Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Maryland opinions name it 1 courts 1963–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Josephgreen2 sentences2019Therefore, “an attorney ‘must be candid at all times with a tribunal or inquiry board.’” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Butler, 456 Md. 227, 238 (2017) (quoting Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Joseph, 422 Md. 670, 699 (2011)). 2019Therefore, “an attorney ‘must be candid at all times with a tribunal or inquiry board.’” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Butler, 456 Md. 227, 238 (2017) (quoting Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Joseph, 422 Md. 670, 699 (2011)). | 2 | 4 |
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Butlergreen2 sentences2019Therefore, “an attorney ‘must be candid at all times with a tribunal or inquiry board.’” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Butler, 456 Md. 227, 238 (2017) (quoting Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Joseph, 422 Md. 670, 699 (2011)). 2019Therefore, “an attorney ‘must be candid at all times with a tribunal or inquiry board.’” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Butler, 456 Md. 227, 238 (2017) (quoting Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Joseph, 422 Md. 670, 699 (2011)). | 2 | 3 |
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kapoorgreen2 sentences2011Pak, 400 Md. at 601 , 929 A.2d at 566 ; Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Kapoor, 391 Md. 505, 531 , 894 A.2d 502, 518 (2006). 2011Pak, 400 Md. at 601 , 929 A.2d at 566 ; Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Kapoor, 391 Md. 505, 531 , 894 A.2d 502, 518 (2006). | 2 | 2 |
Attorney Grievance v. Ambegreen2 sentences2023Candor to the Tribunal (Rule 3.3(a)) Rule 3.3(a) provides that “an attorney shall not knowingly: (1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal by the attorney[.]” Rule 3.3 commands that “‘[a]n attorney must be candid at all times with a tribunal or inquiry board.’” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Wemple, 479 Md. 167, 196 (2022) (quoting Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Ambe, 466 Md. 270, 295 (2019)). 2022An attorney has a special duty as an officer of the court “to avoid conduct that undermines the integrity of the adjudicative process.” MARPC 19- 303.3 cmt. [2]. “[A]n attorney must be candid at all times with a tribunal or inquiry board.” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Ambe, 466 Md. 270, 295 , 218 A.3d 757 , 771 (2019). | 1 | 3 |
Attorney Grievance v. Wemplegreen1 sentence2023Candor to the Tribunal (Rule 3.3(a)) Rule 3.3(a) provides that “an attorney shall not knowingly: (1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal by the attorney[.]” Rule 3.3 commands that “‘[a]n attorney must be candid at all times with a tribunal or inquiry board.’” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Wemple, 479 Md. 167, 196 (2022) (quoting Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Ambe, 466 Md. 270, 295 (2019)). | 1 | 1 |
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kentgreen2 sentences2007Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Kapoor, 391 Md. 505, 531 , 894 A.2d 502, 518 (2006) (attorney was disbarred for a series of violations, including misrepresenting material facts to a bankruptcy court); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Kent, 337 Md. 361, 371 , 653 A.2d 909, 914 (1995) (an attorney was found to show a lack of candor before a tribunal, when it was revealed in a subsequent inquiry that he was not truthful to the trial court). 2007Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Kapoor, 391 Md. 505, 531 , 894 A.2d 502, 518 (2006) (attorney was disbarred for a series of violations, including misrepresenting material facts to a bankruptcy court); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Kent, 337 Md. 361, 371 , 653 A.2d 909, 914 (1995) (an attorney was found to show a lack of candor before a tribunal, when it was revealed in a subsequent inquiry that he was not truthful to the trial court). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ward
green
2 sentences2018Accordingly, a lawyer violates MLRPC 3.3(a)(1) when he or she knowingly provides the court with false information, Smith , 442 Md. at 34 , 109 A.3d 1184 (citing Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Ward , 394 Md. 1 , 32, 904 A.2d 477 (2006) ), or fails to correct any false information previously provided, Joseph , 422 Md. at 699 , 31 A.3d 137 . 2018Accordingly, a lawyer violates MLRPC 3.3(a)(1) when he or she knowingly provides the court with false information, Smith , 442 Md. at 34 , 109 A.3d 1184 (citing Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Ward , 394 Md. 1 , 32, 904 A.2d 477 (2006) ), or fails to correct any false information previously provided, Joseph , 422 Md. at 699 , 31 A.3d 137 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Smith
green
2 sentences2018Accordingly, a lawyer violates MLRPC 3.3(a)(1) when he or she knowingly provides the court with false information, Smith , 442 Md. at 34 , 109 A.3d 1184 (citing Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Ward , 394 Md. 1 , 32, 904 A.2d 477 (2006) ), or fails to correct any false information previously provided, Joseph , 422 Md. at 699 , 31 A.3d 137 . 2018Accordingly, a lawyer violates MLRPC 3.3(a)(1) when he or she knowingly provides the court with false information, Smith , 442 Md. at 34 , 109 A.3d 1184 (citing Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Ward , 394 Md. 1 , 32, 904 A.2d 477 (2006) ), or fails to correct any false information previously provided, Joseph , 422 Md. at 699 , 31 A.3d 137 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Attorney Grievance Commission v. White
green
2 sentences2017Accordingly, a lawyer violates Rule 3.3 when he or she gives “false and misleading testimony.” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. White, 354 Md. 346, 365 , 731 A.2d 447 (1999). 2017Accordingly, a lawyer violates Rule 3.3 when he or she gives “false and misleading testimony.” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. White, 354 Md. 346, 365 , 731 A.2d 447 (1999). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Pak
green
2 sentences2011Pak, 400 Md. at 601 , 929 A.2d at 566 ; Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Kapoor, 391 Md. 505, 531 , 894 A.2d 502, 518 (2006). 2011Pak, 400 Md. at 601 , 929 A.2d at 566 ; Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Kapoor, 391 Md. 505, 531 , 894 A.2d 502, 518 (2006). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
McCloskey v. Director of Patuxent Institution
green
1 sentence1963Sec. 6 (e) of Art. 31B provides that “The Court which last sentenced the defendant * * * shall retain jurisdiction of the defendant for the purpose of any procedures specified in Secs. 6, 7, 8 or 9 hereof * * *.” In McCloskey v. Director, 230 Md. 635 , we said, in interpreting this provision, that “it is implicit * * * that the last sentence means the latest sentence prior to the order for examination.” Lambson’s conviction and sentence for escape by the Circuit Court for Washington County occurred some ten months before Judge Niles ordered him recommitted to Patuxent for examination. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.