7 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1999–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Luquis v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Luquis v. State, 72 S.W.3d 355, 364 (Tex. Crim. 2005Appellant acknowledges that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has held that this legislatively-mandated instruction was not unconstitutional in Luquis v. State , 72 S.W.3d 355, 365 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 3 |
Druery v. Stategreen1 sentence2022See Druery v. State, 225 S.W.3d 491, 506 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Peter Fazio, Shari Fazio, and Eric Fazio v. Cypress/GR Houston I, L. P. Cypress/GR Houston, Inc. And Cypress Equities, Inc.green1 sentence2015Fazio v. Cypress/GR Houston I, L.P., 403 S.W.3d 390, 421 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2013, pet. denied); CenterPoint Energy Houston Elec., LLC v. Gulf Coast Coal. of Cities, 263 S.W.3d 448, 464 (Tex. App.—Austin 2008), aff’d 324 S.W.3d 95 (Tex. 2010). • A rule is void if it conflicts with a statute’s plain language, and a rule may not change the scope of a legislatively mandated exception. | 1 | 1 |
Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC v. Gulf Coast Coalition of Citiesgreen1 sentence2015Fazio v. Cypress/GR Houston I, L.P., 403 S.W.3d 390, 421 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2013, pet. denied); CenterPoint Energy Houston Elec., LLC v. Gulf Coast Coal. of Cities, 263 S.W.3d 448, 464 (Tex. App.—Austin 2008), aff’d 324 S.W.3d 95 (Tex. 2010). • A rule is void if it conflicts with a statute’s plain language, and a rule may not change the scope of a legislatively mandated exception. | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of Rodriguezgreen1 sentence1999Rather, the court clarified that there must be either direct evidence that placement of the child with the parent would significantly impair the child’s physical health or emotional development or direct evidence from which a factfinder [sic] could reasonably (or perhaps even necessarily) reach that conclusion. *529 In the Interest of Rodriguez, 940 S.W.2d 265, 272 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1997, writ denied). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texas Industrial Energy Consumers v. Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC Public Utility Commission of Texas
green
1 sentence2015Fazio v. Cypress/GR Houston I, L.P., 403 S.W.3d 390, 421 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2013, pet. denied); CenterPoint Energy Houston Elec., LLC v. Gulf Coast Coal. of Cities, 263 S.W.3d 448, 464 (Tex. App.—Austin 2008), aff’d 324 S.W.3d 95 (Tex. 2010). • A rule is void if it conflicts with a statute’s plain language, and a rule may not change the scope of a legislatively mandated exception. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Luquis v. State
green
2 sentences2002Luquis v. State, 997 S.W.2d 442 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1999). 2002Luquis v. State, 997 S.W.2d 442 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1999). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.