DUI investigation.

2021App. 2d 20, 32 , 204 P.3d 630 (2008) (evidence of bloodshot eyes is usual physical manifestation of intoxication). • Three coolers with numerous open and empty beer cans in the bed of the pickup truck. 7 • Clark's failure to successfully perform the walk-and-turn test.

2016At the conclusion of the field sobriety tests, Webb agreed to take a PBT, the results of which indicated his blood-alcohol level was .127." Webb, 50 Kan.

2015Recounting then the circumstances that for me supply a “minimum level of objective justification” for the PBT as explained in Edgar, 296 Kan. at 521 , I would cite: (1) Molitor’s admission of alcohol consumption; (2) the strong odor of alcohol on Molitor during the traffic stop; (3) Molitor’s watery and bloodshot eyes; (4) Molitor driving his vehicle into the curb while pulling over and stopping the vehicle with the right front tire halfway up tire curb; and (5) the indicators of impairment Molitor displayed during field sobriety tests when he lost his balance during the instruction phase of t

2015Recounting then the circumstances that for me supply a "minimum level of objective justification" for the PBT as explained in Edgar, 296 Kan. at 521 , I would cite: (1) Molitor's admission of alcohol consumption; (2) the strong odor of alcohol on Molitor during the traffic stop; (3) Molitor's watery and bloodshot eyes; (4) Molitor driving his vehicle into the curb while pulling over and stopping the vehicle with the right front tire halfway up the curb; and (5) the indicators of impairment Molitor displayed during field sobriety tests when he lost his balance during the instruction phase of th

2015But we do not find that these factors substantially dissipated Officer Diaz' reasonable suspicion that Molitor had operated a vehicle under the influence of alcohol." 46 Kan.

2015But in doing so, it also acknowledged and considered the evidence in the record supporting the conclusion that Molitor was not intoxicated, noting he "was able to speak without slurring his words, produced his identification without difficulty, and had only one clue each on the walk-and-turn test and the one-leg-stand test." 46 Kan.

2014Smith, 291 Kan. at 518-19 ; see also Campbell v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 25 Kan.

2011Allen analogizes his case to the situation in City of Norton v. Wonderly, 38 Kan.App.2d 797 , 172 P.3d 1205 (2007), rev. denied 286 Kan. 1176 (2008).

2011Allen analogizes his case to the situation in City of Norton v. Wonderly, 38 Kan.App.2d 797 , 172 P.3d 1205 (2007), rev. denied 286 Kan. 1176 (2008).