8 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wyatt v. Furr's Supermarkets, Inc.green2 sentences2002Wyatt v. Furr's Supermarkets, Inc., 908 S.W.2d 266, 270 (Tex. App.--El Paso 1995, writ denied); Negrini v. Beale , 822 S.W.2d 822, 823-24 (Tex.App.--Houston [14 th Dist.] 1992, no writ). 2002When a party participates in a hearing without notifying the court of any complaint, that party has waived its right to object to a lack of notice and may not raise the question for the first time on appeal. *715 Wyatt v. Furr’s Supermarkets, Inc., 908 S.W.2d 266, 270 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1995, writ denied); Negrini v. Beale, 822 S.W.2d 822, 823-24 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no writ). | 5 | 5 |
Negrini v. Bealegreen2 sentences2002Wyatt v. Furr's Supermarkets, Inc., 908 S.W.2d 266, 270 (Tex. App.--El Paso 1995, writ denied); Negrini v. Beale , 822 S.W.2d 822, 823-24 (Tex.App.--Houston [14 th Dist.] 1992, no writ). 2002When a party participates in a hearing without notifying the court of any complaint, that party has waived its right to object to a lack of notice and may not raise the question for the first time on appeal. *715 Wyatt v. Furr’s Supermarkets, Inc., 908 S.W.2d 266, 270 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1995, writ denied); Negrini v. Beale, 822 S.W.2d 822, 823-24 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, no writ). | 5 | 5 |
Manning v. Northgreen1 sentence2023See Manning v. North, 82 S.W.3d 706, 714-15 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2002, no pet.) (‘When a party participates in a hearing without notifying the court of any complaint, that party has waived its right to object to a lack of notice and may not raise the question for the first time on appeal.”); see also Hadeler v. Hadeler, No. 04-06-00459-CV, 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 4969 , at *2 (Tex. App.—San Antonio June 27, 2007, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“A party that receives untimely notice must file a motion for continuance or raise the notice complaint during the hearing to preserve error; any error resulting from | 1 | 1 |
Lawyers Lloyds v. Webbgreen2 sentences1993See Lawyers Lloyds of Texas v. Webb, 137 Tex. 107 , 152 S.W.2d 1096 (1941); In re Estate of Hillje, 830 S.W.2d at 691 ; Norman, 665 S.W.2d at 140 . 1993See Lawyers Lloyds of Texas v. Webb, 137 Tex. 107 , 152 S.W.2d 1096 (1941); In re Estate of Hillje, 830 S.W.2d at 691 ; Norman, 665 S.W.2d at 140 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Francis v. Denenberg
green
1 sentence1997Id. at 791 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Norman v. Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Inc.
green
1 sentence1993See Lawyers Lloyds of Texas v. Webb, 137 Tex. 107 , 152 S.W.2d 1096 (1941); In re Estate of Hillje, 830 S.W.2d at 691 ; Norman, 665 S.W.2d at 140 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
In Re Estate of Hillje
green
1 sentence1993See Lawyers Lloyds of Texas v. Webb, 137 Tex. 107 , 152 S.W.2d 1096 (1941); In re Estate of Hillje, 830 S.W.2d at 691 ; Norman, 665 S.W.2d at 140 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.