evidence against relevant countervailing factors (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

evidence against relevant countervailing factors in Texas

7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2020–2025 5 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Jbs Carriers, Inc. and James Lundry v. Trinette L. Washington, Sophia Renee Lenzy, Thomas Charles Lenzy, Individually and as Representatives of the Estate of Mary L. Turnergreen
tex · 2018 · cited in 7 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2020–2025
2 sentences

2025“When determining admissibility of evidence under Rule 403, trial judges must balance the probative value of the evidence against relevant countervailing factors.” JBS Carriers, Inc. v. Washington, 564 S.W.3d 830, 836-37 (Tex. 2018).

2024“When determining [the] admissibility of evidence under Rule 403, trial judges must balance the probative value of the evidence against relevant countervailing factors.” JBS Carriers, Inc., 564 S.W.3d at 836 . 24 Because Rule 403 applies in both civil and criminal cases, we may look to decisions in criminal cases for guidance in its interpretation.

57
Kerry Heckman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Williamson Countygreen
tex · 2012 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024Cf. In re D.T., 625 S.W.3d 62 , 72 (Tex. 2021) (looking to criminal law to review similar concepts); Heckman v. Williamson Cnty., 369 S.W.3d 137, 147 (Tex. 2012) (finding guidance in the decisions of the Court of Criminal Appeals). 45 Davis offered the CMS Conditions to support his vicarious-liability theory by showing (1) that Harris had retained a right of control25 over Sundance and Dr. Leitch and (2) that under the applicable standard of care, Harris was ultimately responsible for their actions (or inaction).

11
Mozon v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1999 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
1 sentence

2021We reverse a trial court’s determination under Rule 403 “rarely and only after a clear abuse of discretion.” Mozon v. State, 991 S.W.2d 841, 847 (Tex. Crim.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check