7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2009–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Compania De Vapores Insco, S.A. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Companygreen1 sentence2015The court 40 Compania, 232 F.2d at 660. -13- NO. 73639-6-1 /14 essentially instructed the jury that the wave was an act of God and an act of God is one that "cannot be reasonably anticipated or guarded against by the exercise of ordinary care." Thus, after telling the jury that the wave was an act of God, the court compounded this error by instructing the jury that Paradise's failure to anticipate or guard against an act of God was not negligence. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Stanley
green
2 sentences2011Stanley, 120 Wn. 2011Stanley, 120 Wash.App. at 318 , 85 P.3d 395 . ¶ 11 Because, therein, the defendant's conviction was reversed based upon the trial court's failure to instruct the reconstituted jury to begin its deliberations anewa requirement *813 clearly mandated by CrR 6.5 that part of the Stanley decision expounding upon additional error is dictum. | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Havens v. C & D PLASTICS, INC.
green
2 sentences2009Havens, 124 Wash.2d at 165 , 876 P.2d 435 . ¶ 59 Boeing also contends that the trial court compounded its error by rejecting a proposed curative instruction on the apportionment of damages. 2009Havens, 124 Wn.2d at 165 . ¶59 Boeing also contends that the trial court compounded its error by rejecting a proposed curative instruction on the apportionment of damages. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Ward v. Race Horse
green
2 sentences2024State v. Towessnute, 89 Wash. 478 , 154 P. 805 (1916), judgment vacated and opinion repudiated by 197 Wn.2d 574 , 486 P.3d 111 (2020); Ward v. 5 State v. Wallahee, No. 20439-0 Race Horse, 163 U.S. 504 , 16 S. Ct. 1076 , 41 L. 2024State v. Towessnute, 89 Wash. 478 , 154 P. 805 (1916), judgment vacated and opinion repudiated by 197 Wn.2d 574 , 486 P.3d 111 (2020); Ward v. 5 State v. Wallahee, No. 20439-0 Race Horse, 163 U.S. 504 , 16 S. Ct. 1076 , 41 L. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
In Re Marriage of Shui and Rose
green
1 sentence2024App. 568, 574, 587, 591 , 125 P.3d 180 (2005) (remanding to the trial court for reconsideration of the distribution of the parties’ assets where the trial court’s methodology classifying stock options, the main asset to distribute, was erroneous and the trial court compounded this error by failing to recognize that the proceeds derived from the stock options were commingled and entirely community property). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Towessnute
green
2 sentences2024State v. Towessnute, 89 Wash. 478 , 154 P. 805 (1916), judgment vacated and opinion repudiated by 197 Wn.2d 574 , 486 P.3d 111 (2020); Ward v. 5 State v. Wallahee, No. 20439-0 Race Horse, 163 U.S. 504 , 16 S. Ct. 1076 , 41 L. 2024State v. Towessnute, 89 Wash. 478 , 154 P. 805 (1916), judgment vacated and opinion repudiated by 197 Wn.2d 574 , 486 P.3d 111 (2020); Ward v. 5 State v. Wallahee, No. 20439-0 Race Horse, 163 U.S. 504 , 16 S. Ct. 1076 , 41 L. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Stanley
green
1 sentence2011Stanley, 120 Wash.App. at 318 , 85 P.3d 395 . ¶ 11 Because, therein, the defendant's conviction was reversed based upon the trial court's failure to instruct the reconstituted jury to begin its deliberations anewa requirement *813 clearly mandated by CrR 6.5 that part of the Stanley decision expounding upon additional error is dictum. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.