constructive trust doctrine (Maryland) · Go Syfert
← Maryland issues

constructive trust doctrine in Maryland

7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Bass v. Smithgreen
md · 1948 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1970–1970
2 sentences

1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924).

1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924).

22
cluster 669680green
ca4 · 1994 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
2 sentences

2013As a consequence, it found “no trouble determining that the constructive trust claim, which [was] based upon the terms of a property settlement agreement entered to effect a property division upon divorce, meets the ERISA definition of state law,” and was, likely “subject to preemption.” Id. (citing Stiltner v. Beretta U.S.A Corp., 74 F.3d 1473, 1480 (4th Cir.1996), and Elmore v. Cone Mills Corp., 23 F.3d 855, 863 (4th Cir.1994) (en banc)). 10 After concluding that the constructive trust derived out of a potentially conflicting state law claim, it engaged in an analysis of ERISA’s construction

2013Id.

11
James E. Stiltner v. Beretta U.S.A. Corporationgreen
ca4 · 1996 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013As a consequence, it found “no trouble determining that the constructive trust claim, which [was] based upon the terms of a property settlement agreement entered to effect a property division upon divorce, meets the ERISA definition of state law,” and was, likely “subject to preemption.” Id. (citing Stiltner v. Beretta U.S.A Corp., 74 F.3d 1473, 1480 (4th Cir.1996), and Elmore v. Cone Mills Corp., 23 F.3d 855, 863 (4th Cir.1994) (en banc)). 10 After concluding that the constructive trust derived out of a potentially conflicting state law claim, it engaged in an analysis of ERISA’s construction

11
Johnson v. Commonwealthgreen
vactapp · 2005 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006See Johnson, 45 Va.App. at *655 117-18, 609 S.E.2d 58 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (16)

CaseCitedYears
Carter v. Abramo green
md · 1953
2 sentences

1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924).

1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924).

21970–1970
Long v. Huseman neutral
md · 1946
2 sentences

1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924).

1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924).

21970–1970
Trossbach v. Trossbach green
md · 1945
2 sentences

1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924).

1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924).

21970–1970
O'Connor v. Estevez green
md · 1943
2 sentences

1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A.2d 838 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A.2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abramo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A.2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A.2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A.2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A.2d 905 (1945); O'Connor v. Estevez, 182 Md. 541, 555 , 35 A.2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924).

1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924).

21970–1970
Springer v. Springer green
md · 1924
2 sentences

1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924).

1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924).

21970–1970
MacKey v. Davidson neutral
md · 1960
2 sentences

1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A.2d 838 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A.2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abramo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A.2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A.2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A.2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A.2d 905 (1945); O'Connor v. Estevez, 182 Md. 541, 555 , 35 A.2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924).

1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924).

21970–1970
Nowell v. Larrimore green
md · 1954
2 sentences

1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924).

1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924).

21970–1970
Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Ex Rel. Breiner green
scotus · 2001
2 sentences

2013Applying the standard developed by the Supreme Court in Egelhoff, 532 U.S. at 147 , 121 S.Ct. 1322 , and Shaw, 463 U.S. at 97 , 103 S.Ct. 2890 , it concluded that a constructive trust claim against a plan beneficiary obviously maintains a direct effect and connection with an ERISA plan.

2013Applying the standard developed by the Supreme Court in Egelhoff, 532 U.S. at 147 , 121 S.Ct. 1322 , and Shaw, 463 U.S. at 97 , 103 S.Ct. 2890 , it concluded that a constructive trust claim against a plan beneficiary obviously maintains a direct effect and connection with an ERISA plan.

12013–2013
cluster 760479 green
ca4 · 1998
1 sentence

2013Pettit, 164 F.3d at 862 .

12013–2013
Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. green
scotus · 1983
2 sentences

2013Applying the standard developed by the Supreme Court in Egelhoff, 532 U.S. at 147 , 121 S.Ct. 1322 , and Shaw, 463 U.S. at 97 , 103 S.Ct. 2890 , it concluded that a constructive trust claim against a plan beneficiary obviously maintains a direct effect and connection with an ERISA plan.

2013Applying the standard developed by the Supreme Court in Egelhoff, 532 U.S. at 147 , 121 S.Ct. 1322 , and Shaw, 463 U.S. at 97 , 103 S.Ct. 2890 , it concluded that a constructive trust claim against a plan beneficiary obviously maintains a direct effect and connection with an ERISA plan.

12013–2013
Wimmer v. Wimmer green
md · 1980
2 sentences

1995Constructive Trust Appellees argue that the Orphans Court’s allowance of their claims should be affirmed based on the “doctrine of constructive trust.” Appellees cite one case in support of their argument— Hamilton, supra. In Hamilton, 69 Md.App. at 583-84 , 518 A.2d 1087 , we said: A constructive remedy is a remedy employed by the courts to convert the holder of legal title to property into a trustee “for one who in good conscience should reap the benefits of the possession of said property.” Wimmer v. Wimmer, 287 Md. 663 [ 414 A.2d 1254 ] (1980).

1995Constructive Trust Appellees argue that the Orphans Court’s allowance of their claims should be affirmed based on the “doctrine of constructive trust.” Appellees cite one case in support of their argument— Hamilton, supra. In Hamilton, 69 Md.App. at 583-84 , 518 A.2d 1087 , we said: A constructive remedy is a remedy employed by the courts to convert the holder of legal title to property into a trustee “for one who in good conscience should reap the benefits of the possession of said property.” Wimmer v. Wimmer, 287 Md. 663 [ 414 A.2d 1254 ] (1980).

11995–1995
Hamilton v. Caplan green
mdctspecapp · 1987
2 sentences

1995Constructive Trust Appellees argue that the Orphans Court’s allowance of their claims should be affirmed based on the “doctrine of constructive trust.” Appellees cite one case in support of their argument— Hamilton, supra. In Hamilton, 69 Md.App. at 583-84 , 518 A.2d 1087 , we said: A constructive remedy is a remedy employed by the courts to convert the holder of legal title to property into a trustee “for one who in good conscience should reap the benefits of the possession of said property.” Wimmer v. Wimmer, 287 Md. 663 [ 414 A.2d 1254 ] (1980).

1995Constructive Trust Appellees argue that the Orphans Court’s allowance of their claims should be affirmed based on the “doctrine of constructive trust.” Appellees cite one case in support of their argument— Hamilton, supra. In Hamilton, 69 Md.App. at 583-84 , 518 A.2d 1087 , we said: A constructive remedy is a remedy employed by the courts to convert the holder of legal title to property into a trustee “for one who in good conscience should reap the benefits of the possession of said property.” Wimmer v. Wimmer, 287 Md. 663 [ 414 A.2d 1254 ] (1980).

11995–1995
Tenneco Oil Company, a Corporation v. Jim Joiner, D/B/A Joiner Oil Co. green
ca10 · 1982
1 sentence

1991There, the court noted, “The constructive trust claim rests on different facts____” Id. at 776 .

11991–1991
PENINSULA METH. HOMES OF EDUCATION v. Cropper green
md · 1970
2 sentences

1977The constructive trust doctrine is, of course, well-recognized in Maryland law, Peninsula Methodist Homes and Hospitals, Inc. v. Cropper, 256 Md. 728 , 261 A. 2d 787 (1970), having been most recently applied by this Court in Hartsock v. Strong, 21 Md.

1977The constructive trust doctrine is, of course, well-recognized in Maryland law, Peninsula Methodist Homes and Hospitals, Inc. v. Cropper, 256 Md. 728 , 261 A. 2d 787 (1970), having been most recently applied by this Court in Hartsock v. Strong, 21 Md.

11977–1977
Hartsock v. Strong green
mdctspecapp · 1974
2 sentences

1977The constructive trust doctrine is, of course, well-recognized in Maryland law, Peninsula Methodist Homes and Hospitals, Inc. v. Cropper, 256 Md. 728 , 261 A. 2d 787 (1970), having been most recently applied by this Court in Hartsock v. Strong, 21 Md.

1977App. 110 , 318 A. 2d 237 (1974).

11977–1977
Kolker v. Kolker neutral
md · 1960
1 sentence

1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924).

11970–1970

Where else courts name it

NY 52 (1953–2026) TX 31 (1938–2025) FL 10 (1989–2025) OH 7 (1994–2006) MD 7 (1970–2013) CA 6 (1959–2022) AZ 6 (1975–2025) OR 6 (1948–2014) NC 6 (1999–2017) WA 4 (1936–2020) MA 3 (1980–2012) KY 3 (2007–2013) SC 3 (2010–2019) MS 3 (2012–2022) CT 3 (1960–2009) KS 3 (2007–2015) ND 2 (1971–1979) MN 2 (1965–2017) AK 2 (1984–2003) WI 2 (1979–1989) NE 2 (2022–2024) UT 2 (2014–2023) PA 2 (1986–1991) NJ 2 (1955–2019) MO 2 (2005–2021)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check