8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2015–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Vaughn v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Vaughn v. State, 888 SW2d 62, 72 (Tex. App. – Houston [1st Dist] 1994, p.d.r. granted and affirmed, 931 SW2d 564, 1996 ) The attorney’s assistance is determined by the totality of the representation. 2015Vaughn v. State, 888 SW2d 62, 72 (Tex. App. – Houston [1st Dist] 1994, p.d.r. granted and affirmed, 931 SW2d 564, 1996 ) The attorney’s assistance is determined by the totality of the representation. | 2 | 2 |
Rosenzweig v. Azurix Corp.green1 sentence2025Motions to reconsider are particularly discouraged when they raise “arguments which could, and should, have been made before the judgment issued.” Rosenzweig v. Azurix Corp., 332 F.3d 854, 863 (5th Cir. 2003); accord Macy v. Waste Mgmt., Inc., 294 S.W.3d 638, 651 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. denied). 998 ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES The motion is a series of one- or two-liners that often fail to cite authority or meaningfully analyze the issues they raise. | 1 | 1 |
MacY v. Waste Management, Inc.green1 sentence2025Motions to reconsider are particularly discouraged when they raise “arguments which could, and should, have been made before the judgment issued.” Rosenzweig v. Azurix Corp., 332 F.3d 854, 863 (5th Cir. 2003); accord Macy v. Waste Mgmt., Inc., 294 S.W.3d 638, 651 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet. denied). 998 ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES The motion is a series of one- or two-liners that often fail to cite authority or meaningfully analyze the issues they raise. | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Virginiared1 sentence2015Jackson v. Virginia, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789 (1979). | 1 | 1 |
Louis, Cory Dongreen1 sentence2015Cf. Louis v. State, 393 S.W.3d 246, 251 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Vaughn v. State
green
2 sentences2015Vaughn v. State, 888 SW2d 62, 72 (Tex. App. – Houston [1st Dist] 1994, p.d.r. granted and affirmed, 931 SW2d 564, 1996 ) The attorney’s assistance is determined by the totality of the representation. 2015Vaughn v. State, 888 SW2d 62, 72 (Tex. App. – Houston [1st Dist] 1994, p.d.r. granted and affirmed, 931 SW2d 564, 1996 ) The attorney’s assistance is determined by the totality of the representation. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Meza v. State
green
1 sentence2016In compliance with the Anders procedure, as set forth in Meza v. State of Texas, 206 S.W.3d 684 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2015ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES The test for determining whether a defendant was denied the effective assistance of counsel was established by the Supreme Court of the United Brief for Appellant Page Ricardo Javier Pena 9 States in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 806 L. 2015ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES The test for determining whether a defendant was denied the effective assistance of counsel was established by the Supreme Court of the United Brief for Appellant Page Ricardo Javier Pena 9 States in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 806 L. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Ex Parte Shivers
green
1 sentence2015Ex Parte Shivers, 501 S.W.2d 898 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2015–2015 |