7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Collinsgreen1 sentence2021See id. | 1 | 1 |
Peter C. Browning v. Jeff P. Prostokgreen1 sentence2015Co. v. Joachim, 315 S.W.3d 860, 863 (Tex. 2010) (quoting Browning v. Prostok, 165 S.W.3d 336, 346 (Tex. 2005)). 1 The inapplicability of the State’s many assertions of waiver are addressed in Section V, infra. 2 “[A] trial court may not grant relief to a party in the absence of pleadings to support that relief.” Moreno v. Moore, 897 S.W.2d 439, 442 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1995, no writ) (declaring the portion of the judgment which purported to grant a family violence protective order void and dissolved because the pleadings did not invoke the provision of the Texas Family Code which permitte | 1 | 1 |
Travelers Insurance Co. v. Joachimgreen1 sentence2015Co. v. Joachim, 315 S.W.3d 860, 863 (Tex. 2010) (quoting Browning v. Prostok, 165 S.W.3d 336, 346 (Tex. 2005)). 1 The inapplicability of the State’s many assertions of waiver are addressed in Section V, infra. 2 “[A] trial court may not grant relief to a party in the absence of pleadings to support that relief.” Moreno v. Moore, 897 S.W.2d 439, 442 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1995, no writ) (declaring the portion of the judgment which purported to grant a family violence protective order void and dissolved because the pleadings did not invoke the provision of the Texas Family Code which permitte | 1 | 1 |
Moreno v. Mooregreen1 sentence2015Co. v. Joachim, 315 S.W.3d 860, 863 (Tex. 2010) (quoting Browning v. Prostok, 165 S.W.3d 336, 346 (Tex. 2005)). 1 The inapplicability of the State’s many assertions of waiver are addressed in Section V, infra. 2 “[A] trial court may not grant relief to a party in the absence of pleadings to support that relief.” Moreno v. Moore, 897 S.W.2d 439, 442 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1995, no writ) (declaring the portion of the judgment which purported to grant a family violence protective order void and dissolved because the pleadings did not invoke the provision of the Texas Family Code which permitte | 1 | 1 |
State Ex Rel. Protection of Cockerham v. Cockerhamgreen1 sentence2015Co. v. Joachim, 315 S.W.3d 860, 863 (Tex. 2010) (quoting Browning v. Prostok, 165 S.W.3d 336, 346 (Tex. 2005)). 1 The inapplicability of the State’s many assertions of waiver are addressed in Section V, infra. 2 “[A] trial court may not grant relief to a party in the absence of pleadings to support that relief.” Moreno v. Moore, 897 S.W.2d 439, 442 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1995, no writ) (declaring the portion of the judgment which purported to grant a family violence protective order void and dissolved because the pleadings did not invoke the provision of the Texas Family Code which permitte | 1 | 1 |
Marin v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See, e.g., Marin v. State, 851 S.W.2d 275, 279-80 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hammack v. Public Utility Com'n of Texas
green
2 sentences2010Id. at 733 . 2010Id. at 733 . | 3 | 2010–2010 |
High v. State
green
1 sentence1989If it is intended to be an “Anders ” brief, it fails to comply with the requirement that such a brief must “contain a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.” High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App.1978). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.