7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wheeler v. Stategreen2 sentences2003Wheeler v. State , 67 S.W.3d 879, 888 (Tex. Crim. 2003Wheeler v. State , 67 S.W.3d 879, 888 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Clay v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Clay v. State, 240 S.W.3d 895, 904 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ozuna
green
2 sentences2011Id. at 311 . 2009Id. at 311 . 2. | 2 | 2009–2011 |
In Re ZLT
green
1 sentence2020Id. at 165–66. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
De La Paz v. State
green
2 sentences2014De La Paz, 279 S.W.3d at 348–49. 2014De La Paz, 279 S.W.3d at 348-49 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.