8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Woodard, A., Aplt.green2 sentences2026See Commonwealth v. Woodard, 129 A.3d 480, 509 (Pa. 2015) (failure to present any appellate argument in support of an issue results in waiver); see also Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa. 2009) (citation omitted) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fail[s] to develop [the claim in] any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also Commonwealth v. Heggins, 809 A.2d 908, 912 (Pa. Super. 2002) (an issue identified on appeal but not developed in the appellant’s brief is abandoned 2026See Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b)(4)(vii) (“Issues not included in the [Rule 1925(b) s]tatement …are waived.”); see also Commonwealth v. Woodard, 129 A.3d 480, 509 (Pa. 2015) (failure to present any appellate argument in support of an issue results in waiver); see Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa. 2009) (citation omitted) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fail[s] to develop [the claim in] any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also Commonwealth v. Heggins, 809 A.2d 908, 912 (Pa. | 3 | 3 |
Commonwealth v. Hegginsgreen2 sentences2026See Commonwealth v. Woodard, 129 A.3d 480, 509 (Pa. 2015) (failure to present any appellate argument in support of an issue results in waiver); see also Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa. 2009) (citation omitted) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fail[s] to develop [the claim in] any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also Commonwealth v. Heggins, 809 A.2d 908, 912 (Pa. Super. 2002) (an issue identified on appeal but not developed in the appellant’s brief is abandoned 2026See Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b)(4)(vii) (“Issues not included in the [Rule 1925(b) s]tatement …are waived.”); see also Commonwealth v. Woodard, 129 A.3d 480, 509 (Pa. 2015) (failure to present any appellate argument in support of an issue results in waiver); see Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa. 2009) (citation omitted) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fail[s] to develop [the claim in] any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also Commonwealth v. Heggins, 809 A.2d 908, 912 (Pa. | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2026See Commonwealth v. Woodard, 129 A.3d 480, 509 (Pa. 2015) (failure to present any appellate argument in support of an issue results in waiver); see also Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa. 2009) (citation omitted) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fail[s] to develop [the claim in] any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also Commonwealth v. Heggins, 809 A.2d 908, 912 (Pa. Super. 2002) (an issue identified on appeal but not developed in the appellant’s brief is abandoned 2026See Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b)(4)(vii) (“Issues not included in the [Rule 1925(b) s]tatement …are waived.”); see also Commonwealth v. Woodard, 129 A.3d 480, 509 (Pa. 2015) (failure to present any appellate argument in support of an issue results in waiver); see Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa. 2009) (citation omitted) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fail[s] to develop [the claim in] any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”); see also Commonwealth v. Heggins, 809 A.2d 908, 912 (Pa. | 2 | 2 |
Milby, L. v. Pote, C. v. Southern Christriangreen1 sentence2025See In re C.R., 113 A.3d 328, 335-36 (Pa. Super. 2015); Milby v. Pote, 189 A.3d 1065, 1079 (Pa. Super. 2018). | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of: C.R., a Minorgreen1 sentence2025See In re C.R., 113 A.3d 328, 335-36 (Pa. Super. 2015); Milby v. Pote, 189 A.3d 1065, 1079 (Pa. Super. 2018). | 1 | 1 |
Zabrosky, J. v. Smithbower-Zabrosky, G.green1 sentence2024See Zabrosky, 273 A.3d at 1121 n.4. | 1 | 1 |
Satiro, F. v. Maninno, A.green2 sentences2021See Satiro v. Maninno, 237 A.3d 1145, 1150 (Pa. Super. 2020) (a Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement that is too vague to allow the trial court to identify the issue results in waiver). 2021Satiro, 237 A.3d at 1150 . | 1 | 1 |
Fillmore v. Hillgreen1 sentence2019See Fillmore v. Hill, 665 A.2d 514, 516 (Pa. Super. 1995) (“Failure to timely object to a basic and fundamental error . . . will result in waiver of that issue. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Edmondsongreen1 sentence2015Pa.R.Crim.P. 647(B); Commonwealth v. Edmondson, 718 A.2d 751, 753 (Pa. 1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.