7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Instant Technology, LLC v. Defaziogreen1 sentence2026See, e.g., Instant Technology, LLC v. DeFazio, 40 F. Supp. 3d 989, 1020 (N.D. | 1 | 1 |
Hasek v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.green1 sentence2026See id. (listing the elements of a claim for breach of an express warranty and explaining that a plaintiff asserting such a claim must prove both that a defect in the product at issue caused a malfunctioning “and that the manufacturer failed to repair or replace the parts in accordance with the warranty” (internal quotation omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co.green1 sentence2022Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co., 137 Ill. 2d 222, 266 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Weiss v. Waterhouse Securities, Inc.
green
2 sentences2004What is less clear is, as the appellate court put it, “ [t]he extent to which a plaintiff asserting a claim as a class action must plead the statutory requirements listed in section 2–801.” (Emphasis added.) 335 Ill. 2004What is less clear is, as the appellate court put it, “[t]he extent to which a plaintiff asserting a claim as a class action must plead the statutory requirements listed in section 2 — 801.” (Emphasis added.) 335 Ill. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
McCarthy v. LaSALLE NAT. BANK & TRUST CO.
green
2 sentences2002McCarthy v. LaSalle National Bank & Trust Co. , 230 Ill. 2002McCarthy v. La Salle National Bank & Trust Co., 230 Ill. | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.