7 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wilsongreen2 sentences2024The records must be “authenticated by a witness who is familiar with them and the system under which they are made.” State v. Wilson, 313 N.C. 516, 533 , 330 S.E.2d 450, 462 (1985) (citations omitted). 2024The records must be “authenticated by a witness who is familiar with them and the system under which they are made.” State v. Wilson, 313 N.C. 516, 533 , 330 S.E.2d 450, 462 (1985) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Canadygreen2 sentences2020The purpose of preservation rules “is to require a party to call the court’s attention to a matter upon which he or she wants a ruling before he or she can assign error to the matter on appeal.” State v. Canady, 330 N.C. 398, 401 , 410 S.E.2d 875, 878 (1991). 2020The purpose of preservation rules “is to require a party to call the court’s attention to a matter upon which he or she wants a ruling before he or she can assign error to the matter on appeal.” State v. Canady, 330 N.C. 398, 401 , 410 S.E.2d 875, 878 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re SDJ
green
2 sentences2022App. 478 , 665 S.E.2d 818 (2008), this Court held that the results of a drug test were properly admitted under the business record exception to the hearsay rule. 2022App. 478 , 665 S.E.2d 818 (2008), this Court held that the results of a drug test were properly admitted under the business record exception to the hearsay rule. | 2 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Sharpe
green
2 sentences2020Finally, although the trial court made a thorough ruling, it did not specifically respond to an argument that the statement was not hearsay because it was a command, instead ruling that it was irrelevant whether it was made in Defendant Bradsher’s official capacity and that it was not subject to a business record exception. “[Our] Court[s] ha[ve] long held that where a theory argued on appeal was not raised before the trial court, ‘the law does not permit parties to swap horses between courts in order to get a better mount . . . .” State v. Sharpe, 344 N.C. 190 , 473 S.E.2d 3 (1996) (citation 2020Finally, although the trial court made a thorough ruling, it did not specifically respond to an argument that the statement was not hearsay because it was a command, instead ruling that it was irrelevant whether it was made in Defendant Bradsher’s official capacity and that it was not subject to a business record exception. “[Our] Court[s] ha[ve] long held that where a theory argued on appeal was not raised before the trial court, ‘the law does not permit parties to swap horses between courts in order to get a better mount . . . .” State v. Sharpe, 344 N.C. 190 , 473 S.E.2d 3 (1996) (citation | 2 | 2020–2020 |
In re: C.B., D.B.
green
1 sentence2025In re C.R.B., 245 N.C. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Cooper v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences2011While our appellate courts have not previously specifically ruled on whether information obtained from the NCIC database falls under the business record exception to the hearsay rule, the Virginia Court of Appeals addressed the issue in Cooper v. Commonwealth, 54 Va. App. 558 , 680 S.E.2d 361 (2009). 2011While our appellate courts have not previously specifically ruled on whether information obtained from the NCIC database falls under the business record exception to the hearsay rule, the Virginia Court of Appeals addressed the issue in Cooper v. Commonwealth, 54 Va. App. 558 , 680 S.E.2d 361 (2009). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.