result of a statutory violation (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

result of a statutory violation in Connecticut

7 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1983–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Coughlin v. Petersgreen
conn · 1965 · cited in 4 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1983–1995
2 sentences

1995It is well established that “[i]n order to establish liability as a result of a statutory violation, a plaintiff must satisfy two conditions. ‘First, the plaintiff must be within the class of persons protected by the statute. [Coughlin v. Peters, 153 Conn. 99, 101 , 214 A.2d 127 (1965)]; Hassett v. Palmer, 126 Conn. 468, 473 , 12 A.2d 646 [1940]; Monroe v. Hartford Street Ry.

1995It is well established that “[i]n order to establish liability as a result of a statutory violation, a plaintiff must satisfy two conditions. ‘First, the plaintiff must be within the class of persons protected by the statute. [Coughlin v. Peters, 153 Conn. 99, 101 , 214 A.2d 127 (1965)]; Hassett v. Palmer, 126 Conn. 468, 473 , 12 A.2d 646 [1940]; Monroe v. Hartford Street Ry.

14

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Hassett v. Palmer green
conn · 1940
2 sentences

1995It is well established that “[i]n order to establish liability as a result of a statutory violation, a plaintiff must satisfy two conditions. ‘First, the plaintiff must be within the class of persons protected by the statute. [Coughlin v. Peters, 153 Conn. 99, 101 , 214 A.2d 127 (1965)]; Hassett v. Palmer, 126 Conn. 468, 473 , 12 A.2d 646 [1940]; Monroe v. Hartford Street Ry.

1995It is well established that “[i]n order to establish liability as a result of a statutory violation, a plaintiff must satisfy two conditions. ‘First, the plaintiff must be within the class of persons protected by the statute. [Coughlin v. Peters, 153 Conn. 99, 101 , 214 A.2d 127 (1965)]; Hassett v. Palmer, 126 Conn. 468, 473 , 12 A.2d 646 [1940]; Monroe v. Hartford Street Ry.

41983–1995
Gore v. People's Savings Bank green
conn · 1995
2 sentences

2019Cf. Gore v. People’s Savings Bank, 235 Conn. 360 , 375–76, 665 A.2d 1341 (1995) (‘‘It is well established that [i]n order to establish liability as a result of a statutory violation, a plaintiff must satisfy two condi- tions.

2019Cf. Gore v. People’s Savings Bank, 235 Conn. 360 , 375–76, 665 A.2d 1341 (1995) (‘‘It is well established that [i]n order to establish liability as a result of a statutory violation, a plaintiff must satisfy two condi- tions.

22018–2019
Monroe v. Hartford Street Railway Co. green
· 1903
2 sentences

1995Co., 76 Conn. 201, 207 , 56 A. 498 [1903].

1995Co., 76 Conn. 201, 207 , 56 A. 498 [1903].

21989–1995
Berchtold v. Maggi green
conn · 1983
2 sentences

1992Second, the injury must be of the type which the statute was intended to prevent.'" Berchtold v. Maggi, 191 Conn. 266 , 274-75 , 464 A.2d 1 (1983).

1992Second, the injury must be of the type which the statute was intended to prevent.'" Berchtold v. Maggi, 191 Conn. 266 , 274-75 , 464 A.2d 1 (1983).

11992–1992

Where else courts name it

NY 7 (1984–2025) CT 7 (1983–2019) KS 3 (1991–2009) LA 2 (1938–2016) MO 2 (2023–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check