8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.red2 sentences2011See id.; M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 10-19 , 92 S.Ct. 1907, 1913-18 , 32 L.Ed.2d 513 (1972) (stating that a forum-selection clause may be held invalid upon a showing of fraud, undue influence, or overweening bargaining power, and that a valid forum-selection clause is still unenforceable upon a showing that (1) enforcement of the clause would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which suit was filed or (2) the balance of convenience is strongly in favor of litigation in the forum in which suit was filed, and litigation in the forum identified in the clause woul 2011See id.; M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 10-19 , 92 S.Ct. 1907, 1913-18 , 32 L.Ed.2d 513 (1972) (stating that a forum-selection clause may be held invalid upon a showing of fraud, undue influence, or overweening bargaining power, and that a valid forum-selection clause is still unenforceable upon a showing that (1) enforcement of the clause would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which suit was filed or (2) the balance of convenience is strongly in favor of litigation in the forum in which suit was filed, and litigation in the forum identified in the clause woul | 2 | 4 |
Barnett v. Network Solutions, Inc.green2 sentences2002See Barnett, 38 S.W.3d at 203 (discussing both Texas and federal law in upholding forum selection clause requiring claims to be brought in Virginia); Accelerated Christian, 925 S.W.2d at 71 (noting federal law supports trend toward enforcing valid forum selection clause in upholding forum selection clause providing for litigation of disputes in California). 2002See Barnett, 38 S.W.3d at 203 (discussing both Texas and federal law in upholding forum selection clause requiring claims to be brought in Virginia); Accelerated Christian, 925 S.W.2d at 71 (noting federal law supports trend toward enforcing valid forum selection clause in upholding forum selection clause providing for litigation of disputes in California). | 2 | 2 |
Accelerated Christian Education, Inc. v. Oracle Corp.green2 sentences2002See Barnett, 38 S.W.3d at 203 (discussing both Texas and federal law in upholding forum selection clause requiring claims to be brought in Virginia); Accelerated Christian, 925 S.W.2d at 71 (noting federal law supports trend toward enforcing valid forum selection clause in upholding forum selection clause providing for litigation of disputes in California). 2002See Barnett, 38 S.W.3d at 203 (discussing both Texas and federal law in upholding forum selection clause requiring claims to be brought in Virginia); Accelerated Christian, 925 S.W.2d at 71 (noting federal law supports trend toward enforcing valid forum selection clause in upholding forum selection clause providing for litigation of disputes in California). | 2 | 2 |
In Re AIU Insurance Co.green2 sentences2011Co., 148 S.W.3d 109, 111-12 (Tex.2004) (adopting Bremen analysis under Texas law); Deep Water Slender Wells, Ltd. v. Shell Int'l Exploration & Prod., Inc., 234 S.W.3d 679, 692-93 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2007, pet. denied) (addressing Bremen legal standard). 2011Co., 148 S.W.3d 109, 111-12 (Tex.2004) (adopting Bremen analysis under Texas law); Deep Water Slender Wells, Ltd. v. Shell Int’l Exploration & Prod., Inc., 234 S.W.3d 679, 692-93 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2007, pet. denied) (addressing Bremen legal standard). | 1 | 2 |
Deep Water Slender Wells, Ltd. v. Shell International Exploration & Production, Inc.green2 sentences2011Co., 148 S.W.3d 109, 111-12 (Tex.2004) (adopting Bremen analysis under Texas law); Deep Water Slender Wells, Ltd. v. Shell Int'l Exploration & Prod., Inc., 234 S.W.3d 679, 692-93 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2007, pet. denied) (addressing Bremen legal standard). 2011Co., 148 S.W.3d 109, 111-12 (Tex.2004) (adopting Bremen analysis under Texas law); Deep Water Slender Wells, Ltd. v. Shell Int’l Exploration & Prod., Inc., 234 S.W.3d 679, 692-93 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2007, pet. denied) (addressing Bremen legal standard). | 1 | 2 |
Abacan Technical Services Ltd. v. Global Marine International Services Corp.green2 sentences2002Corp., 994 S.W.2d 839, 843-14 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.) (applying Bremen analysis to forum selection clause in arms-length, international agreement freely negotiated by sophisticated parties); Stobaugh v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd., 5 S.W.3d 232, 234-36 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. denied), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 820 , 121 S.Ct. 62 , 148 L.Ed.2d 28 (2000) (applying federal maritime law to case involving forum selection clause in cruise line passenger ticket). 2002Corp ., 994 S.W.2d 839 , 843 B 44 (Tex. App. C Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.) (applying Bremen analysis to forum selection clause in arms-length, international agreement freely negotiated by sophisticated parties); Stobaugh v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd. , 5 S.W.3d 232 , 234 B 36 (Tex. App. _ Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. denied), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 820 (2000) (applying federal maritime law to case involving forum selection clause in cruise line passenger ticket). | 1 | 2 |
Stobaugh v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd.green2 sentences2002Corp., 994 S.W.2d 839, 843-14 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.) (applying Bremen analysis to forum selection clause in arms-length, international agreement freely negotiated by sophisticated parties); Stobaugh v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd., 5 S.W.3d 232, 234-36 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. denied), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 820 , 121 S.Ct. 62 , 148 L.Ed.2d 28 (2000) (applying federal maritime law to case involving forum selection clause in cruise line passenger ticket). 2002Corp ., 994 S.W.2d 839 , 843 B 44 (Tex. App. C Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.) (applying Bremen analysis to forum selection clause in arms-length, international agreement freely negotiated by sophisticated parties); Stobaugh v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd. , 5 S.W.3d 232 , 234 B 36 (Tex. App. _ Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. denied), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 820 (2000) (applying federal maritime law to case involving forum selection clause in cruise line passenger ticket). | 1 | 2 |
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,265green2 sentences2016See also Stamm v. Barclays Bank of New York, 153 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 1998); Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 148 F.3d 1285 (11 th Cir. 1998); Haynsworth v. The Corporation, 121 F.3d 956 (5th Cir. 1997); Allen v. Lloyd's ofLondon, 94 F.3d 923 (4th Cir. 1996); Shell v. R.W. 2016See also Stamm v. Barclays Bank of New York, 153 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 1998); Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 148 F.3d 1285 (11 th Cir. 1998); Haynsworth v. The Corporation, 121 F.3d 956 (5th Cir. 1997); Allen v. Lloyd's ofLondon, 94 F.3d 923 (4th Cir. 1996); Shell v. R.W. | 1 | 1 |
Saqui v. Pride Central America, LLCgreen1 sentence2015Jan. 23, 2014) Cir.2013); see also Saqui, 595 F.3d at 210 (“Fifth Circuit (applying balancing-of-interest factors but also addressing law has consistently held that when a defendant submits to unreasonableness argument under Bremen standard). the jurisdiction of an alternate forum, that renders the forum available for purposes of FNC analysis.”). © 2015 Thomson Reuters. | 1 | 1 |
DTEX, LLC v. BBVA Bancomer, S.A.green1 sentence2015No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 11 Giant Eagle's Motion to Strike Page 25 R486 Wellogix, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc., 58 F.Supp.3d 766 (2014) DTEX, LLC v. BBVA Bancomer, S.A., 508 F.3d 785, 796 (5th [28] To dismiss a case for forum non conveniens a court Cir.2007) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). must establish that the defendants are amenable to process in Because Wellogix has made no showing to the contrary, the alternative forum. | 1 | 1 |
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shutegreen2 sentences1999Burger King, 471 U.S. at 473 n. 14, 105 S.Ct. at 2182 n. 14; see also Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 590-94 , 111 S.Ct. 1522, 1526-28 , 113 L.Ed.2d 622 (1991) (applyingM/S Bremen rule to nonnegotiated international contract); Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506, 518-19 , 94 S.Ct. 2449, 2456-57 , 41 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974) (applying M/S Bremen rule to agreement to arbitrate in a particular forum). 3. 1999Burger King, 471 U.S. at 473 n. 14, 105 S.Ct. at 2182 n. 14; see also Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 590-94 , 111 S.Ct. 1522, 1526-28 , 113 L.Ed.2d 622 (1991) (applyingM/S Bremen rule to nonnegotiated international contract); Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506, 518-19 , 94 S.Ct. 2449, 2456-57 , 41 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974) (applying M/S Bremen rule to agreement to arbitrate in a particular forum). 3. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Alexandria Historical Restoration & Preservation Commission v. Federal Highway Administration
green
2 sentences2002Corp., 994 S.W.2d 839, 843-14 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.) (applying Bremen analysis to forum selection clause in arms-length, international agreement freely negotiated by sophisticated parties); Stobaugh v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd., 5 S.W.3d 232, 234-36 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. denied), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 820 , 121 S.Ct. 62 , 148 L.Ed.2d 28 (2000) (applying federal maritime law to case involving forum selection clause in cruise line passenger ticket). 2002Corp ., 994 S.W.2d 839 , 843 B 44 (Tex. App. C Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.) (applying Bremen analysis to forum selection clause in arms-length, international agreement freely negotiated by sophisticated parties); Stobaugh v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd. , 5 S.W.3d 232 , 234 B 36 (Tex. App. _ Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. denied), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 820 (2000) (applying federal maritime law to case involving forum selection clause in cruise line passenger ticket). | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Phoenix Network Technologies (Europe) Ltd. v. Neon Systems, Inc.
green
2 sentences2022(Europe) Ltd. v. Neon Sys., 177 S.W.3d 605 , 611–12 & n.6 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, no pet.) (emphasis added) (noting that the threshold matter of showing that the parties agreed on an exclusive forum was consistent with The Bremen test announced by the Supreme Court). 2022(Europe) Ltd. v. Neon Sys., 177 S.W.3d 605 , 611–12 & n.6 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, no pet.) (emphasis added) (noting that the threshold matter of showing that the parties agreed on an exclusive forum was consistent with The Bremen test announced by the Supreme Court). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
cluster 12698
green
2 sentences2016See also Stamm v. Barclays Bank of New York, 153 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 1998); Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 148 F.3d 1285 (11 th Cir. 1998); Haynsworth v. The Corporation, 121 F.3d 956 (5th Cir. 1997); Allen v. Lloyd's ofLondon, 94 F.3d 923 (4th Cir. 1996); Shell v. R.W. 2016See also Stamm v. Barclays Bank of New York, 153 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 1998); Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 148 F.3d 1285 (11 th Cir. 1998); Haynsworth v. The Corporation, 121 F.3d 956 (5th Cir. 1997); Allen v. Lloyd's ofLondon, 94 F.3d 923 (4th Cir. 1996); Shell v. R.W. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Allen v. Lloyd's of London
green
2 sentences2016See also Stamm v. Barclays Bank of New York, 153 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 1998); Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 148 F.3d 1285 (11 th Cir. 1998); Haynsworth v. The Corporation, 121 F.3d 956 (5th Cir. 1997); Allen v. Lloyd's ofLondon, 94 F.3d 923 (4th Cir. 1996); Shell v. R.W. 2016See also Stamm v. Barclays Bank of New York, 153 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 1998); Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 148 F.3d 1285 (11 th Cir. 1998); Haynsworth v. The Corporation, 121 F.3d 956 (5th Cir. 1997); Allen v. Lloyd's ofLondon, 94 F.3d 923 (4th Cir. 1996); Shell v. R.W. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
cluster 755745
green
2 sentences2016See also Stamm v. Barclays Bank of New York, 153 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 1998); Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 148 F.3d 1285 (11 th Cir. 1998); Haynsworth v. The Corporation, 121 F.3d 956 (5th Cir. 1997); Allen v. Lloyd's ofLondon, 94 F.3d 923 (4th Cir. 1996); Shell v. R.W. 2016See also Stamm v. Barclays Bank of New York, 153 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 1998); Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 148 F.3d 1285 (11 th Cir. 1998); Haynsworth v. The Corporation, 121 F.3d 956 (5th Cir. 1997); Allen v. Lloyd's ofLondon, 94 F.3d 923 (4th Cir. 1996); Shell v. R.W. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Caldas & Sons, Inc. v. Willingham
green
1 sentence2015Caldas & Sons, Inc. v. Willingham, 17 F.3d 123 , 127–28 (5th Furthermore, since Wellogix has made no showing that this Cir.1994). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Wellogix, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.
green
2 sentences2015No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 10 Giant Eagle's Motion to Strike Page 24 R485 Wellogix, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc., 58 F.Supp.3d 766 (2014) a particular forum will have jurisdiction and must clearly Judge Ellison applied the Bremen standard, and he held that demonstrate the parties' intent to make that jurisdiction the forum-selection clause was enforceable. 60 To the extent exclusive.” Id. 2015No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 10 Giant Eagle's Motion to Strike Page 24 R485 Wellogix, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc., 58 F.Supp.3d 766 (2014) a particular forum will have jurisdiction and must clearly Judge Ellison applied the Bremen standard, and he held that demonstrate the parties' intent to make that jurisdiction the forum-selection clause was enforceable. 60 To the extent exclusive.” Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Society of Lloyd's v. Mullin
green
2 sentences2011See ante at pp. 8–9; Ingersoll Milling Mach. 6 The issue in this case is whether the Dutch judgments should be enforced under the Uniform Act rather than whether the Dutch litigation should be dismissed based upon the forum-selection clauses. 13 Co., 833 F.2d at 688 ; Society of Lloyd’s, 255 F.Supp.2d at 474 ; Uniform Foreign Country Money Judgments Recognition Act, § 4, cmt. 12, 13 Pt. 2011See ante at pp. 8–9; Ingersoll Milling Mach. 6 The issue in this case is whether the Dutch judgments should be enforced under the Uniform Act rather than whether the Dutch litigation should be dismissed based upon the forum-selection clauses. 13 Co., 833 F.2d at 688 ; Society of Lloyd’s, 255 F.Supp.2d at 474 ; Uniform Foreign Country Money Judgments Recognition Act, § 4, cmt. 12, 13 Pt. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Ingersoll Milling MacHine Co. v. John P. Granger
green
2 sentences2011See ante at pp. 8–9; Ingersoll Milling Mach. 6 The issue in this case is whether the Dutch judgments should be enforced under the Uniform Act rather than whether the Dutch litigation should be dismissed based upon the forum-selection clauses. 13 Co., 833 F.2d at 688 ; Society of Lloyd’s, 255 F.Supp.2d at 474 ; Uniform Foreign Country Money Judgments Recognition Act, § 4, cmt. 12, 13 Pt. 2011See ante at pp. 8–9; Ingersoll Milling Mach. 6 The issue in this case is whether the Dutch judgments should be enforced under the Uniform Act rather than whether the Dutch litigation should be dismissed based upon the forum-selection clauses. 13 Co., 833 F.2d at 688 ; Society of Lloyd’s, 255 F.Supp.2d at 474 ; Uniform Foreign Country Money Judgments Recognition Act, § 4, cmt. 12, 13 Pt. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
City of Sioux Center v. Rural Water System 1
green
1 sentence2002Corp., 994 S.W.2d 839, 843-14 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.) (applying Bremen analysis to forum selection clause in arms-length, international agreement freely negotiated by sophisticated parties); Stobaugh v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd., 5 S.W.3d 232, 234-36 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. denied), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 820 , 121 S.Ct. 62 , 148 L.Ed.2d 28 (2000) (applying federal maritime law to case involving forum selection clause in cruise line passenger ticket). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Collins Entertainment, Inc. v. South Carolina Law Enforcement Division
green
1 sentence2002Corp., 994 S.W.2d 839, 843-14 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.) (applying Bremen analysis to forum selection clause in arms-length, international agreement freely negotiated by sophisticated parties); Stobaugh v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd., 5 S.W.3d 232, 234-36 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. denied), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 820 , 121 S.Ct. 62 , 148 L.Ed.2d 28 (2000) (applying federal maritime law to case involving forum selection clause in cruise line passenger ticket). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
green
2 sentences1999Burger King, 471 U.S. at 473 n. 14, 105 S.Ct. at 2182 n. 14; see also Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 590-94 , 111 S.Ct. 1522, 1526-28 , 113 L.Ed.2d 622 (1991) (applyingM/S Bremen rule to nonnegotiated international contract); Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506, 518-19 , 94 S.Ct. 2449, 2456-57 , 41 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974) (applying M/S Bremen rule to agreement to arbitrate in a particular forum). 3. 1999Burger King, 471 U.S. at 473 n. 14, 105 S.Ct. at 2182 n. 14; see also Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 590-94 , 111 S.Ct. 1522, 1526-28 , 113 L.Ed.2d 622 (1991) (applyingM/S Bremen rule to nonnegotiated international contract); Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506, 518-19 , 94 S.Ct. 2449, 2456-57 , 41 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974) (applying M/S Bremen rule to agreement to arbitrate in a particular forum). 3. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.
green
2 sentences1999Burger King, 471 U.S. at 473 n. 14, 105 S.Ct. at 2182 n. 14; see also Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 590-94 , 111 S.Ct. 1522, 1526-28 , 113 L.Ed.2d 622 (1991) (applyingM/S Bremen rule to nonnegotiated international contract); Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506, 518-19 , 94 S.Ct. 2449, 2456-57 , 41 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974) (applying M/S Bremen rule to agreement to arbitrate in a particular forum). 3. 1999Burger King, 471 U.S. at 473 n. 14, 105 S.Ct. at 2182 n. 14; see also Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 590-94 , 111 S.Ct. 1522, 1526-28 , 113 L.Ed.2d 622 (1991) (applyingM/S Bremen rule to nonnegotiated international contract); Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506, 518-19 , 94 S.Ct. 2449, 2456-57 , 41 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974) (applying M/S Bremen rule to agreement to arbitrate in a particular forum). 3. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.