pursuant doctrine in Georgia

2014Stearns initially appealed this case to the Supreme Court of Georgia, which transferred the case in an order entered August 12, 2013, to this Court pursuant to the doctrine set forth in Graham v. Tallent, 235 Ga. 47, 49 ( 218 SE2d 799 ) (1975), holding that “[c] ases respecting title to land” constitute “actions at law... in which the plaintiff asserts a presently enforceable legal title against the possession of the defendant for the purpose of recovering the land.” See also Strickland v. McElreath, 308 Ga. App. 627, 630 ( 708 SE2d 580 ) (2011) (Smith, J., concurring fully and specially).

2014Stearns initially appealed this case to the Supreme Court of Georgia, which transferred the case in an order entered August 12, 2013, to this Court pursuant to the doctrine set forth in Graham v. Tallent, 235 Ga. 47, 49 ( 218 SE2d 799 ) (1975), holding that “[c] ases respecting title to land” constitute “actions at law... in which the plaintiff asserts a presently enforceable legal title against the possession of the defendant for the purpose of recovering the land.” See also Strickland v. McElreath, 308 Ga. App. 627, 630 ( 708 SE2d 580 ) (2011) (Smith, J., concurring fully and specially).

2014Stearns initially appealed this case to the Supreme Court of Georgia, which transferred the case in an order entered August 12, 2013, to this Court pursuant to the doctrine set forth in Graham v. Tallent, 235 Ga. 47, 49 ( 218 SE2d 799 ) (1975), holding that “[c] ases respecting title to land” constitute “actions at law... in which the plaintiff asserts a presently enforceable legal title against the possession of the defendant for the purpose of recovering the land.” See also Strickland v. McElreath, 308 Ga. App. 627, 630 ( 708 SE2d 580 ) (2011) (Smith, J., concurring fully and specially).

2014Stearns initially appealed this case to the Supreme Court of Georgia, which transferred the case in an order entered August 12, 2013, to this Court pursuant to the doctrine set forth in Graham v. Tallent, 235 Ga. 47, 49 ( 218 SE2d 799 ) (1975), holding that “[c] ases respecting title to land” constitute “actions at law... in which the plaintiff asserts a presently enforceable legal title against the possession of the defendant for the purpose of recovering the land.” See also Strickland v. McElreath, 308 Ga. App. 627, 630 ( 708 SE2d 580 ) (2011) (Smith, J., concurring fully and specially).

1978Code Ann. § 24-106; Chapman v. Gray, 8 Ga. 337 (3) (1850); Hicks v. Maple Valley Corp., 223 Ga. 577 ( 156 SE2d 904 ) (1967); King v. Skinner, 101 Ga. App. 102 (2) ( 112 SE2d 789 ) (1960).

1967Code § 24-106; Chapman v. Gray, 8 Ga. 337, 339 (3).

2014(Punctuation omitted.) Holloway v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., 317 Ga. App. 452 ( 731 SE2d 763 ) (2012), citing Benton v. Benton, 280 Ga. 468, 470 ( 629 SE2d 204 ) (2006).

2014(Punctuation omitted.) Holloway v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., 317 Ga. App. 452 ( 731 SE2d 763 ) (2012), citing Benton v. Benton, 280 Ga. 468, 470 ( 629 SE2d 204 ) (2006).

1992“Each enumerated error in an appealing party’s brief must be supported by specific reference to the record or transcript or both, and any argument or assertion founded on particular portions of evidence must be supported by a reference to page or pages of transcript or record where the evidence may be found, and such rules promulgated by this court pursuant to its rule-making authority ‘are binding on those who practice in this court and must be observed.’ [Cits.] The absence of specific page references [in appellant’s brief] is tantamount to an abandonment of the enumerations of error. [Cit.]

1992“Each enumerated error in an appealing party’s brief must be supported by specific reference to the record or transcript or both, and any argument or assertion founded on particular portions of evidence must be supported by a reference to page or pages of transcript or record where the evidence may be found, and such rules promulgated by this court pursuant to its rule-making authority ‘are binding on those who practice in this court and must be observed.’ [Cits.] The absence of specific page references [in appellant’s brief] is tantamount to an abandonment of the enumerations of error. [Cit.]

1985Each enumerated error in an appealing party’s brief must be supported by specific reference to the record or transcript or both, and any argument or assertion founded on particular portions of evidence must be supported by a reference to page or pages of transcript or record where the evidence may be found, and such rules promulgated by this court pursuant to its rule-making authority “are binding on those who practice in this court and must be observed.” Crider v. State, 115 Ga. App. 347 (1) ( 154 SE2d 743 ) (1967); accord Justice v. Dunbar, 152 Ga. App. 831 ( 264 SE2d 301 ) (1979).

1985Each enumerated error in an appealing party’s brief must be supported by specific reference to the record or transcript or both, and any argument or assertion founded on particular portions of evidence must be supported by a reference to page or pages of transcript or record where the evidence may be found, and such rules promulgated by this court pursuant to its rule-making authority “are binding on those who practice in this court and must be observed.” Crider v. State, 115 Ga. App. 347 (1) ( 154 SE2d 743 ) (1967); accord Justice v. Dunbar, 152 Ga. App. 831 ( 264 SE2d 301 ) (1979).

1977Fleming v. State, 236 Ga. 434, 438 ( 224 SE2d 15 ) (1976).

1977Fleming v. State, 236 Ga. 434, 438 ( 224 SE2d 15 ) (1976).