7 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1964–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Arlington v. City of Fort Worthgreen2 sentences2016Specifically, the parents ask the trial court to “enjoin [the district] from failing and refusing to provide Plaintiffs’ children and those similarly situated with equal education funding for all students at comparable ’grade levels, appropriately weighted according to the state funding formula.” The parents allege that the district has been distributing funds in an inappropriate manner for years, but contend that the existing distribution scheme cannot be the “status quo” because it is “illegal.” While it is true that “the status quo cannot be a violation of the law,” when the determination o 2011In re Newton, 146 S.W.3d at 652 ; City of Arlington, 873 S.W.2d at 769 . | 1 | 4 |
Pharaoh Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Ranchero Esperanza, Ltd.green1 sentence2021In re Newton, 146 S.W.3d at 652 ; Pharaoh Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Ranchero Esperanza, Ltd., 343 S.W.3d 875, 882 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2011, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Ennis Bush v. Oceans International, Sumitomo Trust Bank Co., Ltd.green2 sentences1982Bush v. Oceans International, 621 F.2d 207, 211, n. 5 (CA 5 1980). 1982Bush v. Oceans International, 621 F.2d 207, 211, n. 5 (CA 5 1980). | 1 | 1 |
Famous Department Store v. Stategreen1 sentence1964See also, Famous Department Store v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 371 S.W.2d 76 ; City of Corpus Christi v. Lone Star Fish and Oyster Co., Tex.Civ.App., 335 S.W.2d 621 ; Gifford v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 229 S.W.2d 949 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Newton
green
2 sentences2021In re Newton, 146 S.W.3d at 652 ; Pharaoh Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Ranchero Esperanza, Ltd., 343 S.W.3d 875, 882 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2011, no pet.). 2016Specifically, the parents ask the trial court to “enjoin [the district] from failing and refusing to provide Plaintiffs’ children and those similarly situated with equal education funding for all students at comparable ’grade levels, appropriately weighted according to the state funding formula.” The parents allege that the district has been distributing funds in an inappropriate manner for years, but contend that the existing distribution scheme cannot be the “status quo” because it is “illegal.” While it is true that “the status quo cannot be a violation of the law,” when the determination o | 5 | 2011–2021 |
City of Corpus Christi v. Lone Star Fish & Oyster Co.
green
1 sentence1964See also, Famous Department Store v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 371 S.W.2d 76 ; City of Corpus Christi v. Lone Star Fish and Oyster Co., Tex.Civ.App., 335 S.W.2d 621 ; Gifford v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 229 S.W.2d 949 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Gifford v. State
green
1 sentence1964See also, Famous Department Store v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 371 S.W.2d 76 ; City of Corpus Christi v. Lone Star Fish and Oyster Co., Tex.Civ.App., 335 S.W.2d 621 ; Gifford v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 229 S.W.2d 949 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Rattikin Title Co. v. Grievance Committee of State Bar of Texas
green
1 sentence1964In Rattikin Title Company v. Grievance Committee of State Bar of Texas, Tex.Civ.App., 272 S.W.2d 948 , the Court recognized the status quo rule and said: “But in an injunction case wherein the very acts sought to be enjoined are acts which prima facie constitute the violation of expressed law, the status quo could never be a condition of affairs where the respondent would be permitted to continue the acts constituting that violation.” The Court held that when it is determined that the law is being violated, it is the province and the duty of the court to restrain it. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.