8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re AutoNation, Inc.green2 sentences2008The primary reason for its decision was that neither Texas courts nor the Texas Legislature had ever declared a fundamental Texas policy requiring every employment dispute with a Texas resident be litigated in Texas: "We recognized in AIU that even where Texas statutory provisions specify the application of Texas law, these provisions are irrelevant to the enforceability of a forum-selection clause where no statute 'requires suit to be brought or maintained in Texas.'" Id. at 669 . 2008The primary reason for its decision was that neither Texas courts nor the Texas Legislature had ever declared a fundamental Texas policy requiring every employment dispute with a Texas resident be litigated in Texas: “We recognized in AIU that even where Texas statutory provisions specify the application of Texas law, these provisions are irrelevant to the enforceability of a forum-selection clause where no statute ‘requires suit to be brought or maintained in Texas.’ ” Id. at 669 . | 2 | 4 |
In Re International Profit Associates, Inc.green2 sentences2009In re Int’l Profit Assocs., Inc., 274 S.W.3d 672, 675 (Tex.2009) (citing In re Lyon, 257 S.W.3d at 231-32 ). 2009In re Int'l Profit Assocs., Inc. , 274 S.W.3d 672, 675 (Tex. 2009) (citing In re Lyon , 257 S.W.3d at 231-32). . . . | 2 | 2 |
GP Plastics Corp. v. Interboro Packaging Corp.green1 sentence2015No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 7 Giant Eagle's Motion to Strike Page 21 R482 Wellogix, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc., 58 F.Supp.3d 766 (2014) waiver inquiry: that a party cannot waive its forum-selection clause right[ ] unless that party possessed an actual intent When addressing waiver of a forum-selection clause, 39 however, the Fifth Circuit applied Texas law and concluded to relinquish that right.” Although there is some support *774 for this proposition, the correct source of the governing that waiver requires an intent to relinquish a known rule remains unclear. right. 40 See GP | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Prosperous Maritime Corp. v. Farwah
green
1 sentence2017Dresser-Rand cites only one case that concluded that the enforceability of a forum-selection clause was not reviewable on interlocutory appeal, Prosperous Maritime Corp. v. Farwah, 189 S.W.3d 389 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2006, no pet.). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Wellogix, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.
green
1 sentence2015No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 7 Giant Eagle's Motion to Strike Page 21 R482 Wellogix, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc., 58 F.Supp.3d 766 (2014) waiver inquiry: that a party cannot waive its forum-selection clause right[ ] unless that party possessed an actual intent When addressing waiver of a forum-selection clause, 39 however, the Fifth Circuit applied Texas law and concluded to relinquish that right.” Although there is some support *774 for this proposition, the correct source of the governing that waiver requires an intent to relinquish a known rule remains unclear. right. 40 See GP | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In Re Lyon Financial Services, Inc.
green
1 sentence2009In re Int’l Profit Assocs., Inc., 274 S.W.3d 672, 675 (Tex.2009) (citing In re Lyon, 257 S.W.3d at 231-32 ). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.