7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2009–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Speergreen2 sentences2016In civil proceedings, unlike criminal ones, there is no right to make a blanket assertion of the privilege against self-incrimination and refuse to answer any questions.17 16 Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 , 444–45 (1972) (noting also that the privilege “protects against any disclosures that the witness reasonably believes could be used in a criminal prosecution or could lead to other evidence that might be so used”). 17 See Allen v. Illinois, 478 U.S. 364, 375 (1986); Murray v. Texas Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 294 S.W.3d 360, 366 (Tex. App.—Austin 2009, no pet.); In re Spee 2009See Allen, 478 U.S. 364 at 375 , 106 S.Ct. 2988 ; Browning, 113 S.W.3d at 862 ; In re Speer, 965 S.W.2d 41, 46 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1998, orig. proceeding). | 4 | 4 |
Allen v. Illinoisgreen2 sentences2016In civil proceedings, unlike criminal ones, there is no right to make a blanket assertion of the privilege against self-incrimination and refuse to answer any questions.17 16 Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 , 444–45 (1972) (noting also that the privilege “protects against any disclosures that the witness reasonably believes could be used in a criminal prosecution or could lead to other evidence that might be so used”). 17 See Allen v. Illinois, 478 U.S. 364, 375 (1986); Murray v. Texas Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 294 S.W.3d 360, 366 (Tex. App.—Austin 2009, no pet.); In re Spee 2009See Allen, 478 U.S. 364 at 375 , 106 S.Ct. 2988 ; Browning, 113 S.W.3d at 862 ; In re Speer, 965 S.W.2d 41, 46 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1998, orig. proceeding). | 4 | 4 |
In Re the Commitment of Browninggreen2 sentences2019In re Commitment of Chapman, No. 09-11-00561-CV, 2013 WL 4773231 , at *10 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Sept. 5, 2013, pet. denied) (mem. op.); In re Commitment of Browning, 113 S.W.3d 851 , 862 n.10 (Tex. App.—Austin 2003, pet. denied). 2010See In re Browning, 113 S.W.3d 851 , 862 n.10 (Tex. App.—Austin 2003, pet. denied). 16 J. | 2 | 6 |
Murray v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Servicesgreen1 sentence2016In civil proceedings, unlike criminal ones, there is no right to make a blanket assertion of the privilege against self-incrimination and refuse to answer any questions.17 16 Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 , 444–45 (1972) (noting also that the privilege “protects against any disclosures that the witness reasonably believes could be used in a criminal prosecution or could lead to other evidence that might be so used”). 17 See Allen v. Illinois, 478 U.S. 364, 375 (1986); Murray v. Texas Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 294 S.W.3d 360, 366 (Tex. App.—Austin 2009, no pet.); In re Spee | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kastigar v. United States
green
1 sentence2016In civil proceedings, unlike criminal ones, there is no right to make a blanket assertion of the privilege against self-incrimination and refuse to answer any questions.17 16 Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 , 444–45 (1972) (noting also that the privilege “protects against any disclosures that the witness reasonably believes could be used in a criminal prosecution or could lead to other evidence that might be so used”). 17 See Allen v. Illinois, 478 U.S. 364, 375 (1986); Murray v. Texas Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 294 S.W.3d 360, 366 (Tex. App.—Austin 2009, no pet.); In re Spee | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.