defendants were entitled claim (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

defendants were entitled claim in Texas

7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1956–2010 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Rexford Kipps, Carol Kipps and Kyle Kipps v. James Caillier, Ray Authement, Nelson J. Schexnayder, Jr., and Nelson Stokleygreen
ca5 · 1999 · cited in 4 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2006–2010
2 sentences

2010See Kipps , 197 F.3d at 768 .

2010See Kipps, 197 F.3d at 768 .

44

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Southwestern Refining Co., Inc. v. Bernal green
tex · 2000
2 sentences

2002Id.

2002Id.

22002–2002
Isom v. White neutral
texapp · 1946
1 sentence

1956Isom v. White, [Tex.] Civ.App., 202 S.W.2d 486 .” Art. 4639, V.A.

11956–1956

Statutes the citing opinions construe

USC § 42u.s.c.1983 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 7 (1956–2010) NY 7 (2024–2025) MI 4 (1998–2017) NH 3 (2005–2015) CT 3 (2007–2016) IL 3 (2003–2007) MS 2 (2002–2004) OR 2 (2005–2005) NJ 2 (2018–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check