lone exception (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

lone exception in Texas

7 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1986–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
in Re the State of Texas Ex Rel. Michael Munkgreen
texapp · 2014 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025Munk, 448 S.W.3d 687, 692 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2014, orig. proceeding) (“We conclude that requiring the State to conduct criminal history searches exceeds the requirements of Brady because the State would be required to independently seek out exculpatory evidence on behalf of the defendant.”). 9 The lone exception is access to “information obtained for the purpose of diagnosis, examination, evaluation, treatment, or referral for treatment of a child by a public or private agency or institution providing supervision of a child by arrangement of the juvenile court or having custody of the child u

11
Ex Parte Thompsongreen
texcrimapp · 2005 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024See Ex parte Thompson, 179 S.W.3d 549, 557 (Tex. Crim.

11
Port Elevator-Brownsville, L.L.C. v. Casadosgreen
tex · 2012 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015See Port Elevator-Brownsville, L.L.C. v. Casados, 358 S.W.3d 238, 241 (Tex. 2012) (concluding that the exclusive-remedy provision barred a worker’s suit against his employer because the provision’s lone exception did not apply); see also Unigard Sec.

11
Ex Parte Thrashgreen
texcrimapp · 1959 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1991–1991
2 sentences

1991We can trace this lone exception back to 1856: “But mere hearsay is not only not the best, nor even secondary evidence; it is no evidence.” Belverman v. State, 16 Tex. 130, 131 (1856); accord Ex parte Thrash, 167 Tex.Crim. 409 , 320 S.W.2d 357, 359 (1959).

1991We can trace this lone exception back to 1856: “But mere hearsay is not only not the best, nor even secondary evidence; it is no evidence.” Belverman v. State, 16 Tex. 130, 131 (1856); accord Ex parte Thrash, 167 Tex.Crim. 409 , 320 S.W.2d 357, 359 (1959).

11
Belverman v. Stategreen
tex · 1856 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1991–1991
2 sentences

1991We can trace this lone exception back to 1856: “But mere hearsay is not only not the best, nor even secondary evidence; it is no evidence.” Belverman v. State, 16 Tex. 130, 131 (1856); accord Ex parte Thrash, 167 Tex.Crim. 409 , 320 S.W.2d 357, 359 (1959).

1991We can trace this lone exception back to 1856: "But mere hearsay is not only not the best, nor even secondary evidence; it is no evidence." Belverman v. State, 16 Tex. 130, 131 (1856); accord Ex parte Thrash, 167 Tex.Crim. 409 , 320 S.W.2d 357, 359 (1959).

11
Gutierrez v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1980 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
2 sentences

1986See, e.g., Gutierrez, supra; Alvarado, supra. This practice stems from the heretofore erroneous premise that inadmissible hearsay completely lacks probative value.

1986See, e.g., Gutierrez, supra; Alvarado, supra. *246 This practice stems from the heretofore erroneous premise that inadmissible hearsay completely lacks probative value.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Brockie v. Webb green
texapp · 2008
1 sentence

2023The lone exception we have recognized to this rule applies when “the plaintiff’s breach of contract claim and the defendant’s counterclaim arise from the same transaction and the same facts required to prosecute the claim are required to defend against the counterclaim,” in which case “attorney’s fees may be appropriate.” Id.

12023–2023
Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. Texas Medical Ass'n green
texapp · 2012
1 sentence

2015Id. at 478 .

12015–2015
Alvarado v. State red
texcrimapp · 1982
2 sentences

1986See, e.g., Gutierrez, supra; Alvarado, supra. This practice stems from the heretofore erroneous premise that inadmissible hearsay completely lacks probative value.

1986See, e.g., Gutierrez, supra; Alvarado, supra. *246 This practice stems from the heretofore erroneous premise that inadmissible hearsay completely lacks probative value.

11986–1986

Where else courts name it

CA 19 (1971–2026) OH 11 (2002–2025) KY 8 (1930–2024) PA 8 (1988–2026) TX 7 (1986–2025) IL 7 (2003–2025) MS 7 (1996–2022) GA 6 (1943–2017) FL 6 (1960–2019) MD 4 (1986–2016) NV 3 (2018–2018) WA 3 (1992–2014) WI 3 (1989–2022) NY 3 (1948–2009) AZ 3 (1984–2025) OK 2 (1948–1972) UT 2 (2023–2024) CO 2 (1987–1987) IN 2 (1995–1999) OR 2 (1966–2020) MO 2 (1999–2006)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check