7 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Buckholts Independent School District v. Glasergreen2 sentences2015App. 1977); U1 0' 1 see Buckholts, 632 S.W.2d at 148 ) ( [D}isregard of the constitutional disqualification is error that can be raised at any point in the proceeding 11) . 2004Dist. v. Glaser, 632 S.W.2d 146, 148 (Tex.1982) (“[D]isregard of the constitutional disqualification is error that can be raised at any point in the proceeding.”). | 3 | 4 |
Lee v. Stategreen2 sentences2002Ex parte Vivier, 699 S.W.2d at 868 ; Lee v. State, 555 S.W.2d 121, 124 (Tex.Crim.App.1977); see Buckholts, 682 S.W.2d at 148 (“[Disregard of the constitutional disqualification is error that can be raised at any point in the proceeding”). 2002Ex parte Vivier, 699 S.W.2d at 863 ; Lee v. State, 555 S.W.2d 121, 124 (Tex.Crim.App.1977); see Buckholts, 632 S.W.2d at 148 ("[D]isregard of the constitutional disqualification is error that can be raised at any point in the proceeding"). | 2 | 2 |
Tesco American, Inc. v. Strong Industries, Inc.green1 sentence2025On the other hand, there is the jurisdictional effect of constitutional disqualification: “It has always been the rule in Texas that any orders or judgments rendered by a trial judge who is constitutionally disqualified are void and without effect.” Tesco Am., Inc. v. Strong Indus., Inc., 221 S.W.3d 550, 555 (Tex. 2006) (emphasis added). “[T]he disqualification of a judge is a jurisdictional issue that cannot be waived.” Freedom Commc’ns, 372 S.W.3d at 624 (emphasis added). “[D]isregard of the constitutional disqualification is error that can be raised at any point in the proceeding.” Buckholt | 1 | 1 |
Freedom Communications, Inc. v. Coronadogreen1 sentence2025On the other hand, there is the jurisdictional effect of constitutional disqualification: “It has always been the rule in Texas that any orders or judgments rendered by a trial judge who is constitutionally disqualified are void and without effect.” Tesco Am., Inc. v. Strong Indus., Inc., 221 S.W.3d 550, 555 (Tex. 2006) (emphasis added). “[T]he disqualification of a judge is a jurisdictional issue that cannot be waived.” Freedom Commc’ns, 372 S.W.3d at 624 (emphasis added). “[D]isregard of the constitutional disqualification is error that can be raised at any point in the proceeding.” Buckholt | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Vivier
green
2 sentences2002Ex parte Vivier, 699 S.W.2d at 868 ; Lee v. State, 555 S.W.2d 121, 124 (Tex.Crim.App.1977); see Buckholts, 682 S.W.2d at 148 (“[Disregard of the constitutional disqualification is error that can be raised at any point in the proceeding”). 2002Ex parte Vivier, 699 S.W.2d at 863 ; Lee v. State, 555 S.W.2d 121, 124 (Tex.Crim.App.1977); see Buckholts, 632 S.W.2d at 148 ("[D]isregard of the constitutional disqualification is error that can be raised at any point in the proceeding"). | 2 | 2002–2002 |
United States v. Leona M. Helmsley, Joseph v. Licari and Frank J. Turco, Leona M. Helmsley
green
1 sentence2015No judge shall sit in any case wherein the judge may be interested, or where either of the 6 It is obvious to the public-at-large- that Wood and his entire staff take the "Leona Helmsley" approach to the law which is: "'Only the little people are compelled to obey it-not us." See United States v. Helmsley, 941 F.2d 71 (2nd Cir. 1991) (''Only the little people pay taxes ...)" 9 Confidential information may have been redacted from the document in compliance with the Public Information Act. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
City of Austin v. Nalle
green
1 sentence1982Nalle v. City of Austin, 85 Tex. 520 , 22 S.W. 960 (1893); 1 R. | 1 | 1982–1982 |