pretrial motion bar (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

pretrial motion bar in Illinois

7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2024 5 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Elygreen
illappct · 2018 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024See, e.g., Ely, 2018 IL App (4th) 150906, ¶ 21 (because prejudice was not established, the procedural forfeiture was honored). ¶ 49 B.

11
Illinois State Toll Highway Authority v. Heritage Standard Bank & Trust Co.green
ill · 1994 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022See Illinois State Toll Highway Authority v. Heritage Standard Bank & Trust Co., 163 Ill. 2d 498, 502 (1994) (denial of motion in limine in a civil case does not preserve the issue for appeal if there is no contemporaneous objection at least the first time the evidence is offered at trial); Wingo v. Rockford Memorial Hospital, 292 Ill.

11
WINGO BY WINGO v. Rockford Memorial Hosp.green
illappct · 1997 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022See Illinois State Toll Highway Authority v. Heritage Standard Bank & Trust Co., 163 Ill. 2d 498, 502 (1994) (denial of motion in limine in a civil case does not preserve the issue for appeal if there is no contemporaneous objection at least the first time the evidence is offered at trial); Wingo v. Rockford Memorial Hospital, 292 Ill.

11
People v. Tenneygreen
ill · 2002 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
1 sentence

2021People v. Tenney, 205 Ill. 2d 411, 435 (2002). ¶ 75 In ruling on the State’s pretrial motion to bar McIntosh’s testimony, the court found that McIntosh’s evidence was uncorroborated.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
In re H.L. green
ill · 2015
2 sentences

2024“Where the language [of an Illinois Supreme Court rule] is plain and unambiguous, we may not add provisions not contained therein or read exceptions or limitations into the rule that conflict with the drafters’ expressed intent.” In re H.L., 2015 IL 118529, ¶ 6 , 48 N.E.3d 1071 . -9- ¶ 34 Here, under the express language of Rule 430, the pretrial motion hearing where defendant was shackled was not a “trial proceeding[ ] in which [his] innocence or guilt [was] to be determined” but is, instead, one of those “other instances where [he was] required to appear before the court prior to a trial bei

2024“Where the language [of an Illinois Supreme Court rule] is plain and unambiguous, we may not add provisions not contained therein or read exceptions or limitations into the rule that conflict with the drafters’ expressed intent.” In re H.L., 2015 IL 118529, ¶ 6 , 48 N.E.3d 1071 . -9- ¶ 34 Here, under the express language of Rule 430, the pretrial motion hearing where defendant was shackled was not a “trial proceeding[ ] in which [his] innocence or guilt [was] to be determined” but is, instead, one of those “other instances where [he was] required to appear before the court prior to a trial bei

12024–2024
People v. Thompson green
ill · 2010
1 sentence

2023Thompson, 238 Ill. 2d at 611 .

12023–2023
People v. Ortiz green
ill · 2009
1 sentence

2021Defendant relies on People v. Ortiz, 235 Ill. 2d 319 (2009), for the proposition that newly discovered evidence includes evidence that was unavailable at the first trial. ¶ 76 The State argues that defendant ignores that the trial court here also found, in ruling on the State’s pretrial motion to bar McIntosh’s testimony, that the relationship between Serio and McIntosh was not that of close acquaintances.

12021–2021
Arizona v. Youngblood green
scotus · 1989
2 sentences

1993In Arizona v. Youngblood (1988), 488 U.S. 51 , 102 L.

1993In Arizona v. Youngblood (1988), 488 U.S. 51 , 102 L.

11993–1993
People v. Brownell green
ill · 1980
2 sentences

1993People v. Brownell (1980), 79 Ill. 2d 508, 521 , 404 N.E.2d 181 , cert, dismissed (1980), 449 U.S. 811 , 66 L.

1993People v. Brownell (1980), 79 Ill. 2d 508, 521 , 404 N.E.2d 181 , cert, dismissed (1980), 449 U.S. 811 , 66 L.

11993–1993
District Attorney of Sacramento County v. Sacramento County Civil Service Commission green
scotus · 1980
1 sentence

1993People v. Brownell (1980), 79 Ill. 2d 508, 521 , 404 N.E.2d 181 , cert, dismissed (1980), 449 U.S. 811 , 66 L.

11993–1993
Mobley v. Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services green
scotus · 1980
1 sentence

1993People v. Brownell (1980), 79 Ill. 2d 508, 521 , 404 N.E.2d 181 , cert, dismissed (1980), 449 U.S. 811 , 66 L.

11993–1993

Where else courts name it

MS 31 (1993–2025) NM 8 (2010–2024) GA 7 (2005–2024) SD 7 (1993–2025) MI 7 (1981–2026) IL 7 (1993–2024) TX 6 (1987–2025) MA 6 (1982–2025) KS 6 (1977–2021) AZ 5 (1985–2006) PA 4 (1979–2020) NY 4 (1988–2016) OH 3 (1994–2005) FL 3 (1999–2013) CA 3 (1978–2015) MD 3 (1969–1977) WY 2 (1979–1988) AL 2 (2001–2012) WI 2 (1997–2025) MO 2 (1972–1991) WA 2 (2014–2014) KY 2 (2019–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check