8 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Pearsongreen2 sentences1996Defendant failed to preserve this issue for review because he did not raise the issue below in a motion for a posttrial evidentiary hearing, People v Pearson, 404 Mich 698, 722-723 ; 273 NW2d 856 (1979), or in a motion for a new trial, People v Jacques, 215 Mich App 699, 702 ; 547 NW2d 349 (1996); People v Jackson, 178 Mich App 62, 66 ; 443 NW2d 423 (1989). 1996Defendant failed to preserve this issue for review because he did not raise the issue below in a motion for a posttrial evidentiary hearing, People v Pearson, 404 Mich 698, 722-723 ; 273 NW2d 856 (1979), or in a motion for a new trial, People v Jacques, 215 Mich App 699, 702 ; 547 NW2d 349 (1996); People v Jackson, 178 Mich App 62, 66 ; 443 NW2d 423 (1989). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Ginther
green
2 sentences2017We granted defendant’s 1 People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436 ; 212 NW2d 922 (1973). -2- motion to remand.2 Following the posttrial evidentiary hearing, the trial court found that defendant had not been denied the effective assistance of counsel. 2017We granted defendant’s 1 People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436 ; 212 NW2d 922 (1973). -2- motion to remand.2 Following the posttrial evidentiary hearing, the trial court found that defendant had not been denied the effective assistance of counsel. | 2 | 2017–2017 |
People v. Dixon
green
2 sentences2015People v Dixon, 217 Mich App 400, 409 ; 552 NW2d 663 (1996). 2015People v Dixon, 217 Mich App 400, 409 ; 552 NW2d 663 (1996). | 2 | 2009–2015 |
Troyanowski v. Village of Kent City
green
1 sentence2014Id. at 226-227 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
People v. Jackson
green
2 sentences1996Defendant failed to preserve this issue for review because he did not raise the issue below in a motion for a posttrial evidentiary hearing, People v Pearson, 404 Mich 698, 722-723 ; 273 NW2d 856 (1979), or in a motion for a new trial, People v Jacques, 215 Mich App 699, 702 ; 547 NW2d 349 (1996); People v Jackson, 178 Mich App 62, 66 ; 443 NW2d 423 (1989). 1996Defendant failed to preserve this issue for review because he did not raise the issue below in a motion for a posttrial evidentiary hearing, People v Pearson, 404 Mich 698, 722-723 ; 273 NW2d 856 (1979), or in a motion for a new trial, People v Jacques, 215 Mich App 699, 702 ; 547 NW2d 349 (1996); People v Jackson, 178 Mich App 62, 66 ; 443 NW2d 423 (1989). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
People v. Jacques
neutral
2 sentences1996Defendant failed to preserve this issue for review because he did not raise the issue below in a motion for a posttrial evidentiary hearing, People v Pearson, 404 Mich 698, 722-723 ; 273 NW2d 856 (1979), or in a motion for a new trial, People v Jacques, 215 Mich App 699, 702 ; 547 NW2d 349 (1996); People v Jackson, 178 Mich App 62, 66 ; 443 NW2d 423 (1989). 1996Defendant failed to preserve this issue for review because he did not raise the issue below in a motion for a posttrial evidentiary hearing, People v Pearson, 404 Mich 698, 722-723 ; 273 NW2d 856 (1979), or in a motion for a new trial, People v Jacques, 215 Mich App 699, 702 ; 547 NW2d 349 (1996); People v Jackson, 178 Mich App 62, 66 ; 443 NW2d 423 (1989). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
People v. Hubbard
neutral
1 sentence1990Hubbard, supra, pp 714-715 ; Lewis, supra, pp 183-184 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
People v. Lewis
green
1 sentence1990Hubbard, supra, pp 714-715 ; Lewis, supra, pp 183-184 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.