7 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1981–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Marriage of Dalthorpgreen2 sentences2016App. 187, 189 , 622 P.2d 1288 (1981); see In re Marriage of Dalthorp, 23 Wn. 2016App. 187, 189 , 622 P.2d 1288 (1981); see In re Marriage of Dalthorp, 23 Wn. | 3 | 3 |
In Re the Marriage of Murraygreen2 sentences2025And when a trial court’s “written findings of fact do not clearly reflect a consideration of the statutory factors, resort can be made to the court’s oral ruling.” In re Marriage of Murray, 28 Wn. 2024App. 187, 189 , 622 P.2d 1288 (1981) (“When written findings of fact do not clearly reflect a consideration of the statutory factors, resort can be made to the court’s oral opinion.”). | 1 | 6 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.