7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1988–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mendoza v. Stategreen2 sentences2005See 88 S.W.3d at 239 . 2005See 88 S.W.3d at 239 . | 3 | 3 |
Luquis v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Edwards v. State , 10 S.W.3d 699, 703 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); Luquis v. State , 997 S.W.2d 442, 443 (Tex. App.-Beaumont 1999, pet. granted); Jimenez v. State , 992 S.W.2d 633, 637-38 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); see also Hyde v. State , 970 S.W.2d 81, 88-89 (Tex. App.-Austin 1998, pet. ref'd). 2000Edwards v. State, 10 S.W.3d 699, 703 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); Luquis v. State, 997 S.W.2d 442, 443 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1999, pet. granted); Jimenez v. State, 992 S.W.2d 633, 636-38 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); see also Cagle v. State, 23 S.W.3d 590 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth July 6, 2000, no pet. h.); Ballard v. State, No. 05-97-01452-CR, 2000 WL 99871 , 2000 Tex.App. | 2 | 2 |
Jimenez v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Edwards v. State , 10 S.W.3d 699, 703 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); Luquis v. State , 997 S.W.2d 442, 443 (Tex. App.-Beaumont 1999, pet. granted); Jimenez v. State , 992 S.W.2d 633, 637-38 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); see also Hyde v. State , 970 S.W.2d 81, 88-89 (Tex. App.-Austin 1998, pet. ref'd). 2000Edwards v. State, 10 S.W.3d 699, 703 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); Luquis v. State, 997 S.W.2d 442, 443 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1999, pet. granted); Jimenez v. State, 992 S.W.2d 633, 636-38 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); see also Cagle v. State, 23 S.W.3d 590 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth July 6, 2000, no pet. h.); Ballard v. State, No. 05-97-01452-CR, 2000 WL 99871 , 2000 Tex.App. | 2 | 2 |
Edwards v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Edwards v. State , 10 S.W.3d 699, 703 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); Luquis v. State , 997 S.W.2d 442, 443 (Tex. App.-Beaumont 1999, pet. granted); Jimenez v. State , 992 S.W.2d 633, 637-38 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); see also Hyde v. State , 970 S.W.2d 81, 88-89 (Tex. App.-Austin 1998, pet. ref'd). 2000Edwards v. State, 10 S.W.3d 699, 703 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); Luquis v. State, 997 S.W.2d 442, 443 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1999, pet. granted); Jimenez v. State, 992 S.W.2d 633, 636-38 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); see also Cagle v. State, 23 S.W.3d 590 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth July 6, 2000, no pet. h.); Ballard v. State, No. 05-97-01452-CR, 2000 WL 99871 , 2000 Tex.App. | 2 | 2 |
Hyde v. Stategreen1 sentence2001Edwards v. State , 10 S.W.3d 699, 703 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); Luquis v. State , 997 S.W.2d 442, 443 (Tex. App.-Beaumont 1999, pet. granted); Jimenez v. State , 992 S.W.2d 633, 637-38 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); see also Hyde v. State , 970 S.W.2d 81, 88-89 (Tex. App.-Austin 1998, pet. ref'd). | 1 | 1 |
Cagle v. Stategreen2 sentences2000Edwards v. State, 10 S.W.3d 699, 703 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); Luquis v. State, 997 S.W.2d 442, 443 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1999, pet. granted); Jimenez v. State, 992 S.W.2d 633, 636-38 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); see also Cagle v. State, 23 S.W.3d 590 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth July 6, 2000, no pet. h.); Ballard v. State, No. 05-97-01452-CR, 2000 WL 99871 , 2000 Tex.App. 2000Edwards v. State, 10 S.W.3d 699, 703 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); Luquis v. State, 997 S.W.2d 442, 443 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1999, pet. granted); Jimenez v. State, 992 S.W.2d 633, 636-38 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. granted); see also Cagle v. State, 23 S.W.3d 590 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth July 6, 2000, no pet. h.); Ballard v. State, No. 05-97-01452-CR, 2000 WL 99871 , 2000 Tex.App. | 1 | 1 |
Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Pattongreen1 sentence1988See Patton, 295 S.W. at 915 (article 1856 “is in its terms mandatory”); Calvert, Appellate Court Judgments, 6 TEX.TECH L.REV. 915, 919 (1975) (rule 434 of the rules of civil procedure imposes a “mandatory duty” upon the court). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gonzalez v. Villarreal
green
2 sentences2015Gonzalez v. Villareal, 251 S.W.3d at 778 65. 2015Gonzalez v. Villareal, 251 S.W.3d at 778 65. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.