7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lewis v. METROPOLITAN S. & L. ASS'Ngreen2 sentences2024An agency decision is arbitrary when it denies parties due process of law, see Lewis v. Metro Savs. & Loan Ass’n, 550 S.W.2d 11, 16 (Tex. 1977), or fails to show a connection between the agency decision and the factors that are made relevant to that decision by the applicable statutes and regulations, see Pub. 2001An agency decision is arbitrary when its final order denies parties due process of law, see Lewis v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'n, 550 S.W.2d 11, 16 (Tex. 1977), or fails to demonstrate a connection between the agency decision and the factors that are made relevant to that decision by the applicable statutes and regulations, see Gulf States Utilities , 809 S.W.2d at 202 . | 3 | 3 |
Occidental Permian Ltd. v. Railroad Commissiongreen2 sentences2008Occidental Permian Ltd. v. Railroad Comm’n of Tex., 47 S.W.3d 801, 806 (Tex.App.-Austin 2001, no pet.). 2007Occidental Permian Ltd. v. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. , 47 S.W.3d 801, 806 (Tex. App.--Austin 2001, no pet.). | 3 | 3 |
Cadle Co. v. Estate of Weavergreen1 sentence2015Comm’n, 883 S.W.2d 179, 184 (Tex. 1994). 23 that decision by the applicable statutes and regulations.”47 More directly, our Supreme Court has stated that “if the Commission has failed to follow the clear, unambiguous language of its own regulation, we must reverse its action as arbitrary and capricious.”48 Pages 20-22 of OPUC’s Appellant’s brief discusses why costs related to the 1997 ice storm were in fact reasonably anticipated, including that much of the damage was found by the Commission to have been caused by imprudent vegetation management. | 1 | 1 |
Texas Health Facilities Commission v. Presbyterian Hospital Northgreen1 sentence2015This Court has stated that an agency decision is arbitrary when its final order “fails to demonstrate a connection between the agency decision and the factors that are made relevant to 45 See Texas Health Facilities Comm’n v. Presbyterian Hospital North, 690 S.W.2d 564, 566 (Tex. 1985); See also Finder v. Texas Medical Bd., 2010 WL 4670510 *6 (Tex. App.—Austin, pet. denied) (“The findings of fact in Dr. Finder's case do not require the inferential leap necessary in Presbyterian Hospital.”). 46 City of El Paso v. Public Util. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Public Utility Commission v. Gulf States Utilities Co.
green
2 sentences2001An agency decision is arbitrary when its final order denies parties due process of law, see Lewis v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass’n, 550 S.W.2d 11, 16 (Tex.1977), or fails to demonstrate a connection between the agency decision and the factors that are made relevant to that decision by the applicable statutes and regulations, see Gulf States Utilities, 809 S.W.2d at 202 . 2001An agency decision is arbitrary when its final order denies parties due process of law, see Lewis v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'n, 550 S.W.2d 11, 16 (Tex. 1977), or fails to demonstrate a connection between the agency decision and the factors that are made relevant to that decision by the applicable statutes and regulations, see Gulf States Utilities , 809 S.W.2d at 202 . | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.