8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1928–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Personal Restraint of Cook
green
2 sentences1999In re Cook, 114 Wash.2d at 813 , 792 P.2d 506 . 1999In re Cook, 114 Wash.2d at 813 , 792 P.2d 506 . | 2 | 1999–1999 |
Mitchell Grain & Supply Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
neutral
2 sentences1939Mitchell Grain & Supply Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co. of Baltimore, 108 Kan. 379 , 195 Pac. 978 , 16 A. L. 1939Mitchell Grain & Supply Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co. of Baltimore, 108 Kan. 379 , 195 Pac. 978 , 16 A. L. | 2 | 1928–1939 |
In Re the Personal Restraint of Williams
green
2 sentences2021Restraint of Williams, 111 Wn.2d 353, 365 , 759 P.2d 436 (1988). 2021Restraint of Williams, 111 Wn.2d 353, 365 , 759 P.2d 436 (1988). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
In re the Personal Restraint of Griffin
green
2 sentences2021A PRP must include, at a bare minimum, “[a] statement of (i) the facts upon which the claim of unlawful restraint of petitioner is based and the evidence available to support the factual allegations, (ii) why other remedies are inadequate, and (iii) why the petitioner's restraint is unlawful.” In re Griffin, 181 Wn. 2021App. 99, 104 , 325 P.3d 322 (2014), remanded, 182 Wn.2d 1022 , 349 P.3d 819 (2015); RAP 16.7(a)(2). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.
green
1 sentence1993In short, it is the character of the claim and not of the defense that is determinative of the question whether an amount of money sued for is a "liquidated sum." 74 Wn.2d at 33 (quoting C. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State ex rel. W. W. Robinson Co. v. Gilliam
neutral
2 sentences1934Robinson Co. v. Gilliam, 94 Wash. 243 , 161 Pac. 1194 , upon the same statutes, we said: “It seems clear from a reading of these sections that, when the claim of lien was made upon the money and papers in the attorney’s hands, then the court should have proceeded summarily to inquire into the facts upon which the claim of lien was founded and determined the same. 1934Robinson Co. v. Gilliam, 94 Wash. 243 , 161 Pac. 1194 , upon the same statutes, we said: “It seems clear from a reading of these sections that, when the claim of lien was made upon the money and papers in the attorney’s hands, then the court should have proceeded summarily to inquire into the facts upon which the claim of lien was founded and determined the same. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.