8 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Snider v. Limbach
green
2 sentences1992Snider v. Limbach, supra, 44 Ohio St.3d at 201-202 , 542 N.E.2d at 649 . 1992Snider v. Limbach, supra, 44 Ohio St.3d at 201-202 , 542 N.E.2d at 649 . | 2 | 1992–1992 |
San Allen, Inc. v. Buehrer
green
1 sentence2019Cuyahoga No. 99786, 2014-Ohio-2071 , citing Restatement of the Law 3d, Restitution and Unjust Enrichment, Section 19(1) (2011). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Ellwood Engineered Castings Co. v. Zaino
green
2 sentences2016Ellwood Engineered Castings Co. v. Zaino, 98 Ohio St.3d 424 , 2003-Ohio-1812 , 786 N.E.2d 458 , ¶ 23. 2016Ellwood Engineered Castings Co. v. Zaino, 98 Ohio St.3d 424 , 2003-Ohio-1812 , 786 N.E.2d 458 , ¶ 23. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
City of Cincinnati Ex Rel. Zimmer v. City of Cincinnati
neutral
2 sentences2012Zimmer v. Cincinnati, 176 Ohio App.3d 588 , 2008-Ohio-3156 , 892 N.E.2d 987 , ¶ 11; State ex rel. 2012Zimmer v. Cincinnati, 176 Ohio App.3d 588 , 2008-Ohio-3156 , 892 N.E.2d 987 , ¶ 11; State ex rel. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners v. State
green
2 sentences2012Bd. of Commrs. v. State, 112 Ohio St.3d 59 , 2006-Ohio-6499 , 858 N.E.2d 330, ¶ 23 . {¶17} To have standing to pursue a taxpayer claim under R.C. 733.59, a party must not only satisfy the statutory requirements prior to initiating his action—that he has made a written demand upon the city’s law director and that security for the claim has been posted —but he must also demonstrate that he is enforcing “a right of action on behalf of and for the benefit of the public.” See R.C. 733.59; Teamsters at ¶ 11-12; Cincinnati ex rel. 2012Bd. of Commrs. v. State, 112 Ohio St.3d 59 , 2006-Ohio-6499 , 858 N.E.2d 330, ¶ 23 . {¶17} To have standing to pursue a taxpayer claim under R.C. 733.59, a party must not only satisfy the statutory requirements prior to initiating his action—that he has made a written demand upon the city’s law director and that security for the claim has been posted —but he must also demonstrate that he is enforcing “a right of action on behalf of and for the benefit of the public.” See R.C. 733.59; Teamsters at ¶ 11-12; Cincinnati ex rel. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Jenkins v. Eberhart
green
1 sentence2006Jenkins v. Eberhart (1991), 71 Ohio App.3d 351 , 358 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Midwest Haulers, Inc. v. Glander
green
1 sentence1990Id. at 406, 38 O.O. at 263 , 83 N.E. 2d at 55. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Northwestern Ohio Poultry Ass'n v. Schneider
neutral
1 sentence1973It is conceded by all parties herein that the operation in Northwestern Poultry, supra, was, for purposes of this appeal, identical to the operation of appellees herein. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.