7 Kansas opinions name it 1 courts 1941–1992 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
TRUSTEES OF ENDOWMENT FUND, HOFFMAN MEM. HOSP. v. Kring
green
2 sentences1992Ass'n v. Kring, 225 Kan. 499, 503-04 , 592 P.2d 438 (1979), where the cy-pres doctrine was applied to carry out a grantor’s intent when a trust established by the grantor failed. 1992Ass'n v. Kring, 225 Kan. 499, 503-04 , 592 P.2d 438 (1979), where the cy-pres doctrine was applied to carry out a grantor’s intent when a trust established by the grantor failed. | 2 | 1991–1992 |
In Re the Estate of Coleman
green
2 sentences1991Three decades after Shannep , the Court of Appeals considered the cy pres doctrine in Coleman, 2 Kan. 1991Coleman held that the entity seeking the application of the cy pres doctrine has the burden to demonstrate, either by extrinsic evidence or by evidence within the will itself, that the donor had the requisite general charitable intent. 2 Kan. | 2 | 1979–1991 |
Weeks v. Hyland
neutral
2 sentences1952That the statute was designed to be in force is made clear by our opinion in the case of In re Estate of Weeks, 154 Kan. 103 , 114 P. 2d 857 ; where it was sought, without effect, to be avoided by the doctrine of cy pres. 1952That the statute was designed to be in force is made clear by our opinion in the case of In re Estate of Weeks, 154 Kan. 103 , 114 P. 2d 857 ; where it was sought, without effect, to be avoided by the doctrine of cy pres. | 2 | 1945–1952 |
Shannep v. Strong
green
2 sentences1979In Shannep v. Strong, 160 Kan. 206, 213 , 160 P.2d 683 (1945), this court notes that the cy-pres doctrine is designed to effectuate the intention of the settlor. 1979In Shannep v. Strong, 160 Kan. 206, 213 , 160 P.2d 683 (1945), this court notes that the cy-pres doctrine is designed to effectuate the intention of the settlor. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Smyth v. Anderson
green
2 sentences1979Shannep v. Strong, 160 Kan. at 213 ; Simmons v. Parsons College, 256 N.W.2d 225 (Iowa 1977); Smyth v. Anderson, 238 Ga. 343 , 232 S.E.2d 835 (1977). 1979Shannep v. Strong, 160 Kan. at 213 ; Simmons v. Parsons College, 256 N.W.2d 225 (Iowa 1977); Smyth v. Anderson, 238 Ga. 343 , 232 S.E.2d 835 (1977). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Simmons v. Parsons College
green
1 sentence1979Shannep v. Strong, 160 Kan. at 213 ; Simmons v. Parsons College, 256 N.W.2d 225 (Iowa 1977); Smyth v. Anderson, 238 Ga. 343 , 232 S.E.2d 835 (1977). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
In Re Estate of Woods
green
2 sentences1958(In re Estate of Woods, 181 Kan. 271 , 311 P. 2d 359 .) In the Woods case a general and public charitable trust was created by the clear, unambiguous language in the will of the testator and for that reason we there disregarded the application of the doctrine of cy pres. 1958(In re Estate of Woods, 181 Kan. 271 , 311 P. 2d 359 .) In the Woods case a general and public charitable trust was created by the clear, unambiguous language in the will of the testator and for that reason we there disregarded the application of the doctrine of cy pres. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
In re United States Trust Co.
neutral
1 sentence1941Matter of Hart, 205 App. Div. 703 , 200 N. Y. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.