56 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lopezgreen2 sentences1995State v. Lopez, 562 So.2d 1064, 1066 (La.App. 1st Cir.1990). 1993State v. Lopez, 562 So.2d 1064, 1066 (La. | 8 | 8 |
State v. Bouttegreen2 sentences1983Cf. Brooks v. Tennessee, 406 U.S. 605 , 92 S.Ct. 1891 , 32 L.Ed.2d 358 (1972)." In State v. Boutte, 384 So.2d 773, 777 (La.1980), the Court emphasized that "not every erroneous exclusion of disobeying witnesses is reversible error. 1982State v. Edsall, supra ; State v. Boutte, 384 So.2d 773 (La.1980). | 2 | 3 |
State v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2005The Louisiana Supreme Court stated, in State v. Jones, 354 So.2d 530, 532 (La.1978): "Excluding the witness's testimony, in the absence of a sequestration violation with the consent or knowledge of the defendant or his counsel, is not a constitutionally permissible means of insuring reliable testimony." Federal courts have adopted a similar view. 2005In brief, the state argues that if this court were to find the witnesses were improperly excluded, the matter should be remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the witnesses' testimony would have been material, citing State v. Jones, supra . | 1 | 5 |
State v. Ondekgreen2 sentences1994State v. Ondek, 584 So.2d 282, 298 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 586 So.2d 539 (La.1991). 1993State v. Ondek, 584 So.2d 282 (La.App. 1st Cir.1991), writ denied, 586 So.2d 539 (La. 1991). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Ardoingreen2 sentences1990State v. Ardoin, 340 So.2d 1362 (La.1976); State v. Nolan, supra . 1990State v. Ardoin, 340 So.2d 1362, 1363 (La. 1976). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Dunngreen1 sentence2012See, e.g., State v. Dunn, 01-1635 (La.11/01/02), 831 So.2d 862 , appeal after remand, 01-1635 (La.05/11/10), 41 So.3d 454 ; cert. denied, Dunn v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 650 , 178 L.Ed.2d 480 (2010), (in which a proffer was made of the testimony of a witness excluded because of a sequestration violation; a review of the proffer revealed no prejudice to defendant). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Dunngreen1 sentence2012See, e.g., State v. Dunn, 01-1635 (La.11/01/02), 831 So.2d 862 , appeal after remand, 01-1635 (La.05/11/10), 41 So.3d 454 ; cert. denied, Dunn v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 650 , 178 L.Ed.2d 480 (2010), (in which a proffer was made of the testimony of a witness excluded because of a sequestration violation; a review of the proffer revealed no prejudice to defendant). | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Lutchergreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Neversgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Lutchergreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Reveregreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Sneedgreen | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. Carl D. Schaefergreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Hamiltongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mason Braswell v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida
green
2 sentences1988We then followed Braswell v. Wainwright, 463 F.2d 1148 (5th Cir.1972) and held that exclusion of a witness’ testimony, in the absence of a sequestration violation with the consent connivance, procurement or knowledge of the defendant or his counsel, is constitutionally impermissible. 1986We then followed Braswell v. Wainwright, 463 F.2d 1148 (5th Cir.1972) and held that exclusion of a witness’ testimony, in the absence of a sequestration violation with the consent [,] connivance, procurement or knowledge of the defendant or his counsel, is con- stitutionally impermissible. | 5 | 1983–2005 |
State v. Luquette
red
2 sentences2009State v. Luquette, 275 So.2d 396 (La.1973); State v. Craighead, 114 La. 84 , 38 So. 28 (1905); State v. Hornsby, 8 Rob. 554 (La.1844). 1979Unlike State v. Martin, 329 So.2d 688 (La.1976) and State v. Luquette, 275 So.2d 396 (La.1973) upon which the majority relies, there was no significant violation of the sequestration rule. | 4 | 1979–2009 |
State v. Parker
green
2 sentences2008State v. Parker, 421 So.2d 834 (La.1982); Silvio v. Rogers, 580 So.2d 434 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1991); Williams v. State Farm Mut. 1996State v. Narcisse, 426 So.2d 118 (La.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 865 , 104 S.Ct. 202 , 78 L.Ed.2d 176 (1983); State v. Parker, 421 So.2d 834 (La. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1044 , 103 S.Ct. 1443 , 75 L.Ed.2d 799 (1983). | 4 | 1983–2008 |
Briscoe v. Briscoe
neutral
2 sentences2018Id. ; Henry v. Sullivan , 16-564 (La. 2006"The Louisiana Supreme Court, while recognizing that disqualification is a drastic remedy, specifically approves the measure, however, when the sequestration violation was committed with the consent, connivance, procurement or knowledge of the party calling the witnesses." Briscoe v. Briscoe, 25,955, p. 6 (La.App. 2 Cir. 8/17/94), 641 So.2d 999, 1005 . | 3 | 2006–2018 |
State v. Trahan
green
2 sentences2018State v. Trahan , 576 So.2d 1 (La. 1990) ; Briscoe v. Briscoe , 25,955 (La. 2018State v. Trahan , 576 So.2d 1 (La. 1990) ; Briscoe v. Briscoe , 25,955 (La. | 3 | 1994–2018 |
State v. Craighead
green
2 sentences2009State v. Luquette, 275 So.2d 396 (La.1973); State v. Craighead, 114 La. 84 , 38 So. 28 (1905); State v. Hornsby, 8 Rob. 554 (La.1844). 2009State v. Luquette, 275 So.2d 396 (La.1973); State v. Craighead, 114 La. 84 , 38 So. 28 (1905); State v. Hornsby, 8 Rob. 554 (La.1844). | 3 | 1996–2009 |
McDougall v. North Carolina
green
2 sentences1998State v. Narcisse, 426 So.2d 118 (La.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 865 , 104 S.Ct. 202 , 78 L.Ed.2d 176 (1983); State v. Sterling, 95-673 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2/27/96) , 670 So.2d 1316 . 1989In State v. Narcisse, 426 So.2d 118 (La. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 865 , 104 S.Ct. 202 , 78 L.Ed.2d 176 (1983), reh'g denied, 464 U.S. 1004 , 104 S.Ct. 515 , 78 L.Ed.2d 702 (1983), permitting a police officer to remain in the courtroom throughout the course of the trial and then to testify was found to be a violation of the sequestration rule but, nonetheless, harmless error. | 3 | 1989–1998 |
State v. Narcisse
green
2 sentences1998State v. Narcisse, 426 So.2d 118 (La.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 865 , 104 S.Ct. 202 , 78 L.Ed.2d 176 (1983); State v. Sterling, 95-673 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2/27/96) , 670 So.2d 1316 . 1989In State v. Narcisse, 426 So.2d 118 (La. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 865 , 104 S.Ct. 202 , 78 L.Ed.2d 176 (1983), reh'g denied, 464 U.S. 1004 , 104 S.Ct. 515 , 78 L.Ed.2d 702 (1983), permitting a police officer to remain in the courtroom throughout the course of the trial and then to testify was found to be a violation of the sequestration rule but, nonetheless, harmless error. | 3 | 1989–1998 |
Brooks v. Tennessee
green
2 sentences1993Cf. Brooks v. Tennessee, 406 U.S. 605 , 92 S.Ct. 1891 , 32 L.Ed.2d 358 (1972). 1993Cf. Brooks v. Tennessee, 406 U.S. 605 , 92 S.Ct. 1891 , 32 L.Ed.2d 358 (1972). | 3 | 1978–1993 |
State v. Hornsby
green
2 sentences2009State v. Luquette, 275 So.2d 396 (La.1973); State v. Craighead, 114 La. 84 , 38 So. 28 (1905); State v. Hornsby, 8 Rob. 554 (La.1844). 1996State v. Luquette, 275 So.2d 396 (La.1973); State v. Craighead, 114 La. 84 , 38 So. 28 (1905); *381 State v. Hornsby, 8 Rob. 554 (La.1844). | 2 | 1996–2009 |
State v. Taylor
green
2 sentences2009In State v. Robertson, 97-177, p. 15 (La. 3/4/98), 712 So.2d 8, 23 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 882 , 119 S.Ct. 190 (1998), the supreme court noted that in Taylor, 669 So.2d 364 , it "recognized that even under the previous version of Article 791, a defendant could consent to the waiver of the sequestration requirement." Although capital protections applied to Defendant's case, we find that under Taylor, 669 So.2d 364 , Robertson, 712 So.2d 8 , and La.Code Crim.P. art. 791(B), Defendant could waive sequestration of the jury. 2009In State v. Robertson, 97-177, p. 15 (La. 3/4/98), 712 So.2d 8, 23 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 882 , 119 S.Ct. 190 (1998), the supreme court noted that in Taylor, 669 So.2d 364 , it "recognized that even under the previous version of Article 791, a defendant could consent to the waiver of the sequestration requirement." Although capital protections applied to Defendant's case, we find that under Taylor, 669 So.2d 364 , Robertson, 712 So.2d 8 , and La.Code Crim.P. art. 791(B), Defendant could waive sequestration of the jury. | 2 | 1998–2009 |
State v. Robertson
green
2 sentences2009In State v. Robertson, 97-177, p. 15 (La. 3/4/98), 712 So.2d 8, 23 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 882 , 119 S.Ct. 190 (1998), the supreme court noted that in Taylor, 669 So.2d 364 , it "recognized that even under the previous version of Article 791, a defendant could consent to the waiver of the sequestration requirement." Although capital protections applied to Defendant's case, we find that under Taylor, 669 So.2d 364 , Robertson, 712 So.2d 8 , and La.Code Crim.P. art. 791(B), Defendant could waive sequestration of the jury. 2009In State v. Robertson, 97-177, p. 15 (La. 3/4/98), 712 So.2d 8, 23 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 882 , 119 S.Ct. 190 (1998), the supreme court noted that in Taylor, 669 So.2d 364 , it "recognized that even under the previous version of Article 791, a defendant could consent to the waiver of the sequestration requirement." Although capital protections applied to Defendant's case, we find that under Taylor, 669 So.2d 364 , Robertson, 712 So.2d 8 , and La.Code Crim.P. art. 791(B), Defendant could waive sequestration of the jury. | 2 | 1999–2009 |
State v. Jones
green
2 sentences1996State v. Jones, 354 So.2d 530 (La.1978); State v. Jones, 496 So.2d 638 (La.App. 1 Cir.1986). 1989State v. Jones, supra; State v. Jones, 496 So.2d 638 (La.App. a Cir.1986). | 2 | 1989–1996 |
State v. Ondek
neutral
2 sentences1994State v. Ondek, 584 So.2d 282, 298 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 586 So.2d 539 (La.1991). 1993State v. Ondek, 584 So.2d 282 (La.App. 1st Cir.1991), writ denied, 586 So.2d 539 (La. 1991). | 2 | 1993–1994 |
State v. Lucas
green
1 sentence2020App. 2nd Cir. 3/ 9/ 05), 896 So. 2d 331, 340 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
City of Colton v. American Promotional Events, Inc.-West
neutral
1 sentence2012See, e.g., State v. Dunn, 01-1635 (La.11/01/02), 831 So.2d 862 , appeal after remand, 01-1635 (La.05/11/10), 41 So.3d 454 ; cert. denied, Dunn v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 650 , 178 L.Ed.2d 480 (2010), (in which a proffer was made of the testimony of a witness excluded because of a sequestration violation; a review of the proffer revealed no prejudice to defendant). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Dunn v. Louisiana
neutral
1 sentence2012See, e.g., State v. Dunn, 01-1635 (La.11/01/02), 831 So.2d 862 , appeal after remand, 01-1635 (La.05/11/10), 41 So.3d 454 ; cert. denied, Dunn v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 650 , 178 L.Ed.2d 480 (2010), (in which a proffer was made of the testimony of a witness excluded because of a sequestration violation; a review of the proffer revealed no prejudice to defendant). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Robertson v. Louisiana
green
1 sentence2009In State v. Robertson, 97-177, p. 15 (La. 3/4/98), 712 So.2d 8, 23 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 882 , 119 S.Ct. 190 (1998), the supreme court noted that in Taylor, 669 So.2d 364 , it "recognized that even under the previous version of Article 791, a defendant could consent to the waiver of the sequestration requirement." Although capital protections applied to Defendant's case, we find that under Taylor, 669 So.2d 364 , Robertson, 712 So.2d 8 , and La.Code Crim.P. art. 791(B), Defendant could waive sequestration of the jury. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. DT
green
1 sentence2009Furthermore, in D.T., 998 So.2d 1258, 1264 , this court stated the following: In this case, the State did not seek the death penalty. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Cathcart v. Hopkins
green
1 sentence2009In State v. Robertson, 97-177, p. 15 (La. 3/4/98), 712 So.2d 8, 23 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 882 , 119 S.Ct. 190 (1998), the supreme court noted that in Taylor, 669 So.2d 364 , it "recognized that even under the previous version of Article 791, a defendant could consent to the waiver of the sequestration requirement." Although capital protections applied to Defendant's case, we find that under Taylor, 669 So.2d 364 , Robertson, 712 So.2d 8 , and La.Code Crim.P. art. 791(B), Defendant could waive sequestration of the jury. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Silvio v. Rogers
green
2 sentences2008State v. Parker, 421 So.2d 834 (La.1982); Silvio v. Rogers, 580 So.2d 434 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1991); Williams v. State Farm Mut. 2008Silvio, supra; Coutee v. American Druggist Ins. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Miller
green
1 sentence2006The court rejected the defendant's argument of presumed prejudice, finding that under the facts no such presumption was warranted, and concluded that "[b]ecause no prejudice has been shown, any error here was harmless.C.Cr.P. 921." Id. at 1161 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| State v. Kinsel green | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Kinsel
green
1 sentence2006See La.Code Crim.P. art. 791, La.R.S. 14:42(D)(2)(b), and State v. Kinsel, 00-1610 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/28/01) , 783 So.2d 532 , writ denied, 01-1230 (La.3/28/02), 812 So.2d 641 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| State v. Reyes green | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| State v. Reyes green | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| State v. Spencer green | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| State v. Marshall green | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| State v. Willis green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| State v. Nevers neutral | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| State v. Sterling green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| State v. Maize green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| State v. Maize green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| State v. Parker green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| United States v. Ceccolini green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Brooks v. President of the United States green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Adams v. Mathis green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Whitley v. Beachman green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| State v. Revere green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| Williams v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.