case presents no reversible error in Texas

2024Appellant’s appointed counsel on appeal has filed a brief stating that the record in this case presents no reversible error and the appeal is without merit and is frivolous.4 See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

2009See Anders, 386 U.S. 738 . 3 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.2 Jack Carter Justice Date Submitted: July 2, 2009 Date Decided: July 3, 2009 Do Not Publish 2 Since we agree this case presents no reversible error, we also, in accordance with Anders, grant counsel's request to withdraw from further representation of Washington in this case.

2026Id. 3 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.2 Charles van Cleef Justice Date Submitted: May 20, 2026 Date Decided: June 11, 2026 Do Not Publish 2 Since we agree that this case presents no reversible error, we also, in accordance with Anders, grant counsel’s request to withdraw from further representation of appellant in this case.

2025Bledsoe, 178 S.W.3d at 826–27. 5 As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.1 Charles van Cleef Justice Date Submitted: October 7, 2025 Date Decided: December 17, 2025 Do Not Publish 1 Since we agree that this case presents no reversible error, we also, in accordance with Anders, grant counsel’s request to withdraw from further representation of appellant in this case.

2026App. 1992) (citing Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 531 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, pet. ref’d.); Asberry, 813 S.W.2d at 530 (“Appellate courts have frequently reformed judgments to correct improper recitations or omissions relating to punishment.”). 3 As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.1 Jeff Rambin Justice Date Submitted: December 29, 2025 Date Decided: June 1, 2026 Do Not Publish 1 Since we agree that this case presents no reversible error, we also, in accordance with Anders, grant counsel’s request to withdraw from further representation of appellant in this case.

2026App. 1992) (citing Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 531 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, pet. ref’d.); Asberry, 813 S.W.2d at 530 (“Appellate courts have frequently reformed judgments to correct improper recitations or omissions relating to punishment.”). 3 As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.1 Jeff Rambin Justice Date Submitted: December 29, 2025 Date Decided: June 1, 2026 Do Not Publish 1 Since we agree that this case presents no reversible error, we also, in accordance with Anders, grant counsel’s request to withdraw from further representation of appellant in this case.

2012Johnson v. State, 885 S.W.2d 641, 646 (Tex. App.—Waco 1994, no pet.) (order) (citing Smith v. State, 814 S.W.2d 858, 859 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1991, no pet.); Cantu v. State, 781 S.W.2d 953, 953 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1989, no pet.)). 2 Since we agree this case presents no reversible error, we also, in accordance with Anders, grant counsel’s request to withdraw from further representation of appellant in this case.

2012Johnson v. State, 885 S.W.2d 641, 646 (Tex. App.—Waco 1994, no pet.) (order) (citing Smith v. State, 814 S.W.2d 858, 859 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1991, no pet.); Cantu v. State, 781 S.W.2d 953, 953 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1989, no pet.)). 2 Since we agree this case presents no reversible error, we also, in accordance with Anders, grant counsel’s request to withdraw from further representation of appellant in this case.

2012Johnson v. State, 885 S.W.2d 641, 646 (Tex. App.—Waco 1994, no pet.) (order) (citing Smith v. State, 814 S.W.2d 858, 859 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1991, no pet.); Cantu v. State, 781 S.W.2d 953, 953 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1989, no pet.)). 2 Since we agree this case presents no reversible error, we also, in accordance with Anders, grant counsel’s request to withdraw from further representation of appellant in this case.