8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1967–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Riverwalk Casino, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Boardgreen2 sentences2016In applying this standard “an appellate tribunal is not to substitute its judgment for that of the lower tribunal and the standard is not to be applied in such a manner as would intrude upon the agency’s fact-finding role and discretionary decision-making authority.” Id. at 930 (internal quotation marks omitted). 2016In applying this standard “an appellate tribunal is not to substitute its judgment for that of the lower tribunal and the standard is not to be applied in such a manner as would intrude upon the agency's fact- finding role and discretionary decision-making authority.” Id. at 930 (internal quotation marks omitted). | 3 | 3 |
Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Boardgreen2 sentences2007Wintermyer, 812 A.2d at 484 . 4 Under this standard, an appellate tribunal is not to substitute its judgment for that of the lower tribunal and the standard “is not to be applied in such a manner as would intrude upon the agency’s fact-finding role and discretionary decision-making authority.” Id. at 487-88. 2007Wintermyer, 812 A.2d at 484 . 4 Under this standard, an appellate tribunal is not to substitute its judgment for that of the lower tribunal and the standard “is not to be applied in such a manner as would intrude upon the agency’s fact-finding role and discretionary decision-making authority.” Id. at 487-88. | 3 | 3 |
Rothman v. Rothmangreen2 sentences1967See Rothman v. Rothman, 425 Pa. 406 , 228 A. 2d 899 (1967); Wenz v. Wenz, 400 Pa. 397 , 162 A. 2d 376 (1960). 1967See Rothman v. Rothman, 425 Pa. 406 , 228 A. 2d 899 (1967); Wenz v. Wenz, 400 Pa. 397 , 162 A. 2d 376 (1960). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dauphin County Grand Jury Investigation Proceedings
green
1 sentence2024Shelley, 2 A.2d at 811 -12 (quoting statute) (emphasis added). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Wenz v. Wenz
green
2 sentences1967See Rothman v. Rothman, 425 Pa. 406 , 228 A. 2d 899 (1967); Wenz v. Wenz, 400 Pa. 397 , 162 A. 2d 376 (1960). 1967See Rothman v. Rothman, 425 Pa. 406 , 228 A. 2d 899 (1967); Wenz v. Wenz, 400 Pa. 397 , 162 A. 2d 376 (1960). | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.