Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Flowers v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Dillon v. Greenbriar Digging Serv., Ltd., 919 So.2d 172, 175 (¶ 8) (Miss.Ct.App.2005) (citing Flowers v. State, 773 So.2d 309, 322 (¶ 72) (Miss.2000)). 2014However, because Detective Carlson was not the officer who interviewed Hawthorne, the circuit court judge found the impeachment attempt improper.- See Flowers, 773 So.2d at 326 (¶¶ 57-58) (citing Rule 613 of the Mississippi Rules of Evidence and providing guidelines for the proper impeachment of a witness by a prior inconsistent statement). ¶ 38. | 4 | 4 |
Dillon v. Greenbriar Digging Service, Ltd.green2 sentences2015See Dillon v. Greenbriar Digging Serv., Ltd., 919 So.2d 172, 175-76 (¶¶ 8-10) (Miss.Ct.App.2005) (affirming the admission of an inspection report, which had been prepared by a different inspector than the one offering it into evidence, because it met the requirements of the business-record exception). 2015Dillon v. Greenbriar Digging Serv., Ltd., 919 So.2d 172, 175 (¶ 8) (Miss.Ct.App.2005) (citing Flowers v. State, 773 So.2d 309, 322 (¶ 72) (Miss.2000)). | 1 | 1 |
Bingham v. Stategreen1 sentence2014By pursuing this line of questioning, Anderson argues that he could have shown the discrepancies that existed between the witnesses’ prior statements to police and their testimony at trial, thereby effectively impeaching their testimony. ¶ 34. “[I]t is well settled that the relevancy and admissibility of evidence are within the trial court’s discretion^] and reversal may be had only where that discretion has been abused.” Bingham v. State, 723 So.2d 1189, 1191 (¶ 9) (Miss.Ct. | 1 | 1 |
Copeland v. City of Jacksongreen2 sentences2014In Copeland v. City of Jackson, 548 So.2d 970, 975 (Miss.1989), the supreme court held that police reports prepared during the investigation of an accident were admissible pursuant to the business-record exception. 2014Although the officer who filed the report had died, “the Chief of Police for the City of Jackson testified at length that the report ... was prepared in the regular course of [the officer’s] duties as a police officer.” Id. | 1 | 1 |
Keyes v. Stategreen1 sentence2012To be sentenced as a habitual offender, “[a]ll that is required is that the accused be properly indicted as [a] habitual offender, that the prosecution prove the prior offenses by competent evidence, and that the defendant be given a reasonable opportunity to challenge the prosecution’s proof.” Keyes v. State, 549 So.2d 949, 951 (Miss.1989) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Stategreen1 sentence2006An opinion in the report is admissible "so long as `the conclusion is based on a factual investigation and satisfies the Rule's trust-worthiness requirement.'" Jones v. State, 918 So.2d 1220, 1231 (Miss.2005) (quoting Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey, 488 U.S. 153, 170 , 109 S.Ct. 439 , 102 L.Ed.2d 445 (1988)). | 1 | 1 |
Weeks v. Stategreen1 sentence2000Weeks v. State, 493 So.2d 1280, 1284-85 (Miss.1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bullcoming v. New Mexico
green
1 sentence2019Bullcoming, 564 U.S. at 652 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Cabrere v. State
green
1 sentence2014Mississippi 920 So.2d 1062 [ (Miss.Ct.App.2006) ], clearly indicates that in this particular case a radio log was admissible as a business record exception of the hearsay rule[.] Also the Mississippi Supreme Court held that a transcript of the 911 call fell under the present sense impression to the hearsay rule, as well to the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey
green
2 sentences2006An opinion in the report is admissible "so long as `the conclusion is based on a factual investigation and satisfies the Rule's trust-worthiness requirement.'" Jones v. State, 918 So.2d 1220, 1231 (Miss.2005) (quoting Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey, 488 U.S. 153, 170 , 109 S.Ct. 439 , 102 L.Ed.2d 445 (1988)). 2006An opinion in the report is admissible "so long as `the conclusion is based on a factual investigation and satisfies the Rule's trust-worthiness requirement.'" Jones v. State, 918 So.2d 1220, 1231 (Miss.2005) (quoting Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey, 488 U.S. 153, 170 , 109 S.Ct. 439 , 102 L.Ed.2d 445 (1988)). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Johnson v. State
green
1 sentence1986Johnson v. State, 476 So.2d 1195 (Miss. 1985). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.