Robert issue in Nebraska

2025SCOTT Cite as 319 Neb. 877 Otherwise, Robert’s motion was overruled.

2025SCOTT Cite as 319 Neb. 877 depression lasts for a “short term” after a child’s birth, and that Robert’s own psychological evaluation revealed anxiety, depression, anger, and “significant histrionic and narcissistic personality features/style.” Nor are we persuaded by Robert’s claim that the district court erred in relying on Blotcky’s testimony to “find[] paren- tal alienation.” 18 Robert points to evidence he claims shows that he did not engage in parental alienation, but that Rebecca did.

2021Finally, the court found no genuine issue of material fact regarding Robert’s claim that Bohling’s will was the product 4 See In re Estate of Wagner, 246 Neb. 625 , 522 N.W.2d 159 (1994). - 633 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports BOHLING v. BOHLING Cite as 309 Neb. 625 of Kimberly’s undue influence.

2021Finally, the court found no genuine issue of material fact regarding Robert’s claim that Bohling’s will was the product 4 See In re Estate of Wagner, 246 Neb. 625 , 522 N.W.2d 159 (1994). - 633 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports BOHLING v. BOHLING Cite as 309 Neb. 625 of Kimberly’s undue influence.

2021Finally, the court found no genuine issue of material fact regarding Robert’s claim that Bohling’s will was the product 4 See In re Estate of Wagner, 246 Neb. 625 , 522 N.W.2d 159 (1994). - 633 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports BOHLING v. BOHLING Cite as 309 Neb. 625 of Kimberly’s undue influence.

2020Two days after the - 970 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 304 Nebraska Reports BOHLING v. BOHLING Cite as 304 Neb. 968 county court entered an order noting Robert’s objection, Robert filed a notice of transfer to district court.1 Kimberly filed addi- tional pleadings in the county court, and shortly thereafter, the county court clerk certified the will contest proceeding to the district court.

2017Betty’s trust thus ultimately distributed all her property and all the property from Robert’s Trust A to Robert’s issue. 5 Id. 6 Id. 7 In re Estate of Muchemore, 252 Neb. 119 , 560 N.W.2d 477 (1997), disapproved on other grounds, In re Estate of Nelson, 253 Neb. 414 , 571 N.W.2d 269 (1997). - 572 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 296 Nebraska R eports IN RE ROBERT L.

2017Betty’s trust thus ultimately distributed all her property and all the property from Robert’s Trust A to Robert’s issue. 5 Id. 6 Id. 7 In re Estate of Muchemore, 252 Neb. 119 , 560 N.W.2d 477 (1997), disapproved on other grounds, In re Estate of Nelson, 253 Neb. 414 , 571 N.W.2d 269 (1997). - 572 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 296 Nebraska R eports IN RE ROBERT L.

2017Betty’s trust thus ultimately distributed all her property and all the property from Robert’s Trust A to Robert’s issue. 5 Id. 6 Id. 7 In re Estate of Muchemore, 252 Neb. 119 , 560 N.W.2d 477 (1997), disapproved on other grounds, In re Estate of Nelson, 253 Neb. 414 , 571 N.W.2d 269 (1997). - 572 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 296 Nebraska R eports IN RE ROBERT L.

2017Betty’s trust thus ultimately distributed all her property and all the property from Robert’s Trust A to Robert’s issue. 5 Id. 6 Id. 7 In re Estate of Muchemore, 252 Neb. 119 , 560 N.W.2d 477 (1997), disapproved on other grounds, In re Estate of Nelson, 253 Neb. 414 , 571 N.W.2d 269 (1997). - 572 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 296 Nebraska R eports IN RE ROBERT L.

2017Betty’s trust thus ultimately distributed all her property and all the property from Robert’s Trust A to Robert’s issue. 5 Id. 6 Id. 7 In re Estate of Muchemore, 252 Neb. 119 , 560 N.W.2d 477 (1997), disapproved on other grounds, In re Estate of Nelson, 253 Neb. 414 , 571 N.W.2d 269 (1997). - 572 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 296 Nebraska R eports IN RE ROBERT L.

2017Betty’s trust thus ultimately distributed all her property and all the property from Robert’s Trust A to Robert’s issue. 5 Id. 6 Id. 7 In re Estate of Muchemore, 252 Neb. 119 , 560 N.W.2d 477 (1997), disapproved on other grounds, In re Estate of Nelson, 253 Neb. 414 , 571 N.W.2d 269 (1997). - 572 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 296 Nebraska R eports IN RE ROBERT L.

2016Robert showed that Kyel had previously failed - 461 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 294 Nebraska R eports HOPKINS v. HOPKINS Cite as 294 Neb. 417 to protect her daughters from a sex offender and had will- fully refused to face the risk posed to her daughters by giving another sex offender unsupervised access to them.

2016BANK & TRUST CO. v. WATSON Cite as 293 Neb. 943 • July 8, 2015: Court of Appeals dismissed the first appeal, concluding that the summary judgment order was not final and appealable, because Shona’s cross-claim against Robert was still pending. • July 17, 2015: Robert filed motion in district court to vacate the summary judgment order. • August 25, 2015: District court dismissed Shona’s cross- claim and overruled Robert’s motion to vacate. • September 17, 2015: Robert filed notice of the third appeal, which was taken from the summary judgment order and the order overruling his motion to vac

2016BANK & TRUST CO. v. WATSON Cite as 293 Neb. 943 appropriate for consideration on appeal.39 Thus, in consider- ing this assignment of error, we are limited by the scope of Robert’s motion.

2016In Nebraska, a party may not simply move the court for a declaratory judgment.35 33 Steinhausen v. HomeServices of Neb., 289 Neb. 927 , 857 N.W.2d 816 (2015). 34 See id. 35 Breci v. St.

2013STANDARD OF REVIEW [1] A jurisdictional question which does not involve a fac- tual dispute is determined by an appellate court as a matter of Decisions of the Nebraska Court of Appeals MUZZEY v. RAGONE 675 Cite as 20 Neb.