7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Adams v. First National Bank of Bells/Savoygreen2 sentences2009Dunnagan v. Watson, 204 S.W.3d 30, 41 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied); Adams v. First Nat’l Bank of Bells/Savoy, 154 S.W.3d 859, 876 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2005, no pet.). 2009Dunnagan v. Watson , 204 S.W.3d 30, 41 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied); Adams v. First Nat’l Bank of Bells/ Savoy , 154 S.W.3d 859, 876 (Tex. App. — Dallas 2005, no pet.). “ Equitable relief is not warranted when the plaintiff has engaged in unconscionable, unjust, or inequitable conduct with regard to the issue in dispute.” Dunnagan , 204 S.W.3d at 41 ; see also Flores v. Flores, 116 S.W.3d 870, 876 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.) (“The doctrine applies against a litigant whose own conduct in connection with the same matter or transaction has been unconscientious, unjust, ma | 2 | 2 |
Dunnagan v. Watsongreen2 sentences2009Dunnagan v. Watson, 204 S.W.3d 30, 41 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied); Adams v. First Nat’l Bank of Bells/Savoy, 154 S.W.3d 859, 876 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2005, no pet.). 2009Dunnagan v. Watson , 204 S.W.3d 30, 41 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied); Adams v. First Nat’l Bank of Bells/ Savoy , 154 S.W.3d 859, 876 (Tex. App. — Dallas 2005, no pet.). “ Equitable relief is not warranted when the plaintiff has engaged in unconscionable, unjust, or inequitable conduct with regard to the issue in dispute.” Dunnagan , 204 S.W.3d at 41 ; see also Flores v. Flores, 116 S.W.3d 870, 876 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.) (“The doctrine applies against a litigant whose own conduct in connection with the same matter or transaction has been unconscientious, unjust, ma | 2 | 2 |
Lawrence v. Lawrencegreen2 sentences2005Lawrence v. Lawrence, 911 S.W.2d 443, 449 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1995, writ denied). 2005Lawrence v. Lawrence, 911 S.W.2d 443, 449 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1995, writ denied). | 2 | 2 |
At & T CORP. v. Rylandergreen1 sentence2015AT&T Corp. v. Rylander. 2 S.W.3d 546, 557 (Tex. App.— Austin 1999. pet. denied). | 1 | 1 |
Flores v. Floresgreen1 sentence2009Dunnagan v. Watson , 204 S.W.3d 30, 41 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied); Adams v. First Nat’l Bank of Bells/ Savoy , 154 S.W.3d 859, 876 (Tex. App. — Dallas 2005, no pet.). “ Equitable relief is not warranted when the plaintiff has engaged in unconscionable, unjust, or inequitable conduct with regard to the issue in dispute.” Dunnagan , 204 S.W.3d at 41 ; see also Flores v. Flores, 116 S.W.3d 870, 876 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.) (“The doctrine applies against a litigant whose own conduct in connection with the same matter or transaction has been unconscientious, unjust, ma | 1 | 1 |
City of Fort Worth v. Johnsongreen1 sentence1995City of Fort Worth v. Johnson, 388 S.W.2d 400, 403 (Tex.1964). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Glover v. Union Pacific Railroad
green
1 sentence2024Glover involved neither a tax judgment nor a due process claim, but did, as Map correctly notes, include in its summary of relevant law the statement that “[t]he cause of action for an injury to property belongs to the person owning the property at the time of the injury.” Glover, 187 S.W.3d at 209 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
American Homeowner Preservation Fund, LP v. Pirkle
green
1 sentence2024Additionally, while Pirkle held that the successor party there lacked standing based on an “inquir[y] as to whether there are notions of equity and public policy that would vitiate the assignment of the claim under the circumstances,” 475 S.W.3d at 519 , Pirkle was decided in 2015, before the Supreme Court in Mitchell suggested that related concerns might be considered in a different framework, i.e., in the context of an equitable affirmative defense, as explained in our discussion of laches below. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.