7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers, Inc. v. Attorney General of Texasgreen2 sentences2011See Charleston, 244 S.W.3d at 564 (dismissing appellant’s remaining claims for lack of jurisdiction because appellant failed to post required bond); Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers, 670 S.W.2d at 402 (same). 2011See Charleston , 244 S.W.3d at 564 (dismissing appellant's remaining claims for lack of jurisdiction because appellant failed to post required bond); Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers , 670 S.W.2d at 402 (same). | 3 | 3 |
Charleston v. Waller Independent School Districtgreen2 sentences2011See Charleston, 244 S.W.3d at 564 (dismissing appellant’s remaining claims for lack of jurisdiction because appellant failed to post required bond); Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers, 670 S.W.2d at 402 (same). 2011See Charleston , 244 S.W.3d at 564 (dismissing appellant's remaining claims for lack of jurisdiction because appellant failed to post required bond); Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers , 670 S.W.2d at 402 (same). | 3 | 3 |
Hotze v. City of Houstongreen2 sentences2018Id. at 815-20 . 2011See Hotze v. City of Houston , Nos. 03-10-00423-CV, 03-10-00433-CV, 03-10-00497-CV, 2011 WL 1562910, at *8 (Tex. App.--Austin Apr. 22, 2011, no pet.). | 2 | 3 |
Leonard v. Abbottgreen1 sentence2013See Retzlaff v. GoAmerica Comm. Corp., 356 S.W.3d 689, 703-04 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2011, no pet.) (rejecting challenge to $12,500 bond requirement by a party who filed an uncontested affidavit of indigence at trial); Leonard v. Abbott, 171 S.W.3d 451, 457-58 (Tex. App.— Austin 2005, pet. denied) (finding requirement to furnish security in the amount of $80,000 was not unreasonable when balanced with the costs of defending suit). | 1 | 1 |
Tom Retzlaff v. Go America Communications Corporation, Aaron David Dubrinski, and John and/or Jane Doegreen1 sentence2013See Retzlaff v. GoAmerica Comm. Corp., 356 S.W.3d 689, 703-04 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2011, no pet.) (rejecting challenge to $12,500 bond requirement by a party who filed an uncontested affidavit of indigence at trial); Leonard v. Abbott, 171 S.W.3d 451, 457-58 (Tex. App.— Austin 2005, pet. denied) (finding requirement to furnish security in the amount of $80,000 was not unreasonable when balanced with the costs of defending suit). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Buckholts Independent School District v. Glaser
green
1 sentence2018Id. ; see also Tex. Gov't Code § 1205.102 (requiring trial court, upon motion, to impose bond "unless, at the hearing on the motion, the opposing party or intervenor establishes that the person is entitled to a temporary injunction against the issuance of the public securities"). | 1 | 2018–2018 |