issue results waiver (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

issue results waiver in Texas

111 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2025 83 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (12)

CaseFollowedCited
Valadez v. Avitiagreen
texapp · 2007 · cited in 82 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2012–2025
2 sentences

2025App. P. 38.1(i) (addressing briefing requirements); Adams v. State, No. 08-10-00235-CR, 2012 WL 3025915 , at *5 (Tex. App.—El Paso July 25, 2012, no pet.) (not designated for publication) (recognizing that when an appellant has “inadequately briefed [an]issue, nothing is presented for [an appellate court’s] review,” and the issue is therefore “waived” (citing Valadez v. Avitia, 238 S.W.3d 843, 845 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2007, no pet.) (recognizing that the failure to adequately brief an issue results in waiver))).

2025App. P. 38.1(i) (addressing briefing requirements); Adams v. State, No. 08-10-00235-CR, 2012 WL 3025915 , at *5 (Tex. App.—El Paso July 25, 2012, no pet.) (not designated for publication) (recognizing that when an appellant has “inadequately briefed [an]issue, nothing is presented for [an appellate court’s] review,” and the issue is therefore “waived” (citing Valadez v. Avitia, 238 S.W.3d 843, 845 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2007, no pet.) (recognizing that the failure to adequately brief an issue results in waiver))).

8282
Sunnyside Feedyard, L.C. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.green
texapp · 2003 · cited in 8 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2005–2009
2 sentences

2009Co., 106 S.W.3d 169, 173 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 2003, no pet.) (holding that the failure to properly brief an issue results in its waiver).

2009Co., 106 S.W.3d 169, 173 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 2003, no pet.) (holding that the failure to properly brief an issue results in its waiver). 9 unsuccessfully, argued to this court by Lawrence and others of her family disputing title to the land.

88
Maldonado v. Stategreen
texapp · 1995 · cited in 5 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2002–2009
2 sentences

2009See Maldonado v. State , 902 S.W.2d 708, 711 (Tex. App.–El Paso 1995, no writ) (holding that the failure to provide legal citation in support of an issue results in the waiver of that issue).

2002See Maldonado v. State, 902 S.W.2d 708, 711 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1995, no writ) (holding that the failure to provide legal citation in support of an issue results in the waiver of that issue).

55
Moser v. Davisgreen
texapp · 2002 · cited in 4 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2005–2006
2 sentences

2006Co., 106 S.W.3d 169, 173 (Tex. App.-Amarillo 2003, no pet.) (holding that the failure to properly brief an issue results in its waiver); Moser v. Davis, 79 S.W.3d 162, 169 (Tex. App.-Amarillo 2002, no pet.) (holding that the failure to properly brief an issue results in its waiver).

2005Co., 106 S.W.3d 169, 173 (Tex. App.-Amarillo 2003, no pet.) (holding that the failure to properly brief an issue results in its waiver); Moser v. Davis, 79 S.W.3d 162, 169 (Tex. App.-Amarillo 2002, no pet.) (holding that the failure to properly brief an issue results in its waiver).

44
Wilkinson v. Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Boardgreen
texapp · 2001 · cited in 4 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2003–2006
2 sentences

2006Id. at 20 (holding that the failure to adequately brief an issue results in the waiver of the issue).

2003Id. at 20 (holding that the failure to adequately brief an issue results in the waiver of the issue).

44
Billy v. Stategreen
texapp · 2002 · cited in 3 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2003–2009
2 sentences

2009Billy v. State, 77 S.W.3d 427, 429 (Tex. App.--Dallas 2002, pet. ref'd) (holding that the failure to properly brief an issue results in its waiver).

2003Billy v. State, 77 S.W.3d 427, 429 (Tex. App.--Dallas 2002, pet. ref'd) (holding that the failure to properly brief an issue results in its waiver).

33
Rsl Funding, LLC and Rsl Special-Iv Limited Partnership v. Rickey Newsomegreen
tex · 2018 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2019–2023
2 sentences

2023RSL Funding, LLC v. Newsome, 569 S.W.3d 116, 126 (Tex. 2018).

2019RSL Funding, LLC v. Newsome, 569 S.W.3d 116, 126 (Tex. 2018).

22
Nolan v. Stategreen
texapp · 2003 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010Nolan v. State, 102 S.W.3d 231, 235-36 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. ref’d).

2010Nolan v. State , 102 S.W.3d 231, 235-36 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. ref’d).

22
Swearingen v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 2003 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2003–2008
2 sentences

2008See Swearingen v. State , 101 S.W.3d 89, 100 (Tex. Crim.

2003See Swearingen v. State, 101 S.W.3d 89, 100 (Tex. Crim.

22
in the Interest of E.R.C., a Minor Childgreen
texapp · 2016 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024In re E.R.C., 496 S.W.3d 270, 278 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2016, pet. denied) (finding waiver where an issue was inadequately briefed).

11
In Re ADAgreen
texapp · 2009 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015See In re ADA, 287 S.W.3d 382, 390 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 2009, no pet.).

2015See In re ADA, 287 S.W.3d at 390 (the failure to adequately brief an issue results in its waiver on appeal); see Tex. R.

11
Crooks v. M1 Real Estate Partners, Ltd.green
texapp · 2007 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
2 sentences

2009P. 38.1(h) (requiring a brief to contain a clear and concise argument for the contentions made with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record); see Crooks v. M1 Real Estate Partners, Ltd., 238 S.W.3d 474, 488 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2007, pet. denied) (stating that the failure to brief an issue results in its waiver). [2] Cano filed both a traditional and no evidence motion for summary judgment. [3] The "condition" at issue consisted of placing a hot, uninsulated wire too close to a bare metal guy wire.

2009See Tex.R.App P. 38.1(h) (requiring a brief to contain a clear and concise argument for the contentions made with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record); see Crooks v. M1 Real Estate Partners, Ltd., 238 S.W.3d 474, 488 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2007, pet. denied) (stating that the failure to brief an issue results in its waiver). .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Statutes the citing opinions construe

TX § Tex. Penal Code § 42.02 (81) TX § Tex. Penal Code § 42.03 (71)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 111 (2002–2025) TN 15 (1998–2024) PA 8 (2015–2026) IL 7 (1993–2017) IN 5 (1995–2018) MI 3 (2013–2025) AL 2 (2000–2009)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check