7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1956–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Anders v. Californiagreen2 sentences2023In the letter, King complains: (1) there were contradictory statements made by witnesses during the consolidated hearing the trial 2See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). 3See id.; High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. 2021See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744 ; Kelly, 436 S.W.3d at 318–19; see also In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 409 n.23. | 2 | 3 |
Bauer v. Jassogreen2 sentences2003Moreover, while substantive defects cannot be waived by failing to object or obtain a written order in the trial court, Bauer v. Jasso , 946 S.W.2d 552, 556-57 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1997, no writ); see Green v. Indus. 2003Moreover, while substantive defects cannot be waived by failing to object or obtain a written order in the trial court, Bauer v. Jasso, 946 S.W.2d 552, 556-57 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1997, no writ); see Green v. Indus. | 2 | 2 |
In Re Schulmangreen1 sentence2021See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744 ; Kelly, 436 S.W.3d at 318–19; see also In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 409 n.23. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
High v. State
green
1 sentence2023In the letter, King complains: (1) there were contradictory statements made by witnesses during the consolidated hearing the trial 2See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). 3See id.; High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Kelly, Sylvester
green
1 sentence2021See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744 ; Kelly, 436 S.W.3d at 318–19; see also In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 409 n.23. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Vrieling v. Oregon State Board of Parole
green
2 sentences1985Vrieling v. Oregon State Board of Parole, 21 Or.App. 245 , 534 P.2d 516 (1975). in Vrieling an Oregon parolee was permitted to go to Washington state. 1985Vrieling v. Oregon State Board of Parole, 21 Or.App. 245 , 534 P.2d 516 (1975). in Vrieling an Oregon parolee was permitted to go to Washington state. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
G. & H. Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Railroad Commission
green
1 sentence1956G & H Motor Freight Lines v. Railroad Commission, Tex.Civ.App., 140 S.W.2d 946 , Er. dism. c.j. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.