7 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1980–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dillard v. Texas Electric Cooperativegreen2 sentences2018See Dillard , 157 S.W.3d at 432 -34 . 2018See Dillard, 157 S.W.3d at 432–34. | 2 | 2 |
Mansfield v. C.F. Bent Tree Apartment Ltd. Partnershipgreen2 sentences2009This is a general law not a Dillard's rule 3 The property included Dillard's bags, but Kyle was not specifically protecting Dillard's property 4 Cf. Mansfield, 37 S.W.3d at 149-50 (when there is no immediate crime and the off-duty officer is protecting a private employer's property or otherwise enforcing a private employer's rules or regulations, the trier of fact determines whether the officer was acting as a public officer). 2009This is a general law not a Dillard’s rule.3 The property included Dillard’s bags, but Kyle was not specifically protecting Dillard’s property.4 Cf. Mansfield, 37 S.W.3d at 149-50 (when there is no immediate crime and the off-duty officer is protecting a private employer’s property or otherwise enforcing a private employer’s rules or regulations, the trier of fact determines whether the officer was acting as a public officer). | 2 | 2 |
Colyer, Wilkie Schell Jr.green1 sentence2023See Colyer, 428 S.W.3d at 122 ; Salazar, 38 S.W.3d at 148 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Salazar v. State
green
1 sentence2023See Colyer, 428 S.W.3d at 122 ; Salazar, 38 S.W.3d at 148 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
in Re: Dillard Department Stores, Inc.
green
1 sentence2006The trial court denied Dillard’s motion to compel, and the court of appeals rejected Dillard’s petition for writ of mandamus. 153 S.W.3d 145 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Ex Parte Matthews
green
2 sentences1980Dillard’s progeny are not relied on by the Court in its opinion in the instant case but none, except Ex parte Matthews, 488 S.W.2d 434 (Tex.Cr.App.1973), as shown on note 7, even advert to § 1 of the amendatory act, and it reaches the same conclusion I do. 1980Dillard's progeny are not relied on by the Court in its opinion in the instant case but none, except Ex parte Matthews, 488 S.W.2d 434 (Tex.Cr.App.1973), as shown on note 7, even advert to § 1 of the amendatory act, and it reaches the same conclusion I do. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.