7 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bass v. Smithgreen2 sentences1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924). 1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924). | 2 | 2 |
cluster 669680green2 sentences2013As a consequence, it found “no trouble determining that the constructive trust claim, which [was] based upon the terms of a property settlement agreement entered to effect a property division upon divorce, meets the ERISA definition of state law,” and was, likely “subject to preemption.” Id. (citing Stiltner v. Beretta U.S.A Corp., 74 F.3d 1473, 1480 (4th Cir.1996), and Elmore v. Cone Mills Corp., 23 F.3d 855, 863 (4th Cir.1994) (en banc)). 10 After concluding that the constructive trust derived out of a potentially conflicting state law claim, it engaged in an analysis of ERISA’s construction 2013Id. | 1 | 1 |
James E. Stiltner v. Beretta U.S.A. Corporationgreen1 sentence2013As a consequence, it found “no trouble determining that the constructive trust claim, which [was] based upon the terms of a property settlement agreement entered to effect a property division upon divorce, meets the ERISA definition of state law,” and was, likely “subject to preemption.” Id. (citing Stiltner v. Beretta U.S.A Corp., 74 F.3d 1473, 1480 (4th Cir.1996), and Elmore v. Cone Mills Corp., 23 F.3d 855, 863 (4th Cir.1994) (en banc)). 10 After concluding that the constructive trust derived out of a potentially conflicting state law claim, it engaged in an analysis of ERISA’s construction | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2006See Johnson, 45 Va.App. at *655 117-18, 609 S.E.2d 58 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Carter v. Abramo
green
2 sentences1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924). 1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924). | 2 | 1970–1970 |
Long v. Huseman
neutral
2 sentences1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924). 1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924). | 2 | 1970–1970 |
Trossbach v. Trossbach
green
2 sentences1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924). 1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924). | 2 | 1970–1970 |
O'Connor v. Estevez
green
2 sentences1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A.2d 838 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A.2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abramo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A.2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A.2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A.2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A.2d 905 (1945); O'Connor v. Estevez, 182 Md. 541, 555 , 35 A.2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924). 1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924). | 2 | 1970–1970 |
Springer v. Springer
green
2 sentences1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924). 1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924). | 2 | 1970–1970 |
MacKey v. Davidson
neutral
2 sentences1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A.2d 838 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A.2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abramo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A.2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A.2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A.2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A.2d 905 (1945); O'Connor v. Estevez, 182 Md. 541, 555 , 35 A.2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924). 1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924). | 2 | 1970–1970 |
Nowell v. Larrimore
green
2 sentences1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924). 1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924). | 2 | 1970–1970 |
Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Ex Rel. Breiner
green
2 sentences2013Applying the standard developed by the Supreme Court in Egelhoff, 532 U.S. at 147 , 121 S.Ct. 1322 , and Shaw, 463 U.S. at 97 , 103 S.Ct. 2890 , it concluded that a constructive trust claim against a plan beneficiary obviously maintains a direct effect and connection with an ERISA plan. 2013Applying the standard developed by the Supreme Court in Egelhoff, 532 U.S. at 147 , 121 S.Ct. 1322 , and Shaw, 463 U.S. at 97 , 103 S.Ct. 2890 , it concluded that a constructive trust claim against a plan beneficiary obviously maintains a direct effect and connection with an ERISA plan. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
cluster 760479
green
1 sentence2013Pettit, 164 F.3d at 862 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
green
2 sentences2013Applying the standard developed by the Supreme Court in Egelhoff, 532 U.S. at 147 , 121 S.Ct. 1322 , and Shaw, 463 U.S. at 97 , 103 S.Ct. 2890 , it concluded that a constructive trust claim against a plan beneficiary obviously maintains a direct effect and connection with an ERISA plan. 2013Applying the standard developed by the Supreme Court in Egelhoff, 532 U.S. at 147 , 121 S.Ct. 1322 , and Shaw, 463 U.S. at 97 , 103 S.Ct. 2890 , it concluded that a constructive trust claim against a plan beneficiary obviously maintains a direct effect and connection with an ERISA plan. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Wimmer v. Wimmer
green
2 sentences1995Constructive Trust Appellees argue that the Orphans Court’s allowance of their claims should be affirmed based on the “doctrine of constructive trust.” Appellees cite one case in support of their argument— Hamilton, supra. In Hamilton, 69 Md.App. at 583-84 , 518 A.2d 1087 , we said: A constructive remedy is a remedy employed by the courts to convert the holder of legal title to property into a trustee “for one who in good conscience should reap the benefits of the possession of said property.” Wimmer v. Wimmer, 287 Md. 663 [ 414 A.2d 1254 ] (1980). 1995Constructive Trust Appellees argue that the Orphans Court’s allowance of their claims should be affirmed based on the “doctrine of constructive trust.” Appellees cite one case in support of their argument— Hamilton, supra. In Hamilton, 69 Md.App. at 583-84 , 518 A.2d 1087 , we said: A constructive remedy is a remedy employed by the courts to convert the holder of legal title to property into a trustee “for one who in good conscience should reap the benefits of the possession of said property.” Wimmer v. Wimmer, 287 Md. 663 [ 414 A.2d 1254 ] (1980). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Hamilton v. Caplan
green
2 sentences1995Constructive Trust Appellees argue that the Orphans Court’s allowance of their claims should be affirmed based on the “doctrine of constructive trust.” Appellees cite one case in support of their argument— Hamilton, supra. In Hamilton, 69 Md.App. at 583-84 , 518 A.2d 1087 , we said: A constructive remedy is a remedy employed by the courts to convert the holder of legal title to property into a trustee “for one who in good conscience should reap the benefits of the possession of said property.” Wimmer v. Wimmer, 287 Md. 663 [ 414 A.2d 1254 ] (1980). 1995Constructive Trust Appellees argue that the Orphans Court’s allowance of their claims should be affirmed based on the “doctrine of constructive trust.” Appellees cite one case in support of their argument— Hamilton, supra. In Hamilton, 69 Md.App. at 583-84 , 518 A.2d 1087 , we said: A constructive remedy is a remedy employed by the courts to convert the holder of legal title to property into a trustee “for one who in good conscience should reap the benefits of the possession of said property.” Wimmer v. Wimmer, 287 Md. 663 [ 414 A.2d 1254 ] (1980). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Tenneco Oil Company, a Corporation v. Jim Joiner, D/B/A Joiner Oil Co.
green
1 sentence1991There, the court noted, “The constructive trust claim rests on different facts____” Id. at 776 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
PENINSULA METH. HOMES OF EDUCATION v. Cropper
green
2 sentences1977The constructive trust doctrine is, of course, well-recognized in Maryland law, Peninsula Methodist Homes and Hospitals, Inc. v. Cropper, 256 Md. 728 , 261 A. 2d 787 (1970), having been most recently applied by this Court in Hartsock v. Strong, 21 Md. 1977The constructive trust doctrine is, of course, well-recognized in Maryland law, Peninsula Methodist Homes and Hospitals, Inc. v. Cropper, 256 Md. 728 , 261 A. 2d 787 (1970), having been most recently applied by this Court in Hartsock v. Strong, 21 Md. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Hartsock v. Strong
green
2 sentences1977The constructive trust doctrine is, of course, well-recognized in Maryland law, Peninsula Methodist Homes and Hospitals, Inc. v. Cropper, 256 Md. 728 , 261 A. 2d 787 (1970), having been most recently applied by this Court in Hartsock v. Strong, 21 Md. 1977App. 110 , 318 A. 2d 237 (1974). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Kolker v. Kolker
neutral
1 sentence1970Mackey v. Davidson, 222 Md. 197, 205 , 159 A. 2d 833 (1960); Nowell v. Larrimore, 205 Md. 613, 621 , 109 A. 2d 747 (1954); Carter v. Abromo, 201 Md. 339, 343 , 93 A. 2d 546 (1953); Bass v. Smith, 189 Md. 461, 470, 471 , 56 A. 2d 800 (1948); Long v. Huseman, 186 Md. 495, 507 , 47 A. 2d 75 (1946); Trossbach v. Trossbach, 185 Md. 47, 52 , 42 A. 2d 905 (1945); O’Connor v. Estevez, 132 Md. 541 , 555, 35 A. 2d 148 (1943); Springer v. Springer, 144 Md. 465, 479 , 125 A. 162 (1924). | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.