psychological hearing in Pennsylvania

7 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1986–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
Commonwealth v. Samgreen pa · 1993 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010See Commonwealth v. Sam, 535 Pa. 350 , 635 A.2d 603 (1993) (holding that the failure of trial counsel to present mitigating evidence did not constitute ineffectiveness when the defendant directed counsel not to present such evidence). [28] To elaborate, we offer the following exchange: THE COMMONWEALTH: Sir, did you have some concern as a counselor of the law that raising a psychological defense or introducing expert testimony of a psychologist could possibly open the door to the Commonwealth being able to introduce other acts of Mr. Martin outside of those he was charged with in this trial? 2010See Commonwealth v. Sam, 535 Pa. 350 , 635 A.2d 603 (1993) (holding that the failure of trial counsel to present mitigating evidence did not constitute ineffectiveness when the defendant directed counsel not to present such evidence). [28] To elaborate, we offer the following exchange: THE COMMONWEALTH: Sir, did you have some concern as a counselor of the law that raising a psychological defense or introducing expert testimony of a psychologist could possibly open the door to the Commonwealth being able to introduce other acts of Mr. Martin outside of those he was charged with in this trial?	2	2
Commonwealth v. Selenskigreen pasuperct · 2015 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 1 sentence 2017Cf. Selenski, 117 A.3d at 1284 (addressing Walker claim and remanding for hearing where defendant attempted to admit expert testimony from “a leading expert on human memory, concerning the psychological factors that influence the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.”).	1	1
People v. Bledsoegreen cal · 1984 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986 2 sentences 1986See also People v. Bledsoe, 36 Cal.3d 236 , 203 Cal.Rptr. 450 , 681 P.2d 291 (1984) (court rejected RTS evidence of non-medical experts; no discussion of qualifications); State v. Saldana, 324 N.W.2d 227 (Minn. 1982) (court rejected RTS evidence for reasons, inter alia, that witness was not qualified); State v. Whitman, 16 Ohio App.3d 246 , 475 N.E.2d 486 (1984) (court appears to approve psychiatric testimony and reject unqualified social worker testimony). [5] Recently, the California Supreme Court which had rejected rape trauma syndrome evidence ( People v. Bledsoe, supra . ) approved the us 1986See also People v. Bledsoe, 36 Cal.3d 236 , 203 Cal.Rptr. 450 , 681 P.2d 291 (1984) (court rejected RTS evidence of non-medical experts; no discussion of qualifications); State v. Saldana, 324 N.W.2d 227 (Minn. 1982) (court rejected RTS evidence for reasons, inter alia, that witness was not qualified); State v. Whitman, 16 Ohio App.3d 246 , 475 N.E.2d 486 (1984) (court appears to approve psychiatric testimony and reject unqualified social worker testimony). [5] Recently, the California Supreme Court which had rejected rape trauma syndrome evidence ( People v. Bledsoe, supra . ) approved the us	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

Case	Cited	Years
Ford Ex Rel. Pringle v. PA. HOUSING AUTH. green pacommwct · 2001 1 sentence 2003TESTIMONY OF THEODORE LIDSKY, PH.D Finally, PHA argues that Dr. Lid-sky was incompetent to testify because his testimony was based upon a psychological test that he administered to McIntyre in violation of the PPPA. 21 Dr. Lidsky’s competency to testify was decided by this Court in Ford v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 789 A.2d 360 (Pa. Cmwlth.2001), appeal denied, 569 Pa. 696 , 803 A.2d 736 (2002).	1	2003–2003
Graham v. West Virginia green scotus · 1912 2 sentences 1998However, the Court then found that the psychological hearing was a separate criminal proceeding on a distinctly new factual issue leading to separate criminal punishment: The case is not unlike those other recidivist statutes where an habitual criminal issue is ‘a distinct issue’ (Graham v. West Virginia, 224 U.S. 616, 625 , 32 S.Ct. 583 ) on which a defendant ‘must receive reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard.’ Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448, 452 , 82 S.Ct. 501 , 7 L.Ed.2d 446 ; Chandler v. Fretag, 348 U.S. 3, 8 , 75 S.Ct. 1 . 1998However, the Court then found that the psychological hearing was a separate criminal proceeding on a distinctly new factual issue leading to separate criminal punishment: The case is not unlike those other recidivist statutes where an habitual criminal issue is ‘a distinct issue’ (Graham v. West Virginia, 224 U.S. 616, 625 , 32 S.Ct. 583 ) on which a defendant ‘must receive reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard.’ Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448, 452 , 82 S.Ct. 501 , 7 L.Ed.2d 446 ; Chandler v. Fretag, 348 U.S. 3, 8 , 75 S.Ct. 1 .	1	1998–1998
Chandler v. Warden Fretag green scotus · 1954 2 sentences 1998However, the Court then found that the psychological hearing was a separate criminal proceeding on a distinctly new factual issue leading to separate criminal punishment: The case is not unlike those other recidivist statutes where an habitual criminal issue is ‘a distinct issue’ (Graham v. West Virginia, 224 U.S. 616, 625 , 32 S.Ct. 583 ) on which a defendant ‘must receive reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard.’ Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448, 452 , 82 S.Ct. 501 , 7 L.Ed.2d 446 ; Chandler v. Fretag, 348 U.S. 3, 8 , 75 S.Ct. 1 . 1998However, the Court then found that the psychological hearing was a separate criminal proceeding on a distinctly new factual issue leading to separate criminal punishment: The case is not unlike those other recidivist statutes where an habitual criminal issue is ‘a distinct issue’ (Graham v. West Virginia, 224 U.S. 616, 625 , 32 S.Ct. 583 ) on which a defendant ‘must receive reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard.’ Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448, 452 , 82 S.Ct. 501 , 7 L.Ed.2d 446 ; Chandler v. Fretag, 348 U.S. 3, 8 , 75 S.Ct. 1 .	1	1998–1998
Oyler v. Boles green scotus · 1962 2 sentences 1998However, the Court then found that the psychological hearing was a separate criminal proceeding on a distinctly new factual issue leading to separate criminal punishment: The case is not unlike those other recidivist statutes where an habitual criminal issue is ‘a distinct issue’ (Graham v. West Virginia, 224 U.S. 616, 625 , 32 S.Ct. 583 ) on which a defendant ‘must receive reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard.’ Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448, 452 , 82 S.Ct. 501 , 7 L.Ed.2d 446 ; Chandler v. Fretag, 348 U.S. 3, 8 , 75 S.Ct. 1 . 1998However, the Court then found that the psychological hearing was a separate criminal proceeding on a distinctly new factual issue leading to separate criminal punishment: The case is not unlike those other recidivist statutes where an habitual criminal issue is ‘a distinct issue’ (Graham v. West Virginia, 224 U.S. 616, 625 , 32 S.Ct. 583 ) on which a defendant ‘must receive reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard.’ Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448, 452 , 82 S.Ct. 501 , 7 L.Ed.2d 446 ; Chandler v. Fretag, 348 U.S. 3, 8 , 75 S.Ct. 1 .	1	1998–1998
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green green scotus · 1973 2 sentences 1987If the document is given credence and considered relevant to conditions at the time of Hodge's employment, the Commission would have to disregard substantial evidence to find that Hodge was qualified. [1] McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 , 101 S.Ct. 1089 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981); United States Postal Service v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711 , 103 S.Ct. 1478 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983). [2] The Commonwealth Court summarized the HRC's finding that the employer's proferred reasons for discharge 1987If the document is given credence and considered relevant to conditions at the time of Hodge's employment, the Commission would have to disregard substantial evidence to find that Hodge was qualified. [1] McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 , 101 S.Ct. 1089 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981); United States Postal Service v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711 , 103 S.Ct. 1478 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983). [2] The Commonwealth Court summarized the HRC's finding that the employer's proferred reasons for discharge	1	1987–1987
United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens green scotus · 1983 2 sentences 1987If the document is given credence and considered relevant to conditions at the time of Hodge's employment, the Commission would have to disregard substantial evidence to find that Hodge was qualified. [1] McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 , 101 S.Ct. 1089 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981); United States Postal Service v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711 , 103 S.Ct. 1478 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983). [2] The Commonwealth Court summarized the HRC's finding that the employer's proferred reasons for discharge 1987If the document is given credence and considered relevant to conditions at the time of Hodge's employment, the Commission would have to disregard substantial evidence to find that Hodge was qualified. [1] McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 , 101 S.Ct. 1089 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981); United States Postal Service v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711 , 103 S.Ct. 1478 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983). [2] The Commonwealth Court summarized the HRC's finding that the employer's proferred reasons for discharge	1	1987–1987
Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine green scotus · 1981 2 sentences 1987If the document is given credence and considered relevant to conditions at the time of Hodge's employment, the Commission would have to disregard substantial evidence to find that Hodge was qualified. [1] McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 , 101 S.Ct. 1089 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981); United States Postal Service v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711 , 103 S.Ct. 1478 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983). [2] The Commonwealth Court summarized the HRC's finding that the employer's proferred reasons for discharge 1987If the document is given credence and considered relevant to conditions at the time of Hodge's employment, the Commission would have to disregard substantial evidence to find that Hodge was qualified. [1] McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 , 101 S.Ct. 1089 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981); United States Postal Service v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711 , 103 S.Ct. 1478 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983). [2] The Commonwealth Court summarized the HRC's finding that the employer's proferred reasons for discharge	1	1987–1987
State v. Saldana green minn · 1982 1 sentence 1986See also People v. Bledsoe, 36 Cal.3d 236 , 203 Cal.Rptr. 450 , 681 P.2d 291 (1984) (court rejected RTS evidence of non-medical experts; no discussion of qualifications); State v. Saldana, 324 N.W.2d 227 (Minn. 1982) (court rejected RTS evidence for reasons, inter alia, that witness was not qualified); State v. Whitman, 16 Ohio App.3d 246 , 475 N.E.2d 486 (1984) (court appears to approve psychiatric testimony and reject unqualified social worker testimony). [5] Recently, the California Supreme Court which had rejected rape trauma syndrome evidence ( People v. Bledsoe, supra . ) approved the us	1	1986–1986
State v. Whitman green ohioctapp · 1984 2 sentences 1986See also People v. Bledsoe, 36 Cal.3d 236 , 203 Cal.Rptr. 450 , 681 P.2d 291 (1984) (court rejected RTS evidence of non-medical experts; no discussion of qualifications); State v. Saldana, 324 N.W.2d 227 (Minn. 1982) (court rejected RTS evidence for reasons, inter alia, that witness was not qualified); State v. Whitman, 16 Ohio App.3d 246 , 475 N.E.2d 486 (1984) (court appears to approve psychiatric testimony and reject unqualified social worker testimony). [5] Recently, the California Supreme Court which had rejected rape trauma syndrome evidence ( People v. Bledsoe, supra . ) approved the us 1986See also People v. Bledsoe, 36 Cal.3d 236 , 203 Cal.Rptr. 450 , 681 P.2d 291 (1984) (court rejected RTS evidence of non-medical experts; no discussion of qualifications); State v. Saldana, 324 N.W.2d 227 (Minn. 1982) (court rejected RTS evidence for reasons, inter alia, that witness was not qualified); State v. Whitman, 16 Ohio App.3d 246 , 475 N.E.2d 486 (1984) (court appears to approve psychiatric testimony and reject unqualified social worker testimony). [5] Recently, the California Supreme Court which had rejected rape trauma syndrome evidence ( People v. Bledsoe, supra . ) approved the us	1	1986–1986

Where else courts name it

CA 46 (1981–2025) NY 12 (1938–2026) NJ 10 (1979–2020) OH 8 (2000–2022) PA 7 (1986–2017) FL 7 (1995–2026) LA 6 (1983–2020) MI 6 (1973–2025) CT 4 (1976–2023) TN 3 (2004–2020) NC 3 (1990–2003) IL 3 (1968–2009) WY 3 (1984–1989) NM 2 (2012–2020) WV 2 (1993–2023) MD 2 (1967–2004) KS 2 (1972–1986) RI 2 (1996–2016) MA 2 (1993–2010) AZ 2 (1983–1983) DC 2 (1991–2014) OR 2 (1993–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check