8 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1996–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Nicholsgreen1 sentence2026Goswick, 656 S.W.2d at 358-60 ; see also Nichols, 877 S.W.2d at 737 . | 1 | 1 |
Crain v. Browngreen1 sentence2003Estate of Hamilton v. Morris, 67 S.W.3d 797, 797-98 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001) (quoting Crain v. Brown, 823 S.W.2d 187, 192 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991)). | 1 | 1 |
Blair v. Johnson City Medical Center Hospitalgreen1 sentence1996Braswell v. Carothers, 863 S.W.2d at 730 (the judgment was final and the movant relied on the newly discovered evidence rule); Blair v. Johnson City Medical Ctr., 724 S.W.2d 370, 371 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986) (the requirements of Tenn. R. | 1 | 1 |
Braswell v. Carothersgreen1 sentence1996Braswell v. Carothers, 863 S.W.2d at 730 (the judgment was final and the movant relied on the newly discovered evidence rule); Blair v. Johnson City Medical Ctr., 724 S.W.2d 370, 371 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986) (the requirements of Tenn. R. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bradley v. McLeod
green
2 sentences2001For the reasons stated below, we reject the newly discovered evidence rule applied by the trial court and set forth in Bradley v. McLeod, 984 S.W.2d 929 (Tenn.Ct.App.1998). 2001For the reasons stated below, we reject the newly discovered evidence rule applied by the trial court and set forth in Bradley v. McLeod, 984 S.W.2d 929 (Tenn.Ct.App.1998). | 4 | 2000–2001 |
State v. Goswick
green
1 sentence2026Goswick, 656 S.W.2d at 358-60 ; see also Nichols, 877 S.W.2d at 737 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Harris v. Chern
green
1 sentence2001Harris, 33 S.W.3d at 743-44 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
SCHAEFER BY SCHAEFER v. Larsen
green
1 sentence2001Specifically, Harris rejected the decision of the Western Section of this Court in Schaefer v. Larsen, 688 S.W.2d 430 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1984) wherein that Court refused to apply the stringent newly discovered evidence rule to motions to alter or amend under Rule 59.04, holding that such motions should be looked upon favorably where the litigants had not yet been afforded a trial. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.