8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Ellisgreen2 sentences2024If a non-cognizable claim is resolved on the merits in a pretrial habeas [proceeding], then the pretrial writ has been misused.” Ellis, 309 S.W.3d at 79 (internal citation omitted); see Ex parte Hammons, 631 S.W.3d 715 , 716 1 The trial court clerk filed Lopez-Miranda’s habeas application as a document in the same cause number as the underlying criminal proceeding. 2019“If a non-cognizable claim is resolved on the merits in a pretrial habeas appeal, then the pretrial writ has 10 been misused, and the State can appropriately petition [the Court of Criminal Appeals] to correct such misuse.” Id. | 3 | 8 |
Perry, Ex Parte James Richard \Rick\""green1 sentence2016Ellis, 309 S.W.3d at 79 ; see also Perry, 483 S.W.3d at 895-97 (addressing cognizability of separation of powers claim as a threshold matter). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.